From: "Kani, Toshi" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "cpandya@codeaurora.org" <cpandya@codeaurora.org>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"takahiro.akashi@linaro.org" <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
"james.morse@arm.com" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"kristina.martsenko@arm.com" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"marc.zyngier@arm.com" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: Implement page table free interfaces
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:29:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521487759.2693.224.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1521463256-19858-3-git-send-email-cpandya@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 18:10 +0530, Chintan Pandya wrote:
> Implement pud_free_pmd_page() and pmd_free_pte_page().
>
> Implementation requires,
> 1) Freeing of the un-used next level page tables
> 2) Clearing off the current pud/pmd entry
> 3) Invalidate TLB which could have previously
> valid but not stale entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Chintan Pandya <cpandya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index da98828..c70f139 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> #include <asm/memblock.h>
> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> #include <asm/ptdump.h>
> +#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>
> #define NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(0)
> #define NO_CONT_MAPPINGS BIT(1)
> @@ -975,10 +976,35 @@ int pmd_clear_huge(pmd_t *pmdp)
>
> int pud_free_pmd_page(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr)
> {
> - return pud_none(*pud);
> + pmd_t *pmd;
> + int i;
> +
> + pmd = __va(pud_val(*pud));
> + if (pud_val(*pud)) {
> + for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PMD; i++)
> + pmd_free_pte_page(&pmd[i], addr + (i * PMD_SIZE));
> +
> + free_page((unsigned long) pmd);
Why do you want to free this pmd page before clearing the pud entry on
this arm64 version (as it seems you intentionally changed it from the
x86 version)? It can be reused while being pointed by the pud. Same
for pmd.
> + pud_clear(pud);
> + flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, addr + PUD_SIZE);
Since you purge the entire pud range here, do you still need to call
pmd_free_pte_page() to purge each pmd range? This looks very expensive.
You may want to consider if calling internal __pmd_free_pte_page()
without the purge operation works.
-Toshi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: toshi.kani@hpe.com (Kani, Toshi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: Implement page table free interfaces
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:29:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521487759.2693.224.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1521463256-19858-3-git-send-email-cpandya@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 18:10 +0530, Chintan Pandya wrote:
> Implement pud_free_pmd_page() and pmd_free_pte_page().
>
> Implementation requires,
> 1) Freeing of the un-used next level page tables
> 2) Clearing off the current pud/pmd entry
> 3) Invalidate TLB which could have previously
> valid but not stale entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Chintan Pandya <cpandya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index da98828..c70f139 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> #include <asm/memblock.h>
> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> #include <asm/ptdump.h>
> +#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>
> #define NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(0)
> #define NO_CONT_MAPPINGS BIT(1)
> @@ -975,10 +976,35 @@ int pmd_clear_huge(pmd_t *pmdp)
>
> int pud_free_pmd_page(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr)
> {
> - return pud_none(*pud);
> + pmd_t *pmd;
> + int i;
> +
> + pmd = __va(pud_val(*pud));
> + if (pud_val(*pud)) {
> + for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PMD; i++)
> + pmd_free_pte_page(&pmd[i], addr + (i * PMD_SIZE));
> +
> + free_page((unsigned long) pmd);
Why do you want to free this pmd page before clearing the pud entry on
this arm64 version (as it seems you intentionally changed it from the
x86 version)? It can be reused while being pointed by the pud. Same
for pmd.
> + pud_clear(pud);
> + flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, addr + PUD_SIZE);
Since you purge the entire pud range here, do you still need to call
pmd_free_pte_page() to purge each pmd range? This looks very expensive.
You may want to consider if calling internal __pmd_free_pte_page()
without the purge operation works.
-Toshi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-19 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-19 12:40 [PATCH v3 0/3] Fix issues with huge mapping in ioremap for ARM64 Chintan Pandya
2018-03-19 12:40 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-03-19 12:40 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-03-19 12:40 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-03-19 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ioremap: Update pgtable free interfaces with addr Chintan Pandya
2018-03-19 12:40 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-03-19 19:01 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-03-19 19:01 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-03-19 19:01 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-03-20 7:04 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-03-20 7:04 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-03-19 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: Implement page table free interfaces Chintan Pandya
2018-03-19 12:40 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-03-19 19:29 ` Kani, Toshi [this message]
2018-03-19 19:29 ` Kani, Toshi
2018-03-20 7:06 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-03-20 7:06 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-03-19 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] Revert "arm64: Enforce BBM for huge IO/VMAP mappings" Chintan Pandya
2018-03-19 12:40 ` Chintan Pandya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1521487759.2693.224.camel@hpe.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cpandya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.