From: Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@mediatek.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, CC Hwang <cc.hwang@mediatek.com>,
<wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>, Loda Chou <loda.chou@mediatek.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
mtk01761 <wendell.lin@mediatek.com>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: dts: add dts nodes for MT6779
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:46:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1566434764.14794.2.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c533371d-efcd-59dc-0172-3f5775221302@kernel.org>
Hi Marc
> >>> + soc {
> >>> + #address-cells = <2>;
> >>> + #size-cells = <2>;
> >>> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> >>> + ranges;
> >>> +
> >>> + gic: interrupt-controller@0c000000 {
> >>> + compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
> >>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> >>
> >> You also haven't described the CPU PMUs. Depending on how they are wired
> >> (SPIs or PPIs), you may have to change the interrupt-cells property to
> >> include a cell for the PPI partitioning.
> >>
> >
> > pmu nodes would be:
> >
> > pmu {
> > compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
> > interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> > };
> >
> > dsu-pmu-0 {
> > compatible = "arm,dsu-pmu";
> > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 18 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > cpus = <&cpu0>, <&cpu1>, <&cpu2>, <&cpu3>,
> > <&cpu4>, <&cpu5>, <&cpu6>, <&cpu7>;
> > };
> >
> > so I think interrupt-cells could be <3>, will add pmu nodes in v3.
>
> No, that's wrong, at least for the CPU pmu node.
>
> First, you need two of them (one for the A55s, one for the A75s).
> Then you need to partition the corresponding PPI so that they can be
> described as separate affinity sets.
> Finally, this implies that #interrupt-cells goes up to 4, and all the
> interrupts directly routed to the GIC must be updated.
>
> You should have something like this:
>
> &gic {
> ppi-partitions {
> cluster0: interrupt-partition-0 {
> affinity = <&cpu0 &cpu1 &cpu2
> &cpu3 &cpu4 &cpu5>;
> };
>
> cluster1: interrupt-partition-1 {
> affinity = <&cpu6 &cpu7>;
> };
> };
>
> pmu_a55 {
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a55-pmu", "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
> interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW &cluster0>;
> };
>
> pmu_a75 {
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a75-pmu", "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
> interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW &cluster1>;
> };
>
> Please see the rk3399 usage of the binding, as it is the canonical example.
>
> >
Got the idea. Will check rk3399 and fix our part. Thanks for reviewing.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@mediatek.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, CC Hwang <cc.hwang@mediatek.com>,
wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, Loda Chou <loda.chou@mediatek.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
mtk01761 <wendell.lin@mediatek.com>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: dts: add dts nodes for MT6779
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:46:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1566434764.14794.2.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c533371d-efcd-59dc-0172-3f5775221302@kernel.org>
Hi Marc
> >>> + soc {
> >>> + #address-cells = <2>;
> >>> + #size-cells = <2>;
> >>> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> >>> + ranges;
> >>> +
> >>> + gic: interrupt-controller@0c000000 {
> >>> + compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
> >>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> >>
> >> You also haven't described the CPU PMUs. Depending on how they are wired
> >> (SPIs or PPIs), you may have to change the interrupt-cells property to
> >> include a cell for the PPI partitioning.
> >>
> >
> > pmu nodes would be:
> >
> > pmu {
> > compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
> > interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> > };
> >
> > dsu-pmu-0 {
> > compatible = "arm,dsu-pmu";
> > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 18 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > cpus = <&cpu0>, <&cpu1>, <&cpu2>, <&cpu3>,
> > <&cpu4>, <&cpu5>, <&cpu6>, <&cpu7>;
> > };
> >
> > so I think interrupt-cells could be <3>, will add pmu nodes in v3.
>
> No, that's wrong, at least for the CPU pmu node.
>
> First, you need two of them (one for the A55s, one for the A75s).
> Then you need to partition the corresponding PPI so that they can be
> described as separate affinity sets.
