diff for duplicates of <1509722197.15520.17.camel@perches.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index eda27ee..560df5d 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,20 +1,18 @@ -On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 13:55 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: -> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:02:50AM +0100, Javier Gonz=E1lez wrote: -> > Signed-off-by: Javier Gonz=E1lez <javier@cnexlabs.com> +On Fri, 2017-11-03@13:55 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: +> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017@11:02:50AM +0100, Javier Gonz?lez wrote: +> > Signed-off-by: Javier Gonz?lez <javier at cnexlabs.com> [] > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c [] -> > @@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ static ssize_t eui_show(struct device *dev, struc= -t device_attribute *attr, +> > @@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ static ssize_t eui_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, > > char *buf) > > { -> > struct nvme_ns *ns =3D nvme_get_ns_from_dev(dev); +> > struct nvme_ns *ns = nvme_get_ns_from_dev(dev); > > - return sprintf(buf, "%8phd\n", ns->eui); > > + return sprintf(buf, "%8phD\n", ns->eui); > > } > > static DEVICE_ATTR(eui, S_IRUGO, eui_show, NULL); -> = - +> > This looks correct. I wonder what the old code printed - does someone > have a device with an EUI-64 at hand to quickly cross check what we > did before? @@ -32,10 +30,3 @@ Perhaps this should just become %8ph without D - - - -_______________________________________________ -Linux-nvme mailing list -Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org -http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 2b849d0..2753d26 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,36 +1,26 @@ "ref\01509703370-20379-1-git-send-email-javier@cnexlabs.com\0" "ref\01509703370-20379-4-git-send-email-javier@cnexlabs.com\0" "ref\020171103125516.GC25186@lst.de\0" - "From\0Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 3/3] nvme: fix eui_show() print format\0" + "From\0joe@perches.com (Joe Perches)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH 3/3] nvme: fix eui_show() print format\0" "Date\0Fri, 03 Nov 2017 08:16:37 -0700\0" - "To\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>" - " Javier Gonz\303\241lez <jg@lightnvm.io>\0" - "Cc\0linux-block@vger.kernel.org" - sagi@grimberg.me - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org - keith.busch@intel.com - " Javier Gonz\303\241lez <javier@cnexlabs.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 13:55 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:\n" - "> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:02:50AM +0100, Javier Gonz=E1lez wrote:\n" - "> > Signed-off-by: Javier Gonz=E1lez <javier@cnexlabs.com>\n" + "On Fri, 2017-11-03@13:55 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:\n" + "> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017@11:02:50AM +0100, Javier Gonz?lez wrote:\n" + "> > Signed-off-by: Javier Gonz?lez <javier at cnexlabs.com>\n" "[]\n" "> > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c\n" "[]\n" - "> > @@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ static ssize_t eui_show(struct device *dev, struc=\n" - "t device_attribute *attr,\n" + "> > @@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ static ssize_t eui_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,\n" "> > \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tchar *buf)\n" "> > {\n" - "> > \tstruct nvme_ns *ns =3D nvme_get_ns_from_dev(dev);\n" + "> > \tstruct nvme_ns *ns = nvme_get_ns_from_dev(dev);\n" "> > -\treturn sprintf(buf, \"%8phd\\n\", ns->eui);\n" "> > +\treturn sprintf(buf, \"%8phD\\n\", ns->eui);\n" "> > }\n" "> > static DEVICE_ATTR(eui, S_IRUGO, eui_show, NULL);\n" - "> =\n" - "\n" + "> \n" "> This looks correct. I wonder what the old code printed - does someone\n" "> have a device with an EUI-64 at hand to quickly cross check what we\n" "> did before?\n" @@ -47,13 +37,6 @@ "\n" "\t%8ph\n" "\n" - "without D\n" - "\n" - "\n" - "\n" - "_______________________________________________\n" - "Linux-nvme mailing list\n" - "Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org\n" - http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme + without D -ec8d8f00afd1c18ee73a654c738f493717026a20ac2a58c0019053777f62de73 +94a89ae3666d0a8c67b81261b9b4e886a71fc882bfbc2875eabb5cbf4a0d90bc
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index eda27ee..7f7d067 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -1,20 +1,18 @@ On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 13:55 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: -> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:02:50AM +0100, Javier Gonz=E1lez wrote: -> > Signed-off-by: Javier Gonz=E1lez <javier@cnexlabs.com> +> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:02:50AM +0100, Javier González wrote: +> > Signed-off-by: Javier González <javier@cnexlabs.com> [] > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c [] -> > @@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ static ssize_t eui_show(struct device *dev, struc= -t device_attribute *attr, +> > @@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ static ssize_t eui_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, > > char *buf) > > { -> > struct nvme_ns *ns =3D nvme_get_ns_from_dev(dev); +> > struct nvme_ns *ns = nvme_get_ns_from_dev(dev); > > - return sprintf(buf, "%8phd\n", ns->eui); > > + return sprintf(buf, "%8phD\n", ns->eui); > > } > > static DEVICE_ATTR(eui, S_IRUGO, eui_show, NULL); -> = - +> > This looks correct. I wonder what the old code printed - does someone > have a device with an EUI-64 at hand to quickly cross check what we > did before? @@ -32,10 +30,3 @@ Perhaps this should just become %8ph without D - - - -_______________________________________________ -Linux-nvme mailing list -Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org -http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 2b849d0..5ebd791 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -6,31 +6,29 @@ "Date\0Fri, 03 Nov 2017 08:16:37 -0700\0" "To\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>" " Javier Gonz\303\241lez <jg@lightnvm.io>\0" - "Cc\0linux-block@vger.kernel.org" - sagi@grimberg.me - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org + "Cc\0sagi@grimberg.me" keith.busch@intel.com + linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org + linux-block@vger.kernel.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org " Javier Gonz\303\241lez <javier@cnexlabs.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 13:55 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:\n" - "> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:02:50AM +0100, Javier Gonz=E1lez wrote:\n" - "> > Signed-off-by: Javier Gonz=E1lez <javier@cnexlabs.com>\n" + "> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:02:50AM +0100, Javier Gonz\303\241lez wrote:\n" + "> > Signed-off-by: Javier Gonz\303\241lez <javier@cnexlabs.com>\n" "[]\n" "> > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c\n" "[]\n" - "> > @@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ static ssize_t eui_show(struct device *dev, struc=\n" - "t device_attribute *attr,\n" + "> > @@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ static ssize_t eui_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,\n" "> > \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tchar *buf)\n" "> > {\n" - "> > \tstruct nvme_ns *ns =3D nvme_get_ns_from_dev(dev);\n" + "> > \tstruct nvme_ns *ns = nvme_get_ns_from_dev(dev);\n" "> > -\treturn sprintf(buf, \"%8phd\\n\", ns->eui);\n" "> > +\treturn sprintf(buf, \"%8phD\\n\", ns->eui);\n" "> > }\n" "> > static DEVICE_ATTR(eui, S_IRUGO, eui_show, NULL);\n" - "> =\n" - "\n" + "> \n" "> This looks correct. I wonder what the old code printed - does someone\n" "> have a device with an EUI-64 at hand to quickly cross check what we\n" "> did before?\n" @@ -47,13 +45,6 @@ "\n" "\t%8ph\n" "\n" - "without D\n" - "\n" - "\n" - "\n" - "_______________________________________________\n" - "Linux-nvme mailing list\n" - "Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org\n" - http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme + without D -ec8d8f00afd1c18ee73a654c738f493717026a20ac2a58c0019053777f62de73 +137bc2885cdd1723980eb7ab8816b4e122469ac50c63c7ec7f3491b63bd9ca62
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.