From: toshi.kani@hpe.com (Kani, Toshi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC patch] ioremap: don't set up huge I/O mappings when p4d/pud/pmd is zero
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:34:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519175992.16384.121.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <861128ce-966f-7006-45ba-6a7298918686@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 14:54 +0530, Chintan Pandya wrote:
>
> On 12/28/2017 4:54 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> >
> > When we using iounmap() to free the 4K mapping, it just clear the PTEs
> > but leave P4D/PUD/PMD unchanged, also will not free the memory of page
> > tables.
> >
> > This will cause issues on ARM64 platform (not sure if other archs have
> > the same issue) for this case:
> >
> > 1. ioremap a 4K size, valid page table will build,
> > 2. iounmap it, pte0 will set to 0;
> > 3. ioremap the same address with 2M size, pgd/pmd is unchanged,
> > then set the a new value for pmd;
> > 4. pte0 is leaked;
> > 5. CPU may meet exception because the old pmd is still in TLB,
> > which will lead to kernel panic.
> >
> > Fix it by skip setting up the huge I/O mappings when p4d/pud/pmd is
> > zero.
> >
>
> One obvious problem I see here is, once any 2nd level entry has 3rd
> level mapping, this entry can't map 2M section ever in future. This way,
> we will fragment entire virtual space over time.
>
> The code you are changing is common between 32-bit systems as well (I
> think). And running out of section mapping would be a reality in
> practical terms.
>
> So, if we can do the following as a fix up, we would be saved.
> 1) Invalidate 2nd level entry from TLB, and
> 2) Free the page which holds last level page table
>
> BTW, is there any further discussion going on this topic which I am
> missing ?
Yes, I suggested to free up a pte table in my last reply.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10134581/
Thanks,
-Toshi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kani, Toshi" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"cpandya@codeaurora.org" <cpandya@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"guohanjun@huawei.com" <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: "linuxarm@huawei.com" <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"wxf.wang@hisilicon.com" <wxf.wang@hisilicon.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Hocko, Michal" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"hanjun.guo@linaro.org" <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch] ioremap: don't set up huge I/O mappings when p4d/pud/pmd is zero
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:34:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519175992.16384.121.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <861128ce-966f-7006-45ba-6a7298918686@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 14:54 +0530, Chintan Pandya wrote:
>
> On 12/28/2017 4:54 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> >
> > When we using iounmap() to free the 4K mapping, it just clear the PTEs
> > but leave P4D/PUD/PMD unchanged, also will not free the memory of page
> > tables.
> >
> > This will cause issues on ARM64 platform (not sure if other archs have
> > the same issue) for this case:
> >
> > 1. ioremap a 4K size, valid page table will build,
> > 2. iounmap it, pte0 will set to 0;
> > 3. ioremap the same address with 2M size, pgd/pmd is unchanged,
> > then set the a new value for pmd;
> > 4. pte0 is leaked;
> > 5. CPU may meet exception because the old pmd is still in TLB,
> > which will lead to kernel panic.
> >
> > Fix it by skip setting up the huge I/O mappings when p4d/pud/pmd is
> > zero.
> >
>
> One obvious problem I see here is, once any 2nd level entry has 3rd
> level mapping, this entry can't map 2M section ever in future. This way,
> we will fragment entire virtual space over time.
>
> The code you are changing is common between 32-bit systems as well (I
> think). And running out of section mapping would be a reality in
> practical terms.
>
> So, if we can do the following as a fix up, we would be saved.
> 1) Invalidate 2nd level entry from TLB, and
> 2) Free the page which holds last level page table
>
> BTW, is there any further discussion going on this topic which I am
> missing ?
Yes, I suggested to free up a pte table in my last reply.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10134581/
Thanks,
-Toshi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-21 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-28 11:24 [RFC patch] ioremap: don't set up huge I/O mappings when p4d/pud/pmd is zero Hanjun Guo
2017-12-28 11:24 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-12-28 11:24 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-12-29 8:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-12-29 8:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-12-29 8:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-01-05 22:15 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-01-05 22:15 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-01-06 9:46 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-01-06 9:46 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-01-06 9:46 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-01-08 23:36 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-01-08 23:36 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-01-08 23:36 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-02-20 9:24 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-02-20 9:24 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-02-20 9:24 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-02-21 0:34 ` Kani, Toshi [this message]
2018-02-21 0:34 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-02-21 7:36 ` 答复: " Wangxuefeng (E)
2018-02-21 11:57 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-21 11:57 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-21 11:57 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-21 12:47 ` 答复: " Wangxuefeng (E)
2018-02-26 10:57 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-02-26 10:57 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-02-26 11:04 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-26 11:04 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-26 11:04 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-26 12:53 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-02-26 12:53 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-02-27 19:49 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-02-27 19:49 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-02-27 19:59 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-27 19:59 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-27 19:59 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-27 20:02 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-02-27 20:02 ` Kani, Toshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1519175992.16384.121.camel@hpe.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.