From: dledford@redhat.com (Doug Ledford)
Subject: Reconnect on RDMA device reset
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:24:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1517333096.27592.281.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADZhsQpWXQQ2dKxAorGMhk7HFvqoQ2Y5LxVKt66XjkcUbEuXpA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2018-01-30@17:03 +0200, Oren Duer wrote:
> Not sure why we need to keep track whether it is the same device or not.
> I fail to understand why we trust the system admin to create the connections
> at the beginning, but we should not trust him anymore if the device was
> removed, a new device was added in place of it, and it was configured with the
> same network IP/subnet. To me it looks like the admin wanted exactly that:
> for the connections to be restored over the new device.
In my original email, I pointed out that I didn't know how the NVMe over
Fabrics was doing addressing. If it were like SRP, then it wouldn't
work because the device GUID is part of the addressing scheme, so a new
device wouldn't automatically show as matching that address. If,
however, you use IP like iSER, then yes, I agree fully you can just test
the ability to route over the new device using the IP address and
restore if it works.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford at redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/attachments/20180130/52de7d54/attachment.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Oren Duer <oren.duer-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi-NQWnxTmZq1alnMjI0IkVqw@public.gmane.org>,
linux-nvme-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
"linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Oren Duer <oren-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Reconnect on RDMA device reset
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:24:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1517333096.27592.281.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADZhsQpWXQQ2dKxAorGMhk7HFvqoQ2Y5LxVKt66XjkcUbEuXpA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1129 bytes --]
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 17:03 +0200, Oren Duer wrote:
> Not sure why we need to keep track whether it is the same device or not.
> I fail to understand why we trust the system admin to create the connections
> at the beginning, but we should not trust him anymore if the device was
> removed, a new device was added in place of it, and it was configured with the
> same network IP/subnet. To me it looks like the admin wanted exactly that:
> for the connections to be restored over the new device.
In my original email, I pointed out that I didn't know how the NVMe over
Fabrics was doing addressing. If it were like SRP, then it wouldn't
work because the device GUID is part of the addressing scheme, so a new
device wouldn't automatically show as matching that address. If,
however, you use IP like iSER, then yes, I agree fully you can just test
the ability to route over the new device using the IP address and
restore if it works.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-30 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-22 15:07 Reconnect on RDMA device reset Oren Duer
2018-01-23 12:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-01-23 12:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-01-24 7:41 ` Oren Duer
2018-01-24 7:41 ` Oren Duer
2018-01-24 20:52 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-01-24 20:52 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-01-25 14:10 ` Oren Duer
2018-01-25 14:10 ` Oren Duer
2018-01-29 19:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-01-29 19:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-01-25 18:13 ` Doug Ledford
2018-01-25 18:13 ` Doug Ledford
2018-01-25 19:06 ` Chuck Lever
2018-01-25 19:06 ` Chuck Lever
2018-01-29 20:01 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-01-29 20:01 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-01-29 20:11 ` Chuck Lever
2018-01-29 20:11 ` Chuck Lever
2018-01-29 21:27 ` Doug Ledford
2018-01-29 21:27 ` Doug Ledford
2018-01-29 21:46 ` Chuck Lever
2018-01-29 21:46 ` Chuck Lever
2018-01-25 22:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-01-25 22:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-01-29 20:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-01-29 20:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-01-29 21:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-29 21:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-29 22:28 ` Doug Ledford
2018-01-29 22:28 ` Doug Ledford
2018-01-30 15:03 ` Oren Duer
2018-01-30 15:03 ` Oren Duer
2018-01-30 17:24 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2018-01-30 17:24 ` Doug Ledford
2018-01-30 17:51 ` Steve Wise
2018-01-30 17:51 ` Steve Wise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1517333096.27592.281.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.