Re: [PATCH v6, 13/14] drm/mediatek: add fifo_size into rdma private data

[Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>]

On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 13:20 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Yongqiang:
> 
> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 12:00 +0800, Yongqiang Niu wrote:
> > the fifo size of rdma in mt8183 is different.
> > rdma0 fifo size is 5k
> > rdma1 fifo size is 2k
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> > index 405afef..691480b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c
> > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct mtk_disp_rdma {
> >  	struct mtk_ddp_comp		ddp_comp;
> >  	struct drm_crtc			*crtc;
> >  	const struct mtk_disp_rdma_data	*data;
> > +	u32				fifo_size;
> >  };
> >  
> >  static inline struct mtk_disp_rdma *comp_to_rdma(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp)
> > @@ -130,10 +131,16 @@ static void mtk_rdma_config(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp, unsigned int width,
> >  	unsigned int threshold;
> >  	unsigned int reg;
> >  	struct mtk_disp_rdma *rdma = comp_to_rdma(comp);
> > +	u32 rdma_fifo_size;
> >  
> >  	rdma_update_bits(comp, DISP_REG_RDMA_SIZE_CON_0, 0xfff, width);
> >  	rdma_update_bits(comp, DISP_REG_RDMA_SIZE_CON_1, 0xfffff, height);
> >  
> > +	if (rdma->fifo_size)
> > +		rdma_fifo_size = rdma->fifo_size;
> > +	else
> > +		rdma_fifo_size = RDMA_FIFO_SIZE(rdma);
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Enable FIFO underflow since DSI and DPI can't be blocked.
> >  	 * Keep the FIFO pseudo size reset default of 8 KiB. Set the
> > @@ -142,7 +149,7 @@ static void mtk_rdma_config(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp, unsigned int width,
> >  	 */
> >  	threshold = width * height * vrefresh * 4 * 7 / 1000000;
> >  	reg = RDMA_FIFO_UNDERFLOW_EN |
> > -	      RDMA_FIFO_PSEUDO_SIZE(RDMA_FIFO_SIZE(rdma)) |
> > +	      RDMA_FIFO_PSEUDO_SIZE(rdma_fifo_size) |
> >  	      RDMA_OUTPUT_VALID_FIFO_THRESHOLD(threshold);
> >  	writel(reg, comp->regs + DISP_REG_RDMA_FIFO_CON);
> >  }
> > @@ -284,6 +291,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_rdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  		return comp_id;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "mediatek,rdma_fifo_size", &ret)) {
> 
> "mediatek,rdma_fifo_size" does not exists in binding document.
> 
> > +		ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node,
> > +					   "mediatek,rdma_fifo_size",
> > +					   &priv->fifo_size);
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to get rdma fifo size\n");
> > +			return ret;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		priv->fifo_size *= SZ_1K;
> 
> Why not define fifo_size in 'bytes' ?
> 
> Regards,
> CK

this is align the definition of fifo_size in mtk_disp_rdma_data, it is
SZ_1K, 
and the macro RDMA_FIFO_PSEUDO_SIZE calculated with SZ_1K
> 
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	ret = mtk_ddp_comp_init(dev, dev->of_node, &priv->ddp_comp, comp_id,
> >  				&mtk_disp_rdma_funcs);
> >  	if (ret) {
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek