From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com>,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: dt: Set default policy->transition_delay_ns
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 02:15:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1537403.PHBCuCX8Fr@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170522112727.GI6510@vireshk-i7>
On Monday, May 22, 2017 04:57:27 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22-05-17, 19:17, Leo Yan wrote:
> > This afternoon Amit pointed me for this patch, should fix as below?
> > Otherwise it seems directly assign the same value from unit 'ns' to
> > 'us' but without any value conversion.
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > index 76877a6..dcc90fc 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > unsigned int lat;
> >
> > tunables->rate_limit_us = LATENCY_MULTIPLIER;
> > - lat = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / NSEC_PER_USEC;
> > + lat = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / NSEC_PER_MSEC;
> > if (lat)
> > tunables->rate_limit_us *= lat;
> > }
>
> I will let Rafael comment in as well. NSEC_PER_USEC is used in the
> earlier governors as well (ondemand/conservative) in exactly the same
> way as schedutil is using.
The reason why it is used by schedutil is because the other governors used it
that way. IOW, doesn't matter. :-)
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-27 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-22 5:10 [PATCH] cpufreq: dt: Set default policy->transition_delay_ns Viresh Kumar
2017-05-22 10:45 ` Brendan Jackman
2017-05-22 10:55 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-05-22 11:17 ` Leo Yan
2017-05-22 11:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-27 0:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2017-06-27 4:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-27 16:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-28 4:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-28 20:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1537403.PHBCuCX8Fr@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
--cc=brendan.jackman@arm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.