From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 2/2] ixgbevf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:42:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521733352-25266-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1521733352-25266-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
Code includes wmb() followed by writel() in multiple places. writel()
already has a barrier on some architectures like arm64.
This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.
Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
index 815cb1a..eaa930e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ static void ixgbevf_alloc_rx_buffers(struct ixgbevf_ring *rx_ring,
* such as IA-64).
*/
wmb();
- writel(i, rx_ring->tail);
+ writel_relaxed(i, rx_ring->tail);
}
}
@@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ static int ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector *q_vector,
* know there are new descriptors to fetch.
*/
wmb();
- writel(xdp_ring->next_to_use, xdp_ring->tail);
+ writel_relaxed(xdp_ring->next_to_use, xdp_ring->tail);
}
u64_stats_update_begin(&rx_ring->syncp);
@@ -4004,7 +4004,7 @@ static void ixgbevf_tx_map(struct ixgbevf_ring *tx_ring,
tx_ring->next_to_use = i;
/* notify HW of packet */
- writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
+ writel_relaxed(i, tx_ring->tail);
return;
dma_error:
--
2.7.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org,
sulrich@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] ixgbevf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:42:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521733352-25266-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1521733352-25266-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
Code includes wmb() followed by writel() in multiple places. writel()
already has a barrier on some architectures like arm64.
This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.
Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
index 815cb1a..eaa930e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ static void ixgbevf_alloc_rx_buffers(struct ixgbevf_ring *rx_ring,
* such as IA-64).
*/
wmb();
- writel(i, rx_ring->tail);
+ writel_relaxed(i, rx_ring->tail);
}
}
@@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ static int ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector *q_vector,
* know there are new descriptors to fetch.
*/
wmb();
- writel(xdp_ring->next_to_use, xdp_ring->tail);
+ writel_relaxed(xdp_ring->next_to_use, xdp_ring->tail);
}
u64_stats_update_begin(&rx_ring->syncp);
@@ -4004,7 +4004,7 @@ static void ixgbevf_tx_map(struct ixgbevf_ring *tx_ring,
tx_ring->next_to_use = i;
/* notify HW of packet */
- writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
+ writel_relaxed(i, tx_ring->tail);
return;
dma_error:
--
2.7.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] ixgbevf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:42:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521733352-25266-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1521733352-25266-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
Code includes wmb() followed by writel() in multiple places. writel()
already has a barrier on some architectures like arm64.
This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.
Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
index 815cb1a..eaa930e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ static void ixgbevf_alloc_rx_buffers(struct ixgbevf_ring *rx_ring,
* such as IA-64).
*/
wmb();
- writel(i, rx_ring->tail);
+ writel_relaxed(i, rx_ring->tail);
}
}
@@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ static int ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector *q_vector,
* know there are new descriptors to fetch.
*/
wmb();
- writel(xdp_ring->next_to_use, xdp_ring->tail);
+ writel_relaxed(xdp_ring->next_to_use, xdp_ring->tail);
}
u64_stats_update_begin(&rx_ring->syncp);
@@ -4004,7 +4004,7 @@ static void ixgbevf_tx_map(struct ixgbevf_ring *tx_ring,
tx_ring->next_to_use = i;
/* notify HW of packet */
- writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
+ writel_relaxed(i, tx_ring->tail);
return;
dma_error:
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-22 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-22 15:42 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 1/2] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb() Sinan Kaya
2018-03-22 15:42 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-22 15:42 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-22 15:42 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2018-03-22 15:42 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] ixgbevf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs Sinan Kaya
2018-03-22 15:42 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-23 18:57 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Bowers, AndrewX
2018-03-23 18:56 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 1/2] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb() Bowers, AndrewX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1521733352-25266-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.