> Finally, this implies that #interrupt-cells goes up to 4, and all the
> interrupts directly routed to the GIC must be updated.
>
> You should have something like this:
>
> &gic {
> ppi-partitions {
> cluster0: interrupt-partition-0 {
> affinity = <&cpu0 &cpu1 &cpu2
> &cpu3 &cpu4 &cpu5>;
> };
>
> cluster1: interrupt-partition-1 {
> affinity = <&cpu6 &cpu7>;
> };
> };
>
> pmu_a55 {
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a55-pmu", "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
> interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW &cluster0>;
> };
>
> pmu_a75 {
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a75-pmu", "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
> interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW &cluster1>;
> };
>
> Please see the rk3399 usage of the binding, as it is the canonical example.
>
> >
Got the idea. Will check rk3399 and fix our part. Thanks for reviewing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-22 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-19 9:21 [PATCHv2 00/11] Add basic SoC Support for Mediatek MT6779 SoC Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 9:21 ` Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: mediatek: add support for mt6779 reference board Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 9:21 ` Mars Cheng
2019-08-23 15:50 ` Matthias Brugger
2019-08-19 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: mtk-uart: add mt6779 uart bindings Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 9:21 ` Mars Cheng
2019-08-23 15:47 ` Matthias Brugger
2019-08-19 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] dt-bindings: irq: mtk,sysirq: add support for mt6779 Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 9:21 ` Mars Cheng
2019-08-23 8:51 ` Linus Walleij
2019-08-23 15:51 ` Matthias Brugger
2019-08-23 15:44 ` Matthias Brugger
2019-08-27 16:50 ` Rob Herring
2019-08-27 16:50 ` Rob Herring
2019-08-19 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] pinctrl: mediatek: update pinmux definitions " Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 9:21 ` Mars Cheng
2019-08-23 15:53 ` Matthias Brugger
2020-01-02 4:04 ` Hanks Chen
2020-01-02 4:04 ` Hanks Chen
2019-08-19 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] pinctrl: mediatek: avoid virtual gpio trying to set reg Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 9:21 ` Mars Cheng
2019-08-23 8:57 ` Linus Walleij
2019-12-22 13:52 ` Hanks Chen
2019-12-22 13:52 ` Hanks Chen
2020-01-07 10:20 ` Linus Walleij
2020-01-07 10:20 ` Linus Walleij
2020-01-08 11:27 ` Hanks Chen
2020-01-08 11:27 ` Hanks Chen
2019-08-19 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] pinctrl: mediatek: add pinctrl support for MT6779 SoC Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 9:21 ` Mars Cheng
2019-08-22 18:12 ` Sean Wang
2019-08-23 8:59 ` Linus Walleij
2019-08-19 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] pinctrl: mediatek: add mt6779 eint support Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 9:21 ` Mars Cheng
2019-08-22 18:13 ` Sean Wang
2019-08-19 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] dt-bindings: mediatek: bindings for MT6779 clk Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 9:21 ` Mars Cheng
2019-08-27 16:52 ` Rob Herring
2019-09-10 14:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-19 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] clk: mediatek: Add dt-bindings for MT6779 clocks Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 9:21 ` Mars Cheng
2019-08-27 16:53 ` Rob Herring
2019-09-10 14:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-19 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] clk: mediatek: Add MT6779 clock support Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 9:21 ` Mars Cheng
2019-09-10 14:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-19 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: dts: add dts nodes for MT6779 Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 9:21 ` Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-19 11:42 ` Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 11:42 ` Mars Cheng
2019-08-19 12:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-22 0:46 ` Mars Cheng [this message]
2019-08-22 0:46 ` Mars Cheng
2019-08-23 16:13 ` Matthias Brugger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1566434764.14794.2.camel@mtkswgap22 \
--to=mars.cheng@mediatek.com \
--cc=cc.hwang@mediatek.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=loda.chou@mediatek.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.wang@kernel.org \
--cc=wendell.lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.