* [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl
@ 2017-12-04 23:22 Lucas De Marchi
2017-12-04 23:42 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lucas De Marchi @ 2017-12-04 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Cc: Arthur J Runyan, Ville Syrjälä, Rodrigo Vivi, stable,
Lucas De Marchi
Display WA #1183 was recently added to workaround
"Failures when enabling DPLL0 with eDP link rate 2.16
or 4.32 GHz and CD clock frequency 308.57 or 617.14 MHz
(CDCLK_CTL CD Frequency Select 10b or 11b) used in this
enabling or in previous enabling."
This workaround was designed to minimize the impact only
to save the bad case with that link rates. But HW engineers
indicated that it should be safe to apply broadly, although
they were expecting the DPLL0 link rate to be unchanged on
runtime.
We need to cover 2 cases: when we are in fact enabling DPLL0
and when we are just changing the frequency with small
differences.
This is based on previous patch by Rodrigo Vivi with suggestions
from Ville Syrjälä.
Cc: Arthur J Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 10 ++++++++++
3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 09bf043c1c2e..73335e709ed6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -7021,6 +7021,7 @@ enum {
#define RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE (1<<4)
#define GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1 _MMIO(0x46430)
+#define SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT (1<<30)
#define MASK_WAKEMEM (1<<13)
#define SKL_DFSM _MMIO(0x51000)
@@ -8575,6 +8576,7 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
#define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_2 (2<<22)
#define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_4 (3<<22)
#define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe) ((pipe)<<20)
+#define CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE (1<<19)
#define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(3)
#define BXT_CDCLK_SSA_PRECHARGE_ENABLE (1<<16)
#define CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK (0x7ff)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
index 9c5ceb98d48f..d77e2bec1e29 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -931,16 +931,10 @@ static void skl_set_preferred_cdclk_vco(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
static void skl_dpll0_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int vco)
{
- int min_cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, vco);
u32 val;
WARN_ON(vco != 8100000 && vco != 8640000);
- /* select the minimum CDCLK before enabling DPLL 0 */
- val = CDCLK_FREQ_337_308 | skl_cdclk_decimal(min_cdclk);
- I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val);
- POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
-
/*
* We always enable DPLL0 with the lowest link rate possible, but still
* taking into account the VCO required to operate the eDP panel at the
@@ -994,7 +988,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
{
int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
int vco = cdclk_state->vco;
- u32 freq_select;
+ u32 freq_select, cdclk_ctl;
int ret;
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
@@ -1009,7 +1003,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
return;
}
- /* set CDCLK_CTL */
+ /* Choose frequency for this cdclk */
switch (cdclk) {
default:
WARN_ON(cdclk != dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref);
@@ -1036,10 +1030,33 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
skl_dpll0_disable(dev_priv);
+ cdclk_ctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
+
+ if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) {
+ /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */
+ cdclk_ctl &= ~(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK | CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK);
+ cdclk_ctl |= freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk);
+ I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl);
+ }
+
+ /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */
+ cdclk_ctl |= CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE;
+ I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl);
+ POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
+
if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
skl_dpll0_enable(dev_priv, vco);
- I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk));
+ /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */
+ cdclk_ctl &= ~(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK | CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK);
+ I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl);
+
+ cdclk_ctl |= freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk);
+ I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl);
+
+ /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */
+ cdclk_ctl &= ~CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE;
+ I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl);
POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
/* inform PCU of the change */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
index 8315499452dc..35796fa8e6b4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
@@ -598,6 +598,11 @@ void gen9_enable_dc5(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling DC5\n");
+ /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */
+ if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
+ I915_WRITE(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, I915_READ(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) |
+ SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT);
+
gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5);
}
@@ -625,6 +630,11 @@ void skl_disable_dc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling DC6\n");
+ /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */
+ if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
+ I915_WRITE(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, I915_READ(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) |
+ SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT);
+
gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
}
--
2.14.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl 2017-12-04 23:22 [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl Lucas De Marchi @ 2017-12-04 23:42 ` Patchwork 2017-12-05 0:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork 2017-12-22 19:58 ` Ville Syrjälä 2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2017-12-04 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas De Marchi; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34873/ State : success == Summary == Series 34873v1 drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/34873/revisions/1/mbox/ Test kms_pipe_crc_basic: Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c: pass -> FAIL (fi-skl-6700k) fdo#103191 fdo#103191 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191 fi-bdw-5557u total:288 pass:267 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:443s fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:288 pass:264 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:445s fi-blb-e6850 total:288 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:387s fi-bsw-n3050 total:288 pass:242 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:516s fi-bwr-2160 total:288 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 time:281s fi-bxt-dsi total:288 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:500s fi-bxt-j4205 total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:505s fi-byt-j1900 total:288 pass:253 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:491s fi-byt-n2820 total:288 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:477s fi-elk-e7500 total:224 pass:163 dwarn:14 dfail:1 fail:0 skip:45 fi-gdg-551 total:288 pass:178 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:108 time:270s fi-glk-1 total:288 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:537s fi-hsw-4770 total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:372s fi-hsw-4770r total:288 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:259s fi-ilk-650 total:288 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:395s fi-ivb-3520m total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:480s fi-ivb-3770 total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:450s fi-kbl-7500u total:288 pass:263 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:484s fi-kbl-7560u total:288 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:532s fi-kbl-7567u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:474s fi-kbl-r total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:531s fi-skl-6260u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:453s fi-skl-6600u total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:538s fi-skl-6700hq total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:565s fi-skl-6700k total:288 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:24 time:517s fi-skl-6770hq total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:497s fi-skl-gvtdvm total:288 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:447s fi-snb-2520m total:288 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:549s fi-snb-2600 total:288 pass:248 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:415s Blacklisted hosts: fi-cfl-s2 total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:606s fi-cnl-y total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:641s fi-glk-dsi total:288 pass:245 dwarn:1 dfail:4 fail:0 skip:38 time:535s cee3f135bf4e95188222d7a5ffaeb1e4f0185fc9 drm-tip: 2017y-12m-04d-21h-06m-29s UTC integration manifest 06bdc16eade0 drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7402/ _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl 2017-12-04 23:22 [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl Lucas De Marchi 2017-12-04 23:42 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork @ 2017-12-05 0:27 ` Patchwork 2017-12-22 19:58 ` Ville Syrjälä 2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2017-12-05 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas De Marchi; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34873/ State : success == Summary == Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Subgroup fbc-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-render: pass -> FAIL (shard-snb) fdo#101623 +1 Test gem_tiled_swapping: Subgroup non-threaded: pass -> INCOMPLETE (shard-snb) fdo#104009 Test kms_setmode: Subgroup basic: pass -> FAIL (shard-hsw) fdo#99912 fdo#101623 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101623 fdo#104009 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104009 fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912 shard-hsw total:2679 pass:1536 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:10 skip:1132 time:9464s shard-snb total:2663 pass:1297 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:12 skip:1352 time:7915s Blacklisted hosts: shard-apl total:2679 pass:1676 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:23 skip:978 time:13623s shard-kbl total:2679 pass:1795 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:23 skip:860 time:10813s == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7402/shards.html _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl 2017-12-04 23:22 [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl Lucas De Marchi @ 2017-12-22 19:58 ` Ville Syrjälä 2017-12-05 0:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork 2017-12-22 19:58 ` Ville Syrjälä 2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-12-22 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas De Marchi; +Cc: intel-gfx, Arthur J Runyan, Rodrigo Vivi, stable On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:22:10PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Display WA #1183 was recently added to workaround > "Failures when enabling DPLL0 with eDP link rate 2.16 > or 4.32 GHz and CD clock frequency 308.57 or 617.14 MHz > (CDCLK_CTL CD Frequency Select 10b or 11b) used in this > enabling or in previous enabling." > > This workaround was designed to minimize the impact only > to save the bad case with that link rates. But HW engineers > indicated that it should be safe to apply broadly, although > they were expecting the DPLL0 link rate to be unchanged on > runtime. > > We need to cover 2 cases: when we are in fact enabling DPLL0 > and when we are just changing the frequency with small > differences. > > This is based on previous patch by Rodrigo Vivi with suggestions > from Ville Syrjälä. > > Cc: Arthur J Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Hmm. This is v4, but it was posted after v5? You didn't include a changelog in the commit message so I have no idea what is the difference between these versions. They appear similar on a first glance. The changes here *look* correct to me, so Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> But I'm not going to push this right now because I'm too confused about the version of the patch. I'll be out for a few weeks so if the confusion is lifted during that time and you want this in please poke at someone else to push it. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > index 09bf043c1c2e..73335e709ed6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > @@ -7021,6 +7021,7 @@ enum { > #define RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE (1<<4) > > #define GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1 _MMIO(0x46430) > +#define SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT (1<<30) > #define MASK_WAKEMEM (1<<13) > > #define SKL_DFSM _MMIO(0x51000) > @@ -8575,6 +8576,7 @@ enum skl_power_gate { > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_2 (2<<22) > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_4 (3<<22) > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe) ((pipe)<<20) > +#define CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE (1<<19) > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(3) > #define BXT_CDCLK_SSA_PRECHARGE_ENABLE (1<<16) > #define CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK (0x7ff) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > index 9c5ceb98d48f..d77e2bec1e29 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > @@ -931,16 +931,10 @@ static void skl_set_preferred_cdclk_vco(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > static void skl_dpll0_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int vco) > { > - int min_cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, vco); > u32 val; > > WARN_ON(vco != 8100000 && vco != 8640000); > > - /* select the minimum CDCLK before enabling DPLL 0 */ > - val = CDCLK_FREQ_337_308 | skl_cdclk_decimal(min_cdclk); > - I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val); > - POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > - > /* > * We always enable DPLL0 with the lowest link rate possible, but still > * taking into account the VCO required to operate the eDP panel at the > @@ -994,7 +988,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > { > int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk; > int vco = cdclk_state->vco; > - u32 freq_select; > + u32 freq_select, cdclk_ctl; > int ret; > > mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock); > @@ -1009,7 +1003,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > return; > } > > - /* set CDCLK_CTL */ > + /* Choose frequency for this cdclk */ > switch (cdclk) { > default: > WARN_ON(cdclk != dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref); > @@ -1036,10 +1030,33 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) > skl_dpll0_disable(dev_priv); > > + cdclk_ctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > + > + if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) { > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > + cdclk_ctl &= ~(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK | CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK); > + cdclk_ctl |= freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk); > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > + } > + > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > + cdclk_ctl |= CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE; > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > + POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > + > if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) > skl_dpll0_enable(dev_priv, vco); > > - I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk)); > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > + cdclk_ctl &= ~(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK | CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK); > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > + > + cdclk_ctl |= freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk); > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > + > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > + cdclk_ctl &= ~CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE; > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > > /* inform PCU of the change */ > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > index 8315499452dc..35796fa8e6b4 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > @@ -598,6 +598,11 @@ void gen9_enable_dc5(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling DC5\n"); > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > + if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) > + I915_WRITE(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, I915_READ(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) | > + SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT); > + > gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5); > } > > @@ -625,6 +630,11 @@ void skl_disable_dc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > { > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling DC6\n"); > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > + if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) > + I915_WRITE(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, I915_READ(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) | > + SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT); > + > gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE); > } > > -- > 2.14.3 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl @ 2017-12-22 19:58 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-12-22 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas De Marchi; +Cc: intel-gfx, Arthur J Runyan, Rodrigo Vivi, stable On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:22:10PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Display WA #1183 was recently added to workaround > "Failures when enabling DPLL0 with eDP link rate 2.16 > or 4.32 GHz and CD clock frequency 308.57 or 617.14 MHz > (CDCLK_CTL CD Frequency Select 10b or 11b) used in this > enabling or in previous enabling." > > This workaround was designed to minimize the impact only > to save the bad case with that link rates. But HW engineers > indicated that it should be safe to apply broadly, although > they were expecting the DPLL0 link rate to be unchanged on > runtime. > > We need to cover 2 cases: when we are in fact enabling DPLL0 > and when we are just changing the frequency with small > differences. > > This is based on previous patch by Rodrigo Vivi with suggestions > from Ville Syrj�l�. > > Cc: Arthur J Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com> > Cc: Ville Syrj�l� <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Hmm. This is v4, but it was posted after v5? You didn't include a changelog in the commit message so I have no idea what is the difference between these versions. They appear similar on a first glance. The changes here *look* correct to me, so Reviewed-by: Ville Syrj�l� <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> But I'm not going to push this right now because I'm too confused about the version of the patch. I'll be out for a few weeks so if the confusion is lifted during that time and you want this in please poke at someone else to push it. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > index 09bf043c1c2e..73335e709ed6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > @@ -7021,6 +7021,7 @@ enum { > #define RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE (1<<4) > > #define GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1 _MMIO(0x46430) > +#define SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT (1<<30) > #define MASK_WAKEMEM (1<<13) > > #define SKL_DFSM _MMIO(0x51000) > @@ -8575,6 +8576,7 @@ enum skl_power_gate { > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_2 (2<<22) > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_4 (3<<22) > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe) ((pipe)<<20) > +#define CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE (1<<19) > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(3) > #define BXT_CDCLK_SSA_PRECHARGE_ENABLE (1<<16) > #define CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK (0x7ff) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > index 9c5ceb98d48f..d77e2bec1e29 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > @@ -931,16 +931,10 @@ static void skl_set_preferred_cdclk_vco(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > static void skl_dpll0_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int vco) > { > - int min_cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, vco); > u32 val; > > WARN_ON(vco != 8100000 && vco != 8640000); > > - /* select the minimum CDCLK before enabling DPLL 0 */ > - val = CDCLK_FREQ_337_308 | skl_cdclk_decimal(min_cdclk); > - I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val); > - POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > - > /* > * We always enable DPLL0 with the lowest link rate possible, but still > * taking into account the VCO required to operate the eDP panel at the > @@ -994,7 +988,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > { > int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk; > int vco = cdclk_state->vco; > - u32 freq_select; > + u32 freq_select, cdclk_ctl; > int ret; > > mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock); > @@ -1009,7 +1003,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > return; > } > > - /* set CDCLK_CTL */ > + /* Choose frequency for this cdclk */ > switch (cdclk) { > default: > WARN_ON(cdclk != dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref); > @@ -1036,10 +1030,33 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) > skl_dpll0_disable(dev_priv); > > + cdclk_ctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > + > + if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) { > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > + cdclk_ctl &= ~(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK | CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK); > + cdclk_ctl |= freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk); > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > + } > + > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > + cdclk_ctl |= CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE; > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > + POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > + > if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) > skl_dpll0_enable(dev_priv, vco); > > - I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk)); > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > + cdclk_ctl &= ~(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK | CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK); > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > + > + cdclk_ctl |= freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk); > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > + > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > + cdclk_ctl &= ~CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE; > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > > /* inform PCU of the change */ > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > index 8315499452dc..35796fa8e6b4 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > @@ -598,6 +598,11 @@ void gen9_enable_dc5(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling DC5\n"); > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > + if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) > + I915_WRITE(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, I915_READ(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) | > + SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT); > + > gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5); > } > > @@ -625,6 +630,11 @@ void skl_disable_dc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > { > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling DC6\n"); > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > + if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) > + I915_WRITE(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, I915_READ(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) | > + SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT); > + > gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE); > } > > -- > 2.14.3 -- Ville Syrj�l� Intel OTC ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl 2017-12-22 19:58 ` Ville Syrjälä (?) @ 2017-12-22 21:06 ` De Marchi, Lucas 2017-12-22 21:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi -1 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: De Marchi, Lucas @ 2017-12-22 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Runyan, Arthur J, Vivi, Rodrigo, stable@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 21:58 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:22:10PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > Display WA #1183 was recently added to workaround > > "Failures when enabling DPLL0 with eDP link rate 2.16 > > or 4.32 GHz and CD clock frequency 308.57 or 617.14 MHz > > (CDCLK_CTL CD Frequency Select 10b or 11b) used in this > > enabling or in previous enabling." > > > > This workaround was designed to minimize the impact only > > to save the bad case with that link rates. But HW engineers > > indicated that it should be safe to apply broadly, although > > they were expecting the DPLL0 link rate to be unchanged on > > runtime. > > > > We need to cover 2 cases: when we are in fact enabling DPLL0 > > and when we are just changing the frequency with small > > differences. > > > > This is based on previous patch by Rodrigo Vivi with suggestions > > from Ville Syrjälä. > > > > Cc: Arthur J Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> > > Hmm. This is v4, but it was posted after v5? > > You didn't include a changelog in the commit message so I have no idea > what is the difference between these versions. They appear similar on a > first glance. Sorry about the confusion. What happened is that first I was using the version number accounting for the initial version Rodrigo sent. However, later I ended up using the version from patchwork, which don't take Rodrigo's initial version into account, even if the subject is the same. The diff is only the CC to stable with additional commits to cherry-pick on stable versions as requested by Jani. Lucas De Marchi > The changes here *look* correct to me, so > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > But I'm not going to push this right now because I'm too confused about > the version of the patch. I'll be out for a few weeks so if the > confusion is lifted during that time and you want this in please poke > at someone else to push it. > > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > ------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 10 ++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > index 09bf043c1c2e..73335e709ed6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > @@ -7021,6 +7021,7 @@ enum { > > #define RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE (1<<4) > > > > #define GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1 _MMIO(0x46430) > > +#define SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT (1<<30) > > #define MASK_WAKEMEM (1<<13) > > > > #define SKL_DFSM _MMIO(0x51000) > > @@ -8575,6 +8576,7 @@ enum skl_power_gate { > > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_2 (2<<22) > > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_4 (3<<22) > > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe) ((pipe)<<20) > > +#define CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE (1<<19) > > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(3) > > #define BXT_CDCLK_SSA_PRECHARGE_ENABLE (1<<16) > > #define CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK (0x7ff) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > > index 9c5ceb98d48f..d77e2bec1e29 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > > @@ -931,16 +931,10 @@ static void skl_set_preferred_cdclk_vco(struct > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > > > static void skl_dpll0_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int vco) > > { > > - int min_cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, vco); > > u32 val; > > > > WARN_ON(vco != 8100000 && vco != 8640000); > > > > - /* select the minimum CDCLK before enabling DPLL 0 */ > > - val = CDCLK_FREQ_337_308 | skl_cdclk_decimal(min_cdclk); > > - I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val); > > - POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > > - > > /* > > * We always enable DPLL0 with the lowest link rate possible, but > > still > > * taking into account the VCO required to operate the eDP panel > > at the > > @@ -994,7 +988,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private > > *dev_priv, > > { > > int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk; > > int vco = cdclk_state->vco; > > - u32 freq_select; > > + u32 freq_select, cdclk_ctl; > > int ret; > > > > mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock); > > @@ -1009,7 +1003,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private > > *dev_priv, > > return; > > } > > > > - /* set CDCLK_CTL */ > > + /* Choose frequency for this cdclk */ > > switch (cdclk) { > > default: > > WARN_ON(cdclk != dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref); > > @@ -1036,10 +1030,33 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private > > *dev_priv, > > dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) > > skl_dpll0_disable(dev_priv); > > > > + cdclk_ctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > > + > > + if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) { > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > + cdclk_ctl &= ~(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK | > > CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK); > > + cdclk_ctl |= freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk); > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > + } > > + > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > + cdclk_ctl |= CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE; > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > + POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > > + > > if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) > > skl_dpll0_enable(dev_priv, vco); > > > > - I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk)); > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > + cdclk_ctl &= ~(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK | CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK); > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > + > > + cdclk_ctl |= freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk); > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > + > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > + cdclk_ctl &= ~CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE; > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > > > > /* inform