All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	Doug Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	Wenrui Li <wenrui.li-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: bindings: add dt documentation for Rockchip PCIe PHY
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 22:40:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524911.R4OXTTYFIK@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160608202900.GA25662@rob-hp-laptop>

Am Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2016, 15:29:00 schrieb Rob Herring:
> gOn Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:25:08PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> > This patch adds a binding that describes the Rockchip PCIe PHY
> > found on Rockchip SoCs PCIe interface.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-pcie-phy.txt  | 22
> >  ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-pcie-phy.txt> 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-pcie-phy.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-pcie-phy.txt new file
> > mode 100644
> > index 0000000..ba8c406
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-pcie-phy.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> > +Rockchip PCIE PHY
> > +-----------------------
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > + - compatible: rockchip,rk3399-pcie-phy
> > + - #phy-cells: must be 0
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > +grf: syscon@ff770000 {
> > +	compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-grf", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
> > +	#address-cells = <1>;
> > +	#size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > +	...
> > +
> > +	pcie_phy: phy@e220 {
> 
> unit-address needs a reg property or drop the unit address. I'd do the
> former if there's a register range you can describe here.

Hmm, I think I'd suggest going the other way - call the node pcie-phy .

While the General Register Files do contain some specific address ranges (like 
for the emmc phy, or some performance monitor things), the register at 0xe220 
is a shared register (GRF_SOC_CON8), containing both i2s and pcie setting 
bits.

Specifying register ranges suggests some form of exclusivity to me - which is 
just great for things like the emmc phy that has an actual range, but for a 
device being controlled from some shared register.


Heiko

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Wenrui Li <wenrui.li@rock-chips.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: bindings: add dt documentation for Rockchip PCIe PHY
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 22:40:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524911.R4OXTTYFIK@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160608202900.GA25662@rob-hp-laptop>

Am Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2016, 15:29:00 schrieb Rob Herring:
> gOn Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:25:08PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> > This patch adds a binding that describes the Rockchip PCIe PHY
> > found on Rockchip SoCs PCIe interface.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-pcie-phy.txt  | 22
> >  ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-pcie-phy.txt> 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-pcie-phy.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-pcie-phy.txt new file
> > mode 100644
> > index 0000000..ba8c406
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-pcie-phy.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> > +Rockchip PCIE PHY
> > +-----------------------
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > + - compatible: rockchip,rk3399-pcie-phy
> > + - #phy-cells: must be 0
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > +grf: syscon@ff770000 {
> > +	compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-grf", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
> > +	#address-cells = <1>;
> > +	#size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > +	...
> > +
> > +	pcie_phy: phy@e220 {
> 
> unit-address needs a reg property or drop the unit address. I'd do the
> former if there's a register range you can describe here.

Hmm, I think I'd suggest going the other way - call the node pcie-phy .

While the General Register Files do contain some specific address ranges (like 
for the emmc phy, or some performance monitor things), the register at 0xe220 
is a shared register (GRF_SOC_CON8), containing both i2s and pcie setting 
bits.

Specifying register ranges suggests some form of exclusivity to me - which is 
just great for things like the emmc phy that has an actual range, but for a 
device being controlled from some shared register.


Heiko

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-08 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-08  7:25 [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: bindings: add dt documentation for Rockchip PCIe PHY Shawn Lin
2016-06-08  7:25 ` Shawn Lin
     [not found] ` <1465370708-23619-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-08 20:29   ` Rob Herring
2016-06-08 20:29     ` Rob Herring
2016-06-08 20:40     ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2016-06-08 20:40       ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-12  7:38       ` Shawn Lin
2016-06-10  4:01   ` Doug Anderson
2016-06-10  4:01     ` Doug Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1524911.R4OXTTYFIK@diego \
    --to=heiko-4mtyjxux2i+zqb+pc5nmwq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kishon-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wenrui.li-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.