Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] Bluetooth: hci_mediatek: Add protocol support for MediaTek serial devices

[Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>]

Hi, Marcel

On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 09:27 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Sean,
> 
> >>> +
> >>> +static int mtk_wmt_cmd_sync(struct hci_uart *hu, u8 opcode, u8 flag, u16 plen,
> >>> +			    const void *param)
> >>> +{
> >>> +	struct mtk_bt_dev *btdev = hu->priv;
> >>> +	struct hci_command_hdr *hhdr;
> >>> +	struct hci_acl_hdr *ahdr;
> >>> +	struct mtk_wmt_hdr *whdr;
> >>> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> >>> +	int ret = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> +	init_completion(&btdev->wmt_cmd);
> >>> +
> >>> +	skb = bt_skb_alloc(plen + MTK_WMT_CMD_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> +	if (!skb)
> >>> +		return -ENOMEM;
> >>> +
> >>> +	/*
> >>> +	 * WMT data is carried in either ACL or HCI format with op code as
> >>> +	 * 0xfc6f and followed by a WMT header and its actual payload.
> >>> +	 */
> >> 
> >> Please use net subsystem comment style.
> >> 
> >>> +	switch (opcode) {
> >>> +	case MTK_WMT_PATCH_DWNLD:
> >>> +		ahdr = skb_put(skb, HCI_ACL_HDR_SIZE);
> >>> +		ahdr->handle = cpu_to_le16(0xfc6f);
> >>> +		ahdr->dlen   = cpu_to_le16(plen + MTK_WMT_HDR_SIZE);
> >>> +		break;
> >>> +	default:
> >>> +		hhdr = skb_put(skb, HCI_COMMAND_HDR_SIZE);
> >>> +		hhdr->opcode = cpu_to_le16(0xfc6f);
> >>> +		hhdr->plen = plen + MTK_WMT_HDR_SIZE;
> >>> +		break;
> >>> +	}
> >>> +
> >>> +	hci_skb_pkt_type(skb) = opcode == MTK_WMT_PATCH_DWNLD ?
> >>> +				HCI_ACLDATA_PKT : HCI_COMMAND_PKT;
> >> 
> >> Why not move that into the switch statement above.
> >> 
> >>> +
> >>> +	/* Start to build a WMT header and its actual payload. */
> >>> +	whdr = skb_put(skb, MTK_WMT_HDR_SIZE);
> >>> +	whdr->dir = 1;
> >>> +	whdr->op = opcode;
> >>> +	whdr->dlen = cpu_to_le16(plen + 1);
> >>> +	whdr->flag = flag;
> >>> +	skb_put_data(skb, param, plen);
> >>> +
> >>> +	mtk_enqueue(hu, skb);
> >>> +	hci_uart_tx_wakeup(hu);
> >>> +
> >>> +	/*
> >>> +	 * Waiting a WMT event response, while we must take care in case of
> >>> +	 * failures for the wait.
> >>> +	 */
> >>> +	ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&btdev->wmt_cmd, HZ);
> >>> +
> >>> +	return ret > 0 ? 0 : ret < 0 ? ret : -ETIMEDOUT;
> >>> +}
> >> 
> >> All in all I am not convinced that this is super clean. I get that we need something special for having this in the ACL data packets, but for the standard HCI command I prefer that __hci_cmd_sync is used. I addition, it seems that patch download is the only special case and that happens before at the setup stage. So we could make things special for that. I need to understand this a bit better. Can I get a btmon -w trace.log file from the whole init procedure.
> >> 
> > 
> > While i was trying to rewrite the driver based on btuart.c. you posted
> > on RFC, I used __hci_cmd_sync_ev to replace such kinds of SoC specific
> > hci command sending which I've done previously with mtk_wmt_cmd_sync.
> > 
> > However, eventually, I got a cmd_timer timeout whose message printed
> > on console as "Bluetooth: hci0: command 0xfc6f tx timeout".
> > 
> > The mtk soc specific cmd/event I posted below, I dumped directly in
> > driver, always uses cmd as opcode 0xfc6f, and its event id as 0xe4.
> > 
> > It appears to the event id is not standard and thus it cannot cancel the
> > cmd timer when the special hci event is being handled. This way can we
> > can still use __hci_cmd_sync api ?
> > 
> > [    4.896200] hci tx: 00000000: 01 6f fc 05 01 07 01 00 04    
> > [    4.904671] hci rx: 00000000: e4 05 02 07 01 00
> > 00                             
> > [    4.912859] Bluetooth: hci0 event 0xe4
> > 
> > 
> > buildroot login: [    6.914509] Bluetooth: hci0: command 0xfc6f tx
> > timeout
> > [    6.919831] hci tx: 00000000: 01 6f fc 06 01 06 02 00 00
> > 01                    .o........
> > [    7.006631] hci rx: 00000000: e4 05 02 06 01 00
> > 00                             .......
> > [    7.014821] Bluetooth: hci0 event 0xe4
> 
> can you just start btmon before loading the module / driver? It makes it a lot easier since it will actually decode the basics for us. If there is a bug within __hci_cmd_sync_ev, then we are going to fix it.
> 

I'm happy to do with btmon. just the environment with buildroot the BT
running on seems there's a missing support for btmon. I can start to use
btmon once I change the environment to Debian.

> So all the MTK vendor commands respond with a vendor event? Or are there some that do the standard command status/complete handling?
> 

yes, mtk controller after mt7622 (included), its MTK vendors command
(opcode 0xfc6f) always respond with a vendor event id 0xe4. And they
don't do any standard status/complete handling.

BTW, mtk controller before mt7622, such as mt7623, its MTK vendor
command always go with completely specific format, not with hci format.

> Regards
> 
> Marcel
>