PCU of the change */ > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > > index 8315499452dc..35796fa8e6b4 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > > @@ -598,6 +598,11 @@ void gen9_enable_dc5(struct drm_i915_private > > *dev_priv) > > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling DC5\n"); > > > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > + if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) > > + I915_WRITE(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, > > I915_READ(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) | > > + SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT); > > + > > gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5); > > } > > > > @@ -625,6 +630,11 @@ void skl_disable_dc6(struct drm_i915_private > > *dev_priv) > > { > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling DC6\n"); > > > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > + if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) > > + I915_WRITE(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, > > I915_READ(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) | > > + SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT); > > + > > gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE); > > } > > > > -- > > 2.14.3 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl 2017-12-22 21:06 ` De Marchi, Lucas @ 2017-12-22 21:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Rodrigo Vivi @ 2017-12-22 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: De Marchi, Lucas Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Runyan, Arthur J, stable@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:06:28PM +0000, De Marchi, Lucas wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 21:58 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:22:10PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > > Display WA #1183 was recently added to workaround > > > "Failures when enabling DPLL0 with eDP link rate 2.16 > > > or 4.32 GHz and CD clock frequency 308.57 or 617.14 MHz > > > (CDCLK_CTL CD Frequency Select 10b or 11b) used in this > > > enabling or in previous enabling." > > > > > > This workaround was designed to minimize the impact only > > > to save the bad case with that link rates. But HW engineers > > > indicated that it should be safe to apply broadly, although > > > they were expecting the DPLL0 link rate to be unchanged on > > > runtime. > > > > > > We need to cover 2 cases: when we are in fact enabling DPLL0 > > > and when we are just changing the frequency with small > > > differences. > > > > > > This is based on previous patch by Rodrigo Vivi with suggestions > > > from Ville Syrjälä. > > > > > > Cc: Arthur J Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com> > > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> > > > > Hmm. This is v4, but it was posted after v5? > > > > You didn't include a changelog in the commit message so I have no idea > > what is the difference between these versions. They appear similar on a > > first glance. > > Sorry about the confusion. What happened is that first I was using the version > number accounting for the initial version Rodrigo sent. However, later I ended > up using the version from patchwork, which don't take Rodrigo's initial > version into account, even if the subject is the same. > > The diff is only the CC to stable with additional commits to cherry-pick on > stable versions as requested by Jani. > > Lucas De Marchi Pushed to dinq. First patch to 4.17 :) Thanks for patches, reviews, confirmations, etc! > > > The changes here *look* correct to me, so > > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > > > But I'm not going to push this right now because I'm too confused about > > the version of the patch. I'll be out for a few weeks so if the > > confusion is lifted during that time and you want this in please poke > > at someone else to push it. > > > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > ------- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 10 ++++++++++ > > > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > index 09bf043c1c2e..73335e709ed6 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > @@ -7021,6 +7021,7 @@ enum { > > > #define RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE (1<<4) > > > > > > #define GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1 _MMIO(0x46430) > > > +#define SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT (1<<30) > > > #define MASK_WAKEMEM (1<<13) > > > > > > #define SKL_DFSM _MMIO(0x51000) > > > @@ -8575,6 +8576,7 @@ enum skl_power_gate { > > > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_2 (2<<22) > > > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_4 (3<<22) > > > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe) ((pipe)<<20) > > > +#define CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE (1<<19) > > > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(3) > > > #define BXT_CDCLK_SSA_PRECHARGE_ENABLE (1<<16) > > > #define CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK (0x7ff) > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > > > index 9c5ceb98d48f..d77e2bec1e29 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > > > @@ -931,16 +931,10 @@ static void skl_set_preferred_cdclk_vco(struct > > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > > > > > static void skl_dpll0_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int vco) > > > { > > > - int min_cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, vco); > > > u32 val; > > > > > > WARN_ON(vco != 8100000 && vco != 8640000); > > > > > > - /* select the minimum CDCLK before enabling DPLL 0 */ > > > - val = CDCLK_FREQ_337_308 | skl_cdclk_decimal(min_cdclk); > > > - I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val); > > > - POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > > > - > > > /* > > > * We always enable DPLL0 with the lowest link rate possible, but > > > still > > > * taking into account the VCO required to operate the eDP panel > > > at the > > > @@ -994,7 +988,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private > > > *dev_priv, > > > { > > > int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk; > > > int vco = cdclk_state->vco; > > > - u32 freq_select; > > > + u32 freq_select, cdclk_ctl; > > > int ret; > > > > > > mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock); > > > @@ -1009,7 +1003,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private > > > *dev_priv, > > > return; > > > } > > > > > > - /* set CDCLK_CTL */ > > > + /* Choose frequency for this cdclk */ > > > switch (cdclk) { > > > default: > > > WARN_ON(cdclk != dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref); > > > @@ -1036,10 +1030,33 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private > > > *dev_priv, > > > dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) > > > skl_dpll0_disable(dev_priv); > > > > > > + cdclk_ctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > > > + > > > + if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) { > > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > > + cdclk_ctl &= ~(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK | > > > CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK); > > > + cdclk_ctl |= freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk); > > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > > + } > > > + > > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > > + cdclk_ctl |= CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE; > > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > > + POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > > > + > > > if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) > > > skl_dpll0_enable(dev_priv, vco); > > > > > > - I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk)); > > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > > + cdclk_ctl &= ~(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK | CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK); > > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > > + > > > + cdclk_ctl |= freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk); > > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > > + > > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > > + cdclk_ctl &= ~CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE; > > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > > POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > > > > > > /* inform PCU of the change */ > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > > > index 8315499452dc..35796fa8e6b4 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > > > @@ -598,6 +598,11 @@ void gen9_enable_dc5(struct drm_i915_private > > > *dev_priv) > > > > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling DC5\n"); > > > > > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > > + if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) > > > + I915_WRITE(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, > > > I915_READ(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) | > > > + SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT); > > > + > > > gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5); > > > } > > > > > > @@ -625,6 +630,11 @@ void skl_disable_dc6(struct drm_i915_private > > > *dev_priv) > > > { > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling DC6\n"); > > > > > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > > + if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) > > > + I915_WRITE(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, > > > I915_READ(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) | > > > + SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT); > > > + > > > gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE); > > > } > > > > > > -- > > > 2.14.3 > > > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl @ 2017-12-22 21:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Rodrigo Vivi @ 2017-12-22 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: De Marchi, Lucas Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Runyan, Arthur J, stable@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:06:28PM +0000, De Marchi, Lucas wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 21:58 +0200, Ville Syrj�l� wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:22:10PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > > Display WA #1183 was recently added to workaround > > > "Failures when enabling DPLL0 with eDP link rate 2.16 > > > or 4.32 GHz and CD clock frequency 308.57 or 617.14 MHz > > > (CDCLK_CTL CD Frequency Select 10b or 11b) used in this > > > enabling or in previous enabling." > > > > > > This workaround was designed to minimize the impact only > > > to save the bad case with that link rates. But HW engineers > > > indicated that it should be safe to apply broadly, although > > > they were expecting the DPLL0 link rate to be unchanged on > > > runtime. > > > > > > We need to cover 2 cases: when we are in fact enabling DPLL0 > > > and when we are just changing the frequency with small > > > differences. > > > > > > This is based on previous patch by Rodrigo Vivi with suggestions > > > from Ville Syrj�l�. > > > > > > Cc: Arthur J Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com> > > > Cc: Ville Syrj�l� <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> > > > > Hmm. This is v4, but it was posted after v5? > > > > You didn't include a changelog in the commit message so I have no idea > > what is the difference between these versions. They appear similar on a > > first glance. > > Sorry about the confusion. What happened is that first I was using the version > number accounting for the initial version Rodrigo sent. However, later I ended > up using the version from patchwork, which don't take Rodrigo's initial > version into account, even if the subject is the same. > > The diff is only the CC to stable with additional commits to cherry-pick on > stable versions as requested by Jani. > > Lucas De Marchi Pushed to dinq. First patch to 4.17 :) Thanks for patches, reviews, confirmations, etc! > > > The changes here *look* correct to me, so > > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrj�l� <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > > > But I'm not going to push this right now because I'm too confused about > > the version of the patch. I'll be out for a few weeks so if the > > confusion is lifted during that time and you want this in please poke > > at someone else to push it. > > > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > ------- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 10 ++++++++++ > > > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > index 09bf043c1c2e..73335e709ed6 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > @@ -7021,6 +7021,7 @@ enum { > > > #define RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE (1<<4) > > > > > > #define GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1 _MMIO(0x46430) > > > +#define SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT (1<<30) > > > #define MASK_WAKEMEM (1<<13) > > > > > > #define SKL_DFSM _MMIO(0x51000) > > > @@ -8575,6 +8576,7 @@ enum skl_power_gate { > > > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_2 (2<<22) > > > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_4 (3<<22) > > > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe) ((pipe)<<20) > > > +#define CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE (1<<19) > > > #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(3) > > > #define BXT_CDCLK_SSA_PRECHARGE_ENABLE (1<<16) > > > #define CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK (0x7ff) > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > > > index 9c5ceb98d48f..d77e2bec1e29 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c > > > @@ -931,16 +931,10 @@ static void skl_set_preferred_cdclk_vco(struct > > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > > > > > static void skl_dpll0_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int vco) > > > { > > > - int min_cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, vco); > > > u32 val; > > > > > > WARN_ON(vco != 8100000 && vco != 8640000); > > > > > > - /* select the minimum CDCLK before enabling DPLL 0 */ > > > - val = CDCLK_FREQ_337_308 | skl_cdclk_decimal(min_cdclk); > > > - I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val); > > > - POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > > > - > > > /* > > > * We always enable DPLL0 with the lowest link rate possible, but > > > still > > > * taking into account the VCO required to operate the eDP panel > > > at the > > > @@ -994,7 +988,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private > > > *dev_priv, > > > { > > > int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk; > > > int vco = cdclk_state->vco; > > > - u32 freq_select; > > > + u32 freq_select, cdclk_ctl; > > > int ret; > > > > > > mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock); > > > @@ -1009,7 +1003,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private > > > *dev_priv, > > > return; > > > } > > > > > > - /* set CDCLK_CTL */ > > > + /* Choose frequency for this cdclk */ > > > switch (cdclk) { > > > default: > > > WARN_ON(cdclk != dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref); > > > @@ -1036,10 +1030,33 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private > > > *dev_priv, > > > dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) > > > skl_dpll0_disable(dev_priv); > > > > > > + cdclk_ctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > > > + > > > + if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) { > > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > > + cdclk_ctl &= ~(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK | > > > CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK); > > > + cdclk_ctl |= freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk); > > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > > + } > > > + > > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > > + cdclk_ctl |= CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE; > > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > > + POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > > > + > > > if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) > > > skl_dpll0_enable(dev_priv, vco); > > > > > > - I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk)); > > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > > + cdclk_ctl &= ~(CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK | CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK); > > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > > + > > > + cdclk_ctl |= freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk); > > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > > + > > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > > + cdclk_ctl &= ~CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE; > > > + I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, cdclk_ctl); > > > POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > > > > > > /* inform PCU of the change */ > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > > > index 8315499452dc..35796fa8e6b4 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > > > @@ -598,6 +598,11 @@ void gen9_enable_dc5(struct drm_i915_private > > > *dev_priv) > > > > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling DC5\n"); > > > > > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > > + if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) > > > + I915_WRITE(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, > > > I915_READ(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) | > > > + SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT); > > > + > > > gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5); > > > } > > > > > > @@ -625,6 +630,11 @@ void skl_disable_dc6(struct drm_i915_private > > > *dev_priv) > > > { > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling DC6\n"); > > > > > > + /* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */ > > > + if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) > > > + I915_WRITE(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, > > > I915_READ(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) | > > > + SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT); > > > + > > > gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE); > > > } > > > > > > -- > > > 2.14.3 > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-22 21:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-12-04 23:22 [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl Lucas De Marchi 2017-12-04 23:42 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork 2017-12-05 0:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork 2017-12-22 19:58 ` [PATCH v4] " Ville Syrjälä 2017-12-22 19:58 ` Ville Syrjälä 2017-12-22 21:06 ` De Marchi, Lucas 2017-12-22 21:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi 2017-12-22 21:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.