All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Documentation problems
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:23:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <javjts$6f8$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+M6bXnQN9Q62w22sjiVaqkdipaXPgujR_FTWPE8N24z=MAW4A@mail.gmail.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 28-11-11 06:11, Tom Rini schreef:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> Op 27-11-11 03:40, Tom Rini schreef:
>>> Hey all,
>>> 
>>> As things stand today, the wiki is out of date and a number of folks 
>>> refuse to work on it.
>> 
>> Does it actually need to be a wiki? Or rather: do web edits need to
>> show up immediately?
> 
> If spam is eliminated, does it still matter, today?

Ever since OE was founded the information in the wikis has been terrible.
The information in the docbook was accurate, but didn't cover everything.


>>> Paul Menzel has mentioned that ikiwiki has been mentioned before and
>>> that lets us have the website in a repository.  Do folks have other
>>> ideas?
>> 
>> I really like the idea of storing the content in git since it gives us
>> 2 things we need for documentation: backups and a pull model.
> 
> The number one thing we lack today is people willing to document.

I'd change that to "knowledgable people"

> Everyone, myself included, who has said we need X done to the public 
> documentation today, has generally found a point at which they stop 
> wanting to keep things up to date.  Why?  What would change that?

I stopped working on the OE wiki because I couldn't keep up with people
adding anecdotal, but misleading information into it.

> Does anyone reading this know people that _like_ editing wikis?  Can we
> ask them what keeps them engaged in the process?

People in general like editing wikis, yes. The problem with OE is that it is
such niche product and has a steep learning curve as well. It does not lend
itself to drive-by editing like e.g. wikipedia.

How about this:

Proposal a:

1) fork the poky/yocto docbook based manual
2) run a sed script to change it to an OE branded version
3) convert it to a wiki

proposal b:

1) fork the poky/yocto docbook based manual
2) run a sed script to change it to an OE branded version
3) put it in git, webpages get updated with a git-hook

If people want to use a webbrowser to edit it:
https://github.com/blog/844-forking-with-the-edit-button
If we have setup the github mirror correctly the pull request will arrive on
the mailinglist automatically.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAk7TUvoACgkQMkyGM64RGpGqZACgoputgxl8LxHT0bipoA0gdWpV
kzEAnA3mTcKxrfsH3a4M1jTnGHACa6VL
=PMji
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-28  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-27  2:40 Documentation problems Tom Rini
2011-11-27  9:58 ` [RFC] Documentation problems and future plans Paul Menzel
2011-11-27 15:51   ` Chris Larson
2011-11-27 14:29 ` Documentation problems Paul Eggleton
2011-11-27 15:53   ` Chris Larson
2011-11-27 16:58     ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-27 17:06       ` Paul Eggleton
2011-11-27 18:38         ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-27 18:56           ` Paul Eggleton
2011-11-27 19:06             ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-27 21:49               ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-27 22:00                 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-27 15:44 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-28  5:11   ` Tom Rini
2011-11-28  6:36     ` Chris Verges
2011-11-28  9:23     ` Koen Kooi [this message]
2011-11-28 12:19       ` Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
2011-11-28 13:40     ` Paul Eggleton
2011-11-28 14:40     ` Samuel Stirtzel
2011-11-28 10:30 ` Phil Blundell
2011-11-28 11:07   ` Richard Purdie
2011-11-28 11:16     ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-28 13:33       ` Philip Balister
2011-11-28 13:36         ` Philip Balister
2011-11-28 14:06           ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-28 18:02     ` Bernhard Guillon
2011-11-28 21:13       ` Tom Rini
2011-11-29  8:24       ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-29 20:17         ` Khem Raj
2011-11-29 21:46           ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-29 23:37             ` Tom Rini
2011-11-30  7:06               ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-28 17:44 ` Bernhard Guillon
2011-12-07  5:01   ` Bill Traynor
2011-12-07 22:17     ` Khem Raj
2011-11-30 15:49 ` Rainer Koenig
2011-11-30 17:06   ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-30 17:32   ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
2011-11-30 18:46   ` Paul Menzel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-20 17:58 Bruce Korb
2009-09-20 18:24 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-09-20 18:37   ` Bruce Korb
2009-09-20 18:45     ` Matthieu Moy
2009-09-20 20:52 ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='javjts$6f8$1@dough.gmane.org' \
    --to=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.