From: Michael Yang <michael.yang@imgtec.com>
To: sumit.semwal@linaro.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
gustavo@padovan.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, michael.yang@imgtec.com
Subject: [PATCH] sync_file: Return reasonable timestamp when merging signaled fences
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:01:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1554710495-6646-1-git-send-email-michael.yang@imgtec.com> (raw)
If all the sync points were signaled in both fences a and b,
there was only one sync point in merged fence which is a_fence[0].
The Fence structure in android framework might be confused about
timestamp if there were any sync points which were signaled after
a_fence[0]. It might be more reasonable to use timestamp of last signaled
sync point to represent the merged fence.
The issue can be found from EGL extension ANDROID_get_frame_timestamps.
Sometimes the return value of EGL_READS_DONE_TIME_ANDROID is head of
the return value of EGL_RENDERING_COMPLETE_TIME_ANDROID.
That means display/composition had been completed before rendering
was completed that is incorrect.
Some discussion can be found at:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/907009
Signed-off-by: Michael Yang <michael.yang@imgtec.com>
---
drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
index 4f6305c..d46bfe1 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
@@ -274,8 +274,29 @@ static struct sync_file *sync_file_merge(const char *name, struct sync_file *a,
for (; i_b < b_num_fences; i_b++)
add_fence(fences, &i, b_fences[i_b]);
- if (i == 0)
- fences[i++] = dma_fence_get(a_fences[0]);
+ /* If all the sync pts were signaled, then adding the sync_pt who
+ * was the last signaled to the fence.
+ */
+ if (i == 0) {
+ struct dma_fence *last_signaled_sync_pt = a_fences[0];
+ int iter;
+
+ for (iter = 1; iter < a_num_fences; iter++) {
+ if (ktime_compare(last_signaled_sync_pt->timestamp,
+ a_fences[iter]->timestamp) < 0) {
+ last_signaled_sync_pt = a_fences[iter];
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (iter = 0; iter < b_num_fences; iter++) {
+ if (ktime_compare(last_signaled_sync_pt->timestamp,
+ b_fences[iter]->timestamp) < 0) {
+ last_signaled_sync_pt = b_fences[iter];
+ }
+ }
+
+ fences[i++] = dma_fence_get(last_signaled_sync_pt);
+ }
if (num_fences > i) {
nfences = krealloc(fences, i * sizeof(*fences),
--
2.7.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Yang <michael.yang@imgtec.com>
To: <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<gustavo@padovan.org>, <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
<linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>, <michael.yang@imgtec.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sync_file: Return reasonable timestamp when merging signaled fences
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:01:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1554710495-6646-1-git-send-email-michael.yang@imgtec.com> (raw)
If all the sync points were signaled in both fences a and b,
there was only one sync point in merged fence which is a_fence[0].
The Fence structure in android framework might be confused about
timestamp if there were any sync points which were signaled after
a_fence[0]. It might be more reasonable to use timestamp of last signaled
sync point to represent the merged fence.
The issue can be found from EGL extension ANDROID_get_frame_timestamps.
Sometimes the return value of EGL_READS_DONE_TIME_ANDROID is head of
the return value of EGL_RENDERING_COMPLETE_TIME_ANDROID.
That means display/composition had been completed before rendering
was completed that is incorrect.
Some discussion can be found at:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/907009
Signed-off-by: Michael Yang <michael.yang@imgtec.com>
---
drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
index 4f6305c..d46bfe1 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
@@ -274,8 +274,29 @@ static struct sync_file *sync_file_merge(const char *name, struct sync_file *a,
for (; i_b < b_num_fences; i_b++)
add_fence(fences, &i, b_fences[i_b]);
- if (i == 0)
- fences[i++] = dma_fence_get(a_fences[0]);
+ /* If all the sync pts were signaled, then adding the sync_pt who
+ * was the last signaled to the fence.
+ */
+ if (i == 0) {
+ struct dma_fence *last_signaled_sync_pt = a_fences[0];
+ int iter;
+
+ for (iter = 1; iter < a_num_fences; iter++) {
+ if (ktime_compare(last_signaled_sync_pt->timestamp,
+ a_fences[iter]->timestamp) < 0) {
+ last_signaled_sync_pt = a_fences[iter];
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (iter = 0; iter < b_num_fences; iter++) {
+ if (ktime_compare(last_signaled_sync_pt->timestamp,
+ b_fences[iter]->timestamp) < 0) {
+ last_signaled_sync_pt = b_fences[iter];
+ }
+ }
+
+ fences[i++] = dma_fence_get(last_signaled_sync_pt);
+ }
if (num_fences > i) {
nfences = krealloc(fences, i * sizeof(*fences),
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-08 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-08 8:01 Michael Yang [this message]
2019-04-08 8:01 ` [PATCH] sync_file: Return reasonable timestamp when merging signaled fences Michael Yang
2019-05-09 4:34 ` Michael Yang
2019-05-09 4:34 ` Michael Yang
2019-05-09 11:46 ` Chris Wilson
2019-05-09 11:46 ` Chris Wilson
2019-05-14 7:55 ` [EXTERNAL] " Michael Yang
2019-05-14 7:55 ` Michael Yang
2019-05-14 8:06 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1554710495-6646-1-git-send-email-michael.yang@imgtec.com \
--to=michael.yang@imgtec.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.