From: Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM>
To: Bryan Whitehead <driver@jpl.nasa.gov>
Cc: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, Nick LeRoy <nleroy@cs.wisc.edu>,
jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFS?
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 22:33:23 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15744.56819.247501.512522@laputa.namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D80DC19.4080508@jpl.nasa.gov>
Bryan Whitehead writes:
> Hans Reiser wrote:
> > Nick LeRoy wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Think about this: Namesys is working on Reiserfs v4.0. v4.0. Hell -
> >> it's only been incorporated into the mainstream kernel for less than a
> >> year (at least by my recollection), yet it keeps advancing. I have
> >> _no_ idea what UFS version Solaris 8 is using (admittedly at least
> >> somewhat due to ignorance -- I use Solaris because I have a good ol'
> >> SPARCprinter which alas is not supported by Linux), or whether they've
> >> bother to do development on it to make it better, faster, etc. Yet,
> >> _we_ get this advancement all the time. Isn't it great?!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > I think you'll really like v4, it is a complete rewrite from scratch,
> > and far better in every way. :)
> >
> > Hans
>
> What blows my mind (from someone that only watches kernel development)
> is how one project, XFS, a filesystem basically "done" is excluded from
> the mainline kernel while ReiserFS is getting a "complete rewrite from
> scratch".
>
> Maybe I don't get it cause I'm just watching... ;)
Then you missed "reiserfs inclusion into the kernel" soap opera.
And besides, reiserfs in mainline to no extent means reiser4 in mainline
(unfortunately).
>
> --
> Bryan Whitehead
Nikita.
> SysAdmin - JPL - Interferometry Systems and Technology
> Phone: 818 354 2903
> driver@jpl.nasa.gov
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-12 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020909193820.GA2007@lnuxlab.ath.cx.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209091457590.3793-100000@hawkeye.luckynet.adm.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-09-09 21:12 ` XFS? Andi Kleen
2002-09-09 21:20 ` XFS? Shawn
2002-09-09 21:27 ` XFS? Robert Love
2002-09-10 17:15 ` XFS? Mike Galbraith
2002-09-10 19:23 ` XFS? Shawn
2002-09-10 19:29 ` XFS? Robert Love
2002-09-10 19:33 ` XFS? Thunder from the hill
2002-09-11 0:33 ` XFS? Bryan Whitehead
2002-09-10 20:06 ` XFS? John Alvord
2002-09-10 20:17 ` XFS? Hans Reiser
2002-09-10 20:17 ` XFS? Joe Kellner
2002-09-10 20:26 ` XFS? David Lang
2002-09-10 20:31 ` XFS? Tomas Szepe
2002-09-11 2:34 ` XFS? Bernd Eckenfels
2002-09-10 22:18 ` XFS? Nick LeRoy
2002-09-10 20:34 ` XFS? Tomas Szepe
2002-09-10 21:01 ` XFS? Steve Lord
2002-09-11 8:43 ` XFS? jw schultz
2002-09-11 15:20 ` XFS? Nick LeRoy
2002-09-11 17:08 ` XFS? Hans Reiser
2002-09-11 17:13 ` [OT] XFS? Joe Kellner
2002-09-11 17:18 ` Hans Reiser
2002-09-11 19:51 ` Remco Post
2002-09-11 18:24 ` XFS? Gerhard Mack
2002-09-11 18:54 ` XFS? Lorenzo Allegrucci
2002-09-12 18:25 ` XFS? Bryan Whitehead
2002-09-12 18:33 ` Nikita Danilov [this message]
2002-09-13 11:44 ` XFS? Bill Davidsen
2002-09-13 12:44 ` XFS? Hans Reiser
2002-09-13 15:47 ` XFS? Bill Davidsen
2002-09-12 23:38 ` XFS? Samuel Flory
2002-09-11 21:21 ` XFS? jw schultz
2002-09-11 22:41 ` XFS? Nick LeRoy
2002-09-11 23:01 ` XFS? Robert Varga
2002-09-12 2:48 ` XFS? jw schultz
2002-09-11 4:56 ` XFS? Mike Galbraith
2002-09-11 14:55 ` XFS? Shawn
2002-09-11 17:52 ` XFS? Mike Galbraith
2002-09-11 15:12 ` XFS? Bill Davidsen
2002-09-11 16:03 ` XFS? Alan Cox
2002-09-11 18:55 ` XFS? Eric Sandeen
2002-09-11 21:37 ` XFS? Alan Cox
2002-09-13 10:52 XFS? Kostadin Karaivanov
2002-09-13 10:57 ` XFS? Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-13 7:47 XFS? Ivan Ivanov
2002-09-13 9:32 ` XFS? Nero
2002-09-13 10:22 ` XFS? Ivan Ivanov
2002-09-13 11:07 ` XFS? Filip Van Raemdonck
2002-09-13 12:42 ` XFS? Hans Reiser
2002-09-13 9:53 ` XFS? Remco Post
2002-09-13 11:38 ` XFS? Hans Reiser
2002-09-13 12:47 ` XFS? Jesse Pollard
2002-09-13 13:33 ` XFS? Ian S. Nelson
[not found] <3D80CCEF.7070007@tmsusa.com>
2002-09-12 17:53 ` XFS? jbradford
[not found] <200209121553.g8CFrrEh003646@dstl.gov.uk>
2002-09-12 16:03 ` XFS? Tony Gale
2002-09-13 5:58 ` XFS? Tomas Szepe
2002-09-12 15:27 XFS? Martin Knoblauch
2002-09-12 15:53 ` XFS? jbradford
2002-09-12 17:06 ` XFS? Thunder from the hill
2002-09-12 17:28 ` XFS? Joe Kellner
2002-09-12 17:44 ` XFS? Thunder from the hill
2002-09-12 17:54 ` XFS? Joe Kellner
2002-09-12 17:09 ` XFS? Bernd Petrovitsch
2002-09-12 17:45 ` XFS? Thunder from the hill
2002-09-12 13:54 XFS? Martin Knoblauch
2002-09-12 13:42 XFS? Martin Knoblauch
2002-09-12 15:00 ` XFS? jbradford
2002-09-13 11:53 ` XFS? Bill Davidsen
2002-09-13 12:27 ` XFS? jbradford
2002-09-13 13:21 ` XFS? jlnance
[not found] <1059487013@toto.iv>
2002-09-11 0:31 ` XFS? Peter Chubb
2002-09-09 19:38 XFS? khromy
[not found] ` <3D7CFEE5.3030600@netscape.net>
2002-09-09 20:08 ` XFS? Wade
2002-09-09 20:16 ` XFS? Tomas Szepe
2002-09-09 20:43 ` XFS? Arador
2002-09-09 21:18 ` XFS? Shawn
2002-09-09 22:31 ` XFS? Rik van Riel
2002-09-10 6:23 ` XFS? Wade
2002-09-10 13:24 ` XFS? Gerhard Mack
2002-09-09 21:00 ` XFS? Thunder from the hill
2002-09-09 22:29 ` XFS? Joe Kellner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15744.56819.247501.512522@laputa.namesys.com \
--to=nikita@namesys.com \
--cc=driver@jpl.nasa.gov \
--cc=jw@pegasys.ws \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nleroy@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.