All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Evgeniy Didin <Evgeniy.Didin@synopsys.com>
To: "adrian.hunter@intel.com" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: "ulf.hansson@linaro.org" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	"linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jh80.chung@samsung.com" <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
	"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
	Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>
Subject: mmc: block: bonnie++ runs with errors on arc/hsdk board
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:04:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520942674.10285.8.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)

Hello Adrian,

I have discovered, that beggining with 4.16-rc1 bonnie++ benchmark
runs with errors on arc/hsdk board. After bisecting between 4.15 and 4.16-rc1,
I have found that errors started after 
commit 81196976ed94 (mmc: block: Add blk-mq support).

Error message is like:

| # bonnie++ -u root -r 256 -s 512 -x 1 -d  /mnt 
| Using uid:0, gid:0.
| Writing with putc()...random: crng init done
| done
| Writing intelligently...INFO: task kworker/u8:0:5 blocked for more than 10 seconds.
|      Not tainted 4.15.0-rc3-00012-g81196976ed94-dirty #1
| "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
| kworker/u8:0    D    0     5      2 0x00000000
| Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-179:0)
|
| Stack Trace:
|  __switch_to+0x0/0xac
|  __schedule+0x1b8/0x738
|  io_schedule+0x5c/0xc0
|  bit_wait_io+0xc/0x48
|  out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x78/0xc0
|  do_get_write_access+0x1aa/0x4cc
|  jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x32/0x74
|  __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3a/0xac
|  ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used+0x66/0x5b0
|  ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x1ee/0x830
|  ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x504/0xcac
|  ext4_map_blocks+0x262/0x5e8
|  mpage_map_and_submit_extent+0xb8/0x648
|  ext4_writepages+0x5ce/0x6b4
|  do_writepages+0x20/0x84
|  __writeback_single_inode+0x2a/0x154
|  wb_writeback+0x538/0xae0
|  wb_workfn+0x17c/0x334
|  process_one_work+0x1a6/0x350
|  worker_thread+0xf2/0x478
|  kthread+0x120/0x13c
|  ret_from_fork+0x18/0x1c

There are some details of hsdk_defconfig presented bellow:

SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR=y
DETECT_HUNG_TASK=y
DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT=10
MMC_DW=y
MMC_DW_PLTFM=y

I have also tested bonnie++ on Wandboard on v4.16-rc5 with the same
DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT=10, but there were no errors.

Even though it is not critical error and we see bonnie++ test proceeds to the end,
still it is strange, that some process is running in kernel space for a long time (at least 10sec).
What is strange, before metioned commit I can't reproduce this behaviour.

I am wondering is this expected behaviour? 

Best regards,
Evgeniy Didin
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Evgeniy.Didin@synopsys.com (Evgeniy Didin)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: mmc: block: bonnie++ runs with errors on arc/hsdk board
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:04:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520942674.10285.8.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)

Hello Adrian,

I have discovered, that beggining with 4.16-rc1 bonnie++ benchmark
runs with errors on arc/hsdk board. After bisecting between 4.15 and 4.16-rc1,
I have found that errors started after?
commit 81196976ed94 (mmc: block: Add blk-mq support).

Error message is like:

| # bonnie++ -u root -r 256 -s 512 -x 1 -d??/mnt?
| Using uid:0, gid:0.
| Writing with putc()...random: crng init done
| done
| Writing intelligently...INFO: task kworker/u8:0:5 blocked for more than 10 seconds.
|??????Not tainted 4.15.0-rc3-00012-g81196976ed94-dirty #1
| "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
| kworker/u8:0????D????0?????5??????2 0x00000000
| Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-179:0)
|
| Stack Trace:
|??__switch_to+0x0/0xac
|??__schedule+0x1b8/0x738
|??io_schedule+0x5c/0xc0
|??bit_wait_io+0xc/0x48
|??out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x78/0xc0
|??do_get_write_access+0x1aa/0x4cc
|??jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x32/0x74
|??__ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3a/0xac
|??ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used+0x66/0x5b0
|??ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x1ee/0x830
|??ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x504/0xcac
|??ext4_map_blocks+0x262/0x5e8
|??mpage_map_and_submit_extent+0xb8/0x648
|??ext4_writepages+0x5ce/0x6b4
|??do_writepages+0x20/0x84
|??__writeback_single_inode+0x2a/0x154
|??wb_writeback+0x538/0xae0
|??wb_workfn+0x17c/0x334
|??process_one_work+0x1a6/0x350
|??worker_thread+0xf2/0x478
|??kthread+0x120/0x13c
|??ret_from_fork+0x18/0x1c

There are some details of hsdk_defconfig presented bellow:

SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR=y
DETECT_HUNG_TASK=y
DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT=10
MMC_DW=y
MMC_DW_PLTFM=y

I have also tested bonnie++ on Wandboard on v4.16-rc5 with the same
DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT=10, but there were no errors.

Even though it is not critical error and we see bonnie++ test proceeds to the end,
still it is strange, that some process is running in kernel space for a long time (at least 10sec).
What is strange, before metioned commit I can't reproduce this behaviour.

I am wondering is this expected behaviour??

Best regards,
Evgeniy Didin

             reply	other threads:[~2018-03-13 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-13 12:04 Evgeniy Didin [this message]
2018-03-13 12:04 ` mmc: block: bonnie++ runs with errors on arc/hsdk board Evgeniy Didin
2018-03-13 14:05 ` Adrian Hunter
2018-03-13 14:05   ` Adrian Hunter
2018-03-13 15:56   ` Evgeniy Didin
2018-03-13 15:56     ` Evgeniy Didin
2018-03-14 12:32     ` Evgeniy Didin
2018-03-14 12:32       ` Evgeniy Didin
2018-03-15  9:27       ` Adrian Hunter
2018-03-15  9:27         ` Adrian Hunter
2018-03-15 15:08         ` Evgeniy Didin
2018-03-15 15:08           ` Evgeniy Didin
2018-03-16 12:12           ` Adrian Hunter
2018-03-16 12:12             ` Adrian Hunter
2018-03-16 17:10             ` Evgeniy Didin
2018-03-16 17:10               ` Evgeniy Didin
2018-03-20  8:29               ` Adrian Hunter
2018-03-20  8:29                 ` Adrian Hunter
2018-03-15 16:38         ` Vineet Gupta
2018-03-15 16:38           ` Vineet Gupta
2018-03-15 17:21           ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-03-15 17:21             ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-03-16  7:20             ` Adrian Hunter
2018-03-16  7:20               ` Adrian Hunter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1520942674.10285.8.camel@synopsys.com \
    --to=evgeniy.didin@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.