* Yocto layers missing thud branches
@ 2018-11-17 23:50 akuster808
2018-11-17 23:53 ` Nicolas Dechesne
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: akuster808 @ 2018-11-17 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl
please add a "Thud" branch
kind regards,
Armin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: Yocto layers missing thud branches 2018-11-17 23:50 Yocto layers missing thud branches akuster808 @ 2018-11-17 23:53 ` Nicolas Dechesne 2018-11-18 11:11 ` Max Krummenacher ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Nicolas Dechesne @ 2018-11-17 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: akuster808; +Cc: Yocto list discussion [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 728 bytes --] hi, while we are there.. in our builds we use the following layers which also need the 'thud' branches: name="OSSystems/meta-browser" path="layers/meta-browser" name="git/meta-ti" path="layers/meta-ti" remote="yocto" name="kraj/meta-clang" path="layers/meta-clang" name="meta-rust/meta-rust" path="layers/meta-rust" thanks! nico On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 12:50 AM akuster808 <akuster808@gmail.com> wrote: > Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl > please add a "Thud" branch > > kind regards, > Armin > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1391 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto layers missing thud branches 2018-11-17 23:50 Yocto layers missing thud branches akuster808 2018-11-17 23:53 ` Nicolas Dechesne @ 2018-11-18 11:11 ` Max Krummenacher 2018-11-18 20:47 ` Paul Eggleton 2018-11-22 15:10 ` Matthias Schoepfer 2018-11-22 16:42 ` Stephen Lawrence 3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Max Krummenacher @ 2018-11-18 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: akuster808, yocto@yoctoproject.org Hi Am Samstag, den 17.11.2018, 15:50 -0800 schrieb akuster808: > Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl > please add a "Thud" branch > While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are not yet applied: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html Thanks. Max ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto layers missing thud branches 2018-11-18 11:11 ` Max Krummenacher @ 2018-11-18 20:47 ` Paul Eggleton 2018-11-18 21:11 ` akuster808 2018-11-20 23:05 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Paul Eggleton @ 2018-11-18 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto On Monday, 19 November 2018 12:11:35 AM NZDT Max Krummenacher wrote: > Am Samstag, den 17.11.2018, 15:50 -0800 schrieb akuster808: > > Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl > > please add a "Thud" branch > > > While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are not > yet applied: > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto layers missing thud branches 2018-11-18 20:47 ` Paul Eggleton @ 2018-11-18 21:11 ` akuster808 2018-11-20 23:05 ` Richard Purdie 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: akuster808 @ 2018-11-18 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Eggleton, yocto On 11/18/18 12:47 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Monday, 19 November 2018 12:11:35 AM NZDT Max Krummenacher wrote: >> Am Samstag, den 17.11.2018, 15:50 -0800 schrieb akuster808: >>> Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl >>> please add a "Thud" branch >>> >> While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are not >> yet applied: >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html > I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW. Thanks Paul. > > Cheers, > Paul > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto layers missing thud branches 2018-11-18 20:47 ` Paul Eggleton 2018-11-18 21:11 ` akuster808 @ 2018-11-20 23:05 ` Richard Purdie 2018-11-20 23:21 ` akuster808 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2018-11-20 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Eggleton, yocto On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 09:47 +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Monday, 19 November 2018 12:11:35 AM NZDT Max Krummenacher wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 17.11.2018, 15:50 -0800 schrieb akuster808: > > > Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and > > > meta-cgl > > > please add a "Thud" branch > > > > > > > While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are > > not > > yet applied: > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html > > I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW. Given we don't test those any more, should we be pushing these new branches? Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto layers missing thud branches 2018-11-20 23:05 ` Richard Purdie @ 2018-11-20 23:21 ` akuster808 2018-11-20 23:55 ` richard.purdie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: akuster808 @ 2018-11-20 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Purdie, Paul Eggleton, yocto On 11/20/18 4:05 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 09:47 +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> On Monday, 19 November 2018 12:11:35 AM NZDT Max Krummenacher wrote: >>> Am Samstag, den 17.11.2018, 15:50 -0800 schrieb akuster808: >>>> Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and >>>> meta-cgl >>>> please add a "Thud" branch >>>> >>> While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are >>> not >>> yet applied: >>> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html >> I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW. > Given we don't test those any more, should we be pushing these new > branches? Are the branching schemes in sync with what we test , build or both? I think we should be clear what is built or built and tested if there are exception. The 2.6 release notes called out so it may lead to the conclusion its tested. Release Name: meta-qt3-thud-20.0.0 Branch: thud Tag: thud-20.0.0 Hash: 02f273cba6c25f5cf20cb66d8a417a83772c3179 md5: 7b73bf1132428ea898938b03815cad21 - armin > > Cheers, > > Richard > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto layers missing thud branches 2018-11-20 23:21 ` akuster808 @ 2018-11-20 23:55 ` richard.purdie 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: richard.purdie @ 2018-11-20 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: akuster808, Paul Eggleton, yocto On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 16:21 -0700, akuster808 wrote: > > On 11/20/18 4:05 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 09:47 +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > On Monday, 19 November 2018 12:11:35 AM NZDT Max Krummenacher wrote: > > > > Am Samstag, den 17.11.2018, 15:50 -0800 schrieb akuster808: > > > > > Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and > > > > > meta-cgl > > > > > please add a "Thud" branch > > > > > > > > > > > > > While at it, the following patches declaring thud compatibility are > > > > not > > > > yet applied: > > > > > > > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042780.html > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042922.html > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-October/042923.html > > > I have just taken care of meta-qt3 and meta-qt4, FWIW. > > > > Given we don't test those any more, should we be pushing these new > > branches? > > Are the branching schemes in sync with what we test , build or both? > I think we should be clear what is built or built and tested if there > are exception. > > > The 2.6 release notes called out so it may lead to the conclusion its > tested. > > Release Name: meta-qt3-thud-20.0.0 > Branch: thud > Tag: thud-20.0.0 > Hash: 02f273cba6c25f5cf20cb66d8a417a83772c3179 > md5: 7b73bf1132428ea898938b03815cad21 Scripts may have put that in the release notes and even done tagging but I'm fairly sure it doesn't get built or tested... I think processes are being followed without review. Yes, I probably should have caught this before now but I'm not alone in that :(. Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto layers missing thud branches 2018-11-17 23:50 Yocto layers missing thud branches akuster808 2018-11-17 23:53 ` Nicolas Dechesne 2018-11-18 11:11 ` Max Krummenacher @ 2018-11-22 15:10 ` Matthias Schoepfer 2018-11-22 16:42 ` Stephen Lawrence 3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Matthias Schoepfer @ 2018-11-22 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 314 bytes --] Hi there, seems like meta-java also missing a thud branch?! git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-java Regards, Matthias On 11/18/2018 12:50 AM, akuster808 wrote: > Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl > please add a "Thud" branch > > kind regards, > Armin [-- Attachment #2: pEpkey.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 1841 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Yocto layers missing thud branches 2018-11-17 23:50 Yocto layers missing thud branches akuster808 ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2018-11-22 15:10 ` Matthias Schoepfer @ 2018-11-22 16:42 ` Stephen Lawrence 3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Stephen Lawrence @ 2018-11-22 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto@yoctoproject.org > -----Original Message----- > From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org <yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org> On Behalf > Of akuster808 > Sent: 17 November 2018 23:50 > To: yocto@yoctoproject.org > Subject: [yocto] Yocto layers missing thud branches > > Can the maintainers of meta-qt3, meta-qt4, meta-selinux, and meta-cgl > please add a "Thud" branch > > kind regards, > Armin Anyone looking for Thud support for the automotive IVI layer meta-ivi [1] can find it on the master branch. That is the working branch ahead of the next major meta-ivi release early next year, which will be based on Thud. [1] https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ivi/ Regards Steve ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-23 8:15 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-11-17 23:50 Yocto layers missing thud branches akuster808 2018-11-17 23:53 ` Nicolas Dechesne 2018-11-18 11:11 ` Max Krummenacher 2018-11-18 20:47 ` Paul Eggleton 2018-11-18 21:11 ` akuster808 2018-11-20 23:05 ` Richard Purdie 2018-11-20 23:21 ` akuster808 2018-11-20 23:55 ` richard.purdie 2018-11-22 15:10 ` Matthias Schoepfer 2018-11-22 16:42 ` Stephen Lawrence
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.