Re: Documentation problems

[Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>]

On Sunday 27 November 2011 17:58:00 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> What is the problem with being it a wiki (probably with authorized users to
> avoid spam).
> 
> I'd say let everyone who wants to contribute.
> If someone makes a mistake it can easily be corrected and/or reverted, and
> if someone messes things up on purpose and/or creates more bad than good
> such a (non)contributor can be banned.
> 
> Disadvantage of a pull model is:
> - more difficult to make changes (e.g. if I see a typo in a wiki and I have
> write permission, I'll fix it; however if it invokes checking out a file,
> make the edit, commit it, mail a pull request, most likely I'll decide it
> is not worth the effort
> - more administrative workload (that is probably better spent on actually
> doing things).
> - It sends out a message of distrust. Not really a good way to create
> involvement.
> 
> One might feel that it improves quality; then again also in a wiki one can
> review and improve (or revert) changes.
> 
> As far as I see it we are all adults (at least I think so) all interested
> in improving OE so no unnecessary barriers should be raised.
> 
> Frans.
> 
> PS: it is quite possible to backup a wiki (and I hope this is done at
> regular intervals with our wiki). Also all edits are recorded so they can
> always be tracked back and (if needed) undone.

I agree with all of this. We shouldn't be putting more barriers up to 
contributing to the documentation - there are already enough.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre