Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] ASoC: Intel: boards: align/fix SKL/BXT/KBL Kconfigs

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 18:02 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> No reason why SND_SOC_INTEL_SST should be set here.
> Also make sure same dependencies are used everywhere (only last one
> has SPI
> in addition)

Regarding to my comment against previous patch...

>  config SND_SOC_INTEL_SKL_RT286_MACH
>  	tristate "ASoC Audio driver for SKL with RT286 I2S mode"
> -	depends on X86 && ACPI && I2C
> +	depends on X86_INTEL_LPSS && I2C && ACPI

Skylake -> No.

>  config SND_SOC_INTEL_SKL_NAU88L25_SSM4567_MACH
>  	tristate "ASoC Audio driver for SKL with NAU88L25 and SSM4567
> in I2S Mode"
> -	depends on X86_INTEL_LPSS && I2C
> +	depends on X86_INTEL_LPSS && I2C && ACPI

Skylake -> No.

>  config SND_SOC_INTEL_SKL_NAU88L25_MAX98357A_MACH
>  	tristate "ASoC Audio driver for SKL with NAU88L25 and
> MAX98357A in I2S Mode"
> -	depends on X86_INTEL_LPSS && I2C
> +	depends on X86_INTEL_LPSS && I2C && ACPI

Skylake -> No.
 
>  config SND_SOC_INTEL_BXT_DA7219_MAX98357A_MACH
>  	tristate "ASoC Audio driver for Broxton with DA7219 and
> MAX98357A in I2S Mode"
> -	depends on X86 && ACPI && I2C
> +	depends on X86_INTEL_LPSS && I2C && ACPI

Broxton -> No.

>  config SND_SOC_INTEL_BXT_RT298_MACH
>  	tristate "ASoC Audio driver for Broxton with RT298 I2S mode"
> -	depends on X86 && ACPI && I2C
> +	depends on X86_INTEL_LPSS && I2C && ACPI

Broxton -> No.

>  config SND_SOC_INTEL_KBL_RT5663_MAX98927_MACH
>  	tristate "ASoC Audio driver for KBL with RT5663 and MAX98927
> in I2S Mode"
> -	depends on X86_INTEL_LPSS && I2C
> -	select SND_SOC_INTEL_SST
> +	depends on X86_INTEL_LPSS && I2C && ACPI

Kabylake -> No.
 
>  config SND_SOC_INTEL_KBL_RT5663_RT5514_MAX98927_MACH
>          tristate "ASoC Audio driver for KBL with RT5663, RT5514 and
> MAX98927 in I2S Mode"
> -        depends on X86_INTEL_LPSS && I2C && SPI
> -        select SND_SOC_INTEL_SST
> +        depends on X86_INTEL_LPSS && I2C && SPI && ACPI

Kabylake -> No.

This patch WRT X86_INTEL_LPSS for selected SoCs does not make any sense.


Perhaps you need to depend on

MFD_INTEL_LPSS (Skylake and newer)

instead.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy