All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: dt: Set default policy->transition_delay_ns
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:50:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170627042041.GA29665@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1537403.PHBCuCX8Fr@aspire.rjw.lan>

On 27-06-17, 02:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, May 22, 2017 04:57:27 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 22-05-17, 19:17, Leo Yan wrote:
> > > This afternoon Amit pointed me for this patch, should fix as below?
> > > Otherwise it seems directly assign the same value from unit 'ns' to
> > > 'us' but without any value conversion.
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > > index 76877a6..dcc90fc 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > > @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > >                 unsigned int lat;
> > >  
> > >                 tunables->rate_limit_us = LATENCY_MULTIPLIER;
> > > -               lat = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / NSEC_PER_USEC;

I think the above line is just fine and the below one is incorrect, as
we wanted to convert transition latency to usec here (i.e. in the
units of rate_limit_us).

> > > +               lat = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / NSEC_PER_MSEC;
> > >                 if (lat)
> > >                         tunables->rate_limit_us *= lat;
> > >         }
> > 
> > I will let Rafael comment in as well. NSEC_PER_USEC is used in the
> > earlier governors as well (ondemand/conservative) in exactly the same
> > way as schedutil is using.
> 
> The reason why it is used by schedutil is because the other governors used it
> that way.  IOW, doesn't matter. :-)

But I feel the value of LATENCY_MULTIPLIER (1000) is way too high. It currently
says that if freq-switching takes time X, then we should wait for 999X time
before we change the freq again.

Perhaps LATENCY_MULTIPLIER should be just 10 or 20 here. For a platform with
transition_latency 500 us, rate_limit_us comes to 500 ms. Which is absurd. We
ideally want it to be around 10-20 ms here. And compared to other ARM platforms,
500 us transition_latency is very low. It normally is around 1-3 ms for ARM32
platforms.

@Rafael: Will it be fine to lower down the value of LATENCY_MULTIPLIER?

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-27  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-22  5:10 [PATCH] cpufreq: dt: Set default policy->transition_delay_ns Viresh Kumar
2017-05-22 10:45 ` Brendan Jackman
2017-05-22 10:55   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-05-22 11:17     ` Leo Yan
2017-05-22 11:27       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-27  0:15         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-27  4:20           ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2017-06-27 16:08             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-28  4:14               ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-28 20:52                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170627042041.GA29665@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
    --cc=brendan.jackman@arm.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.