All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: Xiong Zhou <jencce.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:19:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1550969.mvAXU2aY35@c203> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADJHv_uHL0=ebUio3j5ysnaU9gDus+HQi4=pQznTy0B=6+NWAg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Xiong
Sorry for the late reply

On Dienstag, 12. April 2016 21:01:53 CEST Xiong Zhou wrote:
> How about this?
> 
> drivers/scsi/scsi_scan: mark STARGET_REMOVE state before destroy
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhou <jencce.kernel@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> index 27df7e7..21092e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> @@ -395,6 +395,8 @@ static void scsi_target_reap_ref_release(struct kref *kref)
>   transport_remove_device(&starget->dev);
>   device_del(&starget->dev);
>   }
> +
> + starget->state = STARGET_REMOVE;
>   scsi_target_destroy(starget);
>  }

The only scsi_target_reap_ref_release() caller is scsi_target_reap_ref_put(), 
which in turn is only called by scsi_target_reap(). scsi_target_reap()'s only 
callers are scsi_remove_target()/__scsi_remove_target(), which set the 
STARGET_REMOVE state and 

__scsi_add_device()
scsi_get_host_dev()
__scsi_scan_target()

Which I'm currently investiganting (in parallel to reproducing the bug).

> 
> @@ -465,6 +467,7 @@ static struct scsi_target
> *scsi_alloc_target(struct device *parent,
>   dev_printk(KERN_ERR, dev, "target allocation failed, error %d\n", error);
>   /* don't want scsi_target_reap to do the final
>   * put because it will be under the host lock */
> + starget->state = STARGET_REMOVE;
>   scsi_target_destroy(starget);
>   return NULL;
>   }

Here starget->state is STARGET_CREATED and the assertion is already aware of 
this state transitoin. IOTW this /shouldn't/ be needed.


-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                                                                Storage
jthumshirn@suse.de                                                             +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: Xiong Zhou <jencce.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:19:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1550969.mvAXU2aY35@c203> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADJHv_uHL0=ebUio3j5ysnaU9gDus+HQi4=pQznTy0B=6+NWAg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Xiong
Sorry for the late reply

On Dienstag, 12. April 2016 21:01:53 CEST Xiong Zhou wrote:
> How about this?
> 
> drivers/scsi/scsi_scan: mark STARGET_REMOVE state before destroy
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhou <jencce.kernel@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> index 27df7e7..21092e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> @@ -395,6 +395,8 @@ static void scsi_target_reap_ref_release(struct kref *kref)
>   transport_remove_device(&starget->dev);
>   device_del(&starget->dev);
>   }
> +
> + starget->state = STARGET_REMOVE;
>   scsi_target_destroy(starget);
>  }

The only scsi_target_reap_ref_release() caller is scsi_target_reap_ref_put(), 
which in turn is only called by scsi_target_reap(). scsi_target_reap()'s only 
callers are scsi_remove_target()/__scsi_remove_target(), which set the 
STARGET_REMOVE state and 

__scsi_add_device()
scsi_get_host_dev()
__scsi_scan_target()

Which I'm currently investiganting (in parallel to reproducing the bug).

> 
> @@ -465,6 +467,7 @@ static struct scsi_target
> *scsi_alloc_target(struct device *parent,
>   dev_printk(KERN_ERR, dev, "target allocation failed, error %d\n", error);
>   /* don't want scsi_target_reap to do the final
>   * put because it will be under the host lock */
> + starget->state = STARGET_REMOVE;
>   scsi_target_destroy(starget);
>   return NULL;
>   }

Here starget->state is STARGET_CREATED and the assertion is already aware of 
this state transitoin. IOTW this /shouldn't/ be needed.


-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                                                                Storage
jthumshirn@suse.de                                                             +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N�rnberg
GF: Felix Imend�rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N�rnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850


  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-13  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-05  9:50 [PATCH v4 0/2] Update SCSI target removal path Johannes Thumshirn
2016-04-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state Johannes Thumshirn
2016-04-12  5:30   ` Xiong Zhou
2016-04-12 13:01   ` Xiong Zhou
2016-04-13  8:19     ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2016-04-13  8:19       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-04-15  3:24       ` Xiong Zhou
2016-04-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] Revert "scsi: fix soft lockup in scsi_remove_target() on module removal" Johannes Thumshirn
2016-04-05 11:18 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Update SCSI target removal path Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-06  9:06   ` Johannes Thumshirn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1550969.mvAXU2aY35@c203 \
    --to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=emilne@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jencce.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.