From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, alexander.deucher@amd.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm: Remove PageReserved manipulation from drm_pci_alloc" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:32:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <158695037014053@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From ea36ec8623f56791c6ff6738d0509b7920f85220 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 17:16:31 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] drm: Remove PageReserved manipulation from drm_pci_alloc
drm_pci_alloc/drm_pci_free are very thin wrappers around the core dma
facilities, and we have no special reason within the drm layer to behave
differently. In particular, since
commit de09d31dd38a50fdce106c15abd68432eebbd014
Author: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri Jan 15 16:51:42 2016 -0800
page-flags: define PG_reserved behavior on compound pages
As far as I can see there's no users of PG_reserved on compound pages.
Let's use PF_NO_COMPOUND here.
it has been illegal to combine GFP_COMP with SetPageReserved, so lets
stop doing both and leave the dma layer to its own devices.
Reported-by: Taketo Kabe
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1027
Fixes: de09d31dd38a ("page-flags: define PG_reserved behavior on compound pages")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.5+
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200202171635.4039044-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
index f2e43d341980..d16dac4325f9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
@@ -51,8 +51,6 @@
drm_dma_handle_t *drm_pci_alloc(struct drm_device * dev, size_t size, size_t align)
{
drm_dma_handle_t *dmah;
- unsigned long addr;
- size_t sz;
/* pci_alloc_consistent only guarantees alignment to the smallest
* PAGE_SIZE order which is greater than or equal to the requested size.
@@ -68,20 +66,13 @@ drm_dma_handle_t *drm_pci_alloc(struct drm_device * dev, size_t size, size_t ali
dmah->size = size;
dmah->vaddr = dma_alloc_coherent(&dev->pdev->dev, size,
&dmah->busaddr,
- GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_COMP);
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (dmah->vaddr == NULL) {
kfree(dmah);
return NULL;
}
- /* XXX - Is virt_to_page() legal for consistent mem? */
- /* Reserve */
- for (addr = (unsigned long)dmah->vaddr, sz = size;
- sz > 0; addr += PAGE_SIZE, sz -= PAGE_SIZE) {
- SetPageReserved(virt_to_page((void *)addr));
- }
-
return dmah;
}
@@ -94,19 +85,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_pci_alloc);
*/
void __drm_legacy_pci_free(struct drm_device * dev, drm_dma_handle_t * dmah)
{
- unsigned long addr;
- size_t sz;
-
- if (dmah->vaddr) {
- /* XXX - Is virt_to_page() legal for consistent mem? */
- /* Unreserve */
- for (addr = (unsigned long)dmah->vaddr, sz = dmah->size;
- sz > 0; addr += PAGE_SIZE, sz -= PAGE_SIZE) {
- ClearPageReserved(virt_to_page((void *)addr));
- }
+ if (dmah->vaddr)
dma_free_coherent(&dev->pdev->dev, dmah->size, dmah->vaddr,
dmah->busaddr);
- }
}
/**
next reply other threads:[~2020-04-15 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-15 11:32 gregkh [this message]
2020-04-16 2:31 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm: Remove PageReserved manipulation from drm_pci_alloc" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree Sasha Levin
2020-04-16 7:07 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=158695037014053@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.