All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: len.brown@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	jiangshanlai@gmail.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, pavel@ucw.cz,
	zwisler@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [driver-core PATCH v5 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific NUMA node
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 16:50:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1541551829.196084.206.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154145230954.29224.13087735653265580553.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com>

On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 13:11 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> +/**
> + * async_schedule_domain - schedule a function for asynchronous execution within a certain domain
> + * @func: function to execute asynchronously
> + * @data: data pointer to pass to the function
> + * @domain: the domain
> + *
> + * Returns an async_cookie_t that may be used for checkpointing later.
> + * @domain may be used in the async_synchronize_*_domain() functions to
> + * wait within a certain synchronization domain rather than globally.  A
> + * synchronization domain is specified via @domain.
> + * Note: This function may be called from atomic or non-atomic contexts.
> + */

Please leave out "A synchronization domain is specified via @domain." since
that text is redundant due to "@domain: the domain".

> +/**
> + * async_schedule_dev_domain - A device specific version of async_schedule_domain
> + * @func: function to execute asynchronously
> + * @dev: device argument to be passed to function
> + * @domain: the domain
> + *
> + * Returns an async_cookie_t that may be used for checkpointing later.
> + * @dev is used as both the argument for the function and to provide NUMA
> + * context for where to run the function. By doing this we can try to
> + * provide for the best possible outcome by operating on the device on the
> + * CPUs closest to the device.
> + * @domain may be used in the async_synchronize_*_domain() functions to
> + * wait within a certain synchronization domain rather than globally.  A
> + * synchronization domain is specified via @domain.
> + * Note: This function may be called from atomic or non-atomic contexts.
> + */

Same comment here: I think "A synchronization domain is specified via @domain."
is redundant.

> +/**
> + * async_schedule_node_domain - NUMA specific version of async_schedule_domain
> + * @func: function to execute asynchronously
> + * @data: data pointer to pass to the function
> + * @node: NUMA node that we want to schedule this on or close to
> + * @domain: the domain
> + *
> + * Returns an async_cookie_t that may be used for checkpointing later.
> + * @domain may be used in the async_synchronize_*_domain() functions to
> + * wait within a certain synchronization domain rather than globally.  A
> + * synchronization domain is specified via @domain.  Note: This function
> + * may be called from atomic or non-atomic contexts.
> + *
> + * The node requested will be honored on a best effort basis. If the node
> + * has no CPUs associated with it then the work is distributed among all
> + * available CPUs.
> + */

Same comment here: I think that also in the above "A synchronization domain is
specified via @domain." is redundant.

Otherwise this patch looks fine to me.

Bart.

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
To: Alexander Duyck
	<alexander.h.duyck-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Cc: len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	rafael-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	jiangshanlai-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org,
	zwisler-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [driver-core PATCH v5 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific NUMA node
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 16:50:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1541551829.196084.206.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154145230954.29224.13087735653265580553.stgit-+uVpp3jiz/RcxmDmkzA3yGt3HXsI98Cx0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>

On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 13:11 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> +/**
> + * async_schedule_domain - schedule a function for asynchronous execution within a certain domain
> + * @func: function to execute asynchronously
> + * @data: data pointer to pass to the function
> + * @domain: the domain
> + *
> + * Returns an async_cookie_t that may be used for checkpointing later.
> + * @domain may be used in the async_synchronize_*_domain() functions to
> + * wait within a certain synchronization domain rather than globally.  A
> + * synchronization domain is specified via @domain.
> + * Note: This function may be called from atomic or non-atomic contexts.
> + */

Please leave out "A synchronization domain is specified via @domain." since
that text is redundant due to "@domain: the domain".

> +/**
> + * async_schedule_dev_domain - A device specific version of async_schedule_domain
> + * @func: function to execute asynchronously
> + * @dev: device argument to be passed to function
> + * @domain: the domain
> + *
> + * Returns an async_cookie_t that may be used for checkpointing later.
> + * @dev is used as both the argument for the function and to provide NUMA
> + * context for where to run the function. By doing this we can try to
> + * provide for the best possible outcome by operating on the device on the
> + * CPUs closest to the device.
> + * @domain may be used in the async_synchronize_*_domain() functions to
> + * wait within a certain synchronization domain rather than globally.  A
> + * synchronization domain is specified via @domain.
> + * Note: This function may be called from atomic or non-atomic contexts.
> + */

Same comment here: I think "A synchronization domain is specified via @domain."
is redundant.

> +/**
> + * async_schedule_node_domain - NUMA specific version of async_schedule_domain
> + * @func: function to execute asynchronously
> + * @data: data pointer to pass to the function
> + * @node: NUMA node that we want to schedule this on or close to
> + * @domain: the domain
> + *
> + * Returns an async_cookie_t that may be used for checkpointing later.
> + * @domain may be used in the async_synchronize_*_domain() functions to
> + * wait within a certain synchronization domain rather than globally.  A
> + * synchronization domain is specified via @domain.  Note: This function
> + * may be called from atomic or non-atomic contexts.
> + *
> + * The node requested will be honored on a best effort basis. If the node
> + * has no CPUs associated with it then the work is distributed among all
> + * available CPUs.
> + */

Same comment here: I think that also in the above "A synchronization domain is
specified via @domain." is redundant.

Otherwise this patch looks fine to me.

Bart.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, tj@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	jiangshanlai@gmail.com, rafael@kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com,
	pavel@ucw.cz, zwisler@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	dave.jiang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [driver-core PATCH v5 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific NUMA node
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 16:50:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1541551829.196084.206.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154145230954.29224.13087735653265580553.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com>

On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 13:11 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> +/**
> + * async_schedule_domain - schedule a function for asynchronous execution within a certain domain
> + * @func: function to execute asynchronously
> + * @data: data pointer to pass to the function
> + * @domain: the domain
> + *
> + * Returns an async_cookie_t that may be used for checkpointing later.
> + * @domain may be used in the async_synchronize_*_domain() functions to
> + * wait within a certain synchronization domain rather than globally.  A
> + * synchronization domain is specified via @domain.
> + * Note: This function may be called from atomic or non-atomic contexts.
> + */

Please leave out "A synchronization domain is specified via @domain." since
that text is redundant due to "@domain: the domain".

> +/**
> + * async_schedule_dev_domain - A device specific version of async_schedule_domain
> + * @func: function to execute asynchronously
> + * @dev: device argument to be passed to function
> + * @domain: the domain
> + *
> + * Returns an async_cookie_t that may be used for checkpointing later.
> + * @dev is used as both the argument for the function and to provide NUMA
> + * context for where to run the function. By doing this we can try to
> + * provide for the best possible outcome by operating on the device on the
> + * CPUs closest to the device.
> + * @domain may be used in the async_synchronize_*_domain() functions to
> + * wait within a certain synchronization domain rather than globally.  A
> + * synchronization domain is specified via @domain.
> + * Note: This function may be called from atomic or non-atomic contexts.
> + */

Same comment here: I think "A synchronization domain is specified via @domain."
is redundant.

> +/**
> + * async_schedule_node_domain - NUMA specific version of async_schedule_domain
> + * @func: function to execute asynchronously
> + * @data: data pointer to pass to the function
> + * @node: NUMA node that we want to schedule this on or close to
> + * @domain: the domain
> + *
> + * Returns an async_cookie_t that may be used for checkpointing later.
> + * @domain may be used in the async_synchronize_*_domain() functions to
> + * wait within a certain synchronization domain rather than globally.  A
> + * synchronization domain is specified via @domain.  Note: This function
> + * may be called from atomic or non-atomic contexts.
> + *
> + * The node requested will be honored on a best effort basis. If the node
> + * has no CPUs associated with it then the work is distributed among all
> + * available CPUs.
> + */

Same comment here: I think that also in the above "A synchronization domain is
specified via @domain." is redundant.

Otherwise this patch looks fine to me.

Bart.


  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-07  0:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-05 21:11 [driver-core PATCH v5 0/9] Add NUMA aware async_schedule calls Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:11 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:11 ` [driver-core PATCH v5 1/9] workqueue: Provide queue_work_node to queue work near a given NUMA node Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:11   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:11   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-06  0:42   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06  0:42     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06  0:42     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06 16:27     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-06 16:27       ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-06 16:27       ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:11 ` [driver-core PATCH v5 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific " Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:11   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:11   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-07  0:50   ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-11-07  0:50     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-07  0:50     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-05 21:11 ` [driver-core PATCH v5 3/9] device core: Consolidate locking and unlocking of parent and device Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:11   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:11   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:11 ` [driver-core PATCH v5 4/9] driver core: Move async_synchronize_full call Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:11   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-06  1:04   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06  1:04     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06  1:04     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06 16:18     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-06 16:18       ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-06 16:18       ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-06 17:22       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06 17:22         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06 17:22         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-05 21:12 ` [driver-core PATCH v5 5/9] driver core: Establish clear order of operations for deferred probe and remove Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:12   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:12   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-06  4:10   ` kbuild test robot
2018-11-06  4:10     ` kbuild test robot
2018-11-06  4:10     ` kbuild test robot
2018-11-06 23:51     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06 23:51       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06 23:51       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-07  0:52       ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-07  0:52         ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-23  1:23       ` Rong Chen
2018-11-23  1:23         ` Rong Chen
2018-11-23  1:23         ` Rong Chen
2018-11-23 14:19         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-23 14:19           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06 23:48   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06 23:48     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06 23:48     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-07  1:34     ` Joe Perches
2018-11-07  1:34       ` Joe Perches
2018-11-07  1:34       ` Joe Perches
2018-11-08 23:42       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:42         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:42         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-11 14:31     ` Pavel Machek
2018-11-27  2:35   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  2:35     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 16:49     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 16:49       ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:12 ` [driver-core PATCH v5 6/9] driver core: Probe devices asynchronously instead of the driver Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:12   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:12   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-07  0:22   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-07  0:22     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-07  0:22     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-05 21:12 ` [driver-core PATCH v5 7/9] driver core: Attach devices on CPU local to device node Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:12   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:12   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-07  0:24   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-07  0:24     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-07  0:24     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-05 21:12 ` [driver-core PATCH v5 8/9] PM core: Use new async_schedule_dev command Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:12   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:12   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-07  0:24   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-07  0:24     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-07  0:24     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-05 21:12 ` [driver-core PATCH v5 9/9] libnvdimm: Schedule device registration on node local to the device Alexander Duyck
2018-11-05 21:12   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-07  0:26   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-07  0:26     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-07  0:26     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06  0:50 ` [driver-core PATCH v5 0/9] Add NUMA aware async_schedule calls Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06  0:50   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06  0:50   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-06 16:25   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-06 16:25     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-06 16:25     ` Alexander Duyck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1541551829.196084.206.camel@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.