Re: [RFC] kexec_file: Add support for purgatory built as PIE

[Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

Hello Baoquan,

Am Freitag, 4. November 2016, 15:38:40 BRST schrieb Baoquan He:
> On 11/02/16 at 04:00am, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > The kexec_file code currently builds the purgatory as a partially linked
> > object (using ld -r). Is there a particular reason to use that instead of
> > a position independent executable (PIE)?
> 
> It's taken as "-r", relocatable in user space kexec-tools too originally.
> I think Vivek just keeps it the same when moving into kernel.

Ok. If that's the only reason then PIE is better suited at least for powerpc.

> > I found a discussion from 2013 in the archives but from what I understood
> > it was about the purgatory as a separate object vs having it linked into
> > the kernel, which is different from what I'm asking:
> > 
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2013-December/010535.html
> > 
> > Here is my motivation for this question:
> >  On ppc64 purgatory.ro has 12 relocation types when built as a partially
> > 
> > linked object. This makes arch_kexec_apply_relocations_add duplicate a lot
> > of code with module_64.c:apply_relocate_add to implement these
> > relocations. The alternative is to do some refactoring so that both
> > functions can share the implementation of the relocations. This is done
> > in patches 5 and 6 of the
> > kexec_file_load implementation for powerpc:
> In user space kexec-tools utility, you also got this problem?

Yes, kexec-tools' purgatory.ro has 10 relocation types instead of 12 (I don't 
know why), but that's still a lot.

> > @@ -942,7 +1085,13 @@ static Elf_Sym *kexec_purgatory_find_symbol(struct
> > purgatory_info *pi,> 
> >  		/* Go through symbols for a match */
> >  		for (k = 0; k < sechdrs[i].sh_size/sizeof(Elf_Sym); k++) {
> > 
> > -			if (ELF_ST_BIND(syms[k].st_info) != STB_GLOBAL)
> > +			/*
> > +			 * FIXME: See if we can or should export the .TOC.
> > +			 * symbol as global instead of searching local symbols
> > +			 * here.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (ELF_ST_BIND(syms[k].st_info) != STB_GLOBAL &&
> > +			    ELF_ST_BIND(syms[k].st_info) != STB_LOCAL)
> > 
> >  				continue;
> >  			
> >  			if (strcmp(strtab + syms[k].st_name, name) != 0)
> > 

I don't need the change above anymore. I found a way to obtain the TOC pointer 
without looking for the .TOC. symbol.

-- 
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec