All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, "Anton Blanchard" <anton@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	"David Gibson" <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: inline doorbell sending functions
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 01:58:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1593482195.vpy5eylip3.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zh8l7318.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>

Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of June 30, 2020 11:31 am:
> kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> writes:
>> Hi Nicholas,
>>
>> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
>> [also build test ERROR on scottwood/next v5.8-rc2 next-20200626]
>> [cannot apply to kvm-ppc/kvm-ppc-next]
>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use  as documented in
>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>>
>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nicholas-Piggin/powerpc-pseries-IPI-doorbell-improvements/20200627-230544
>> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
>> config: powerpc-randconfig-c003-20200628 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
> 
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>
>> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>    In file included from arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:38:
>>    arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h: In function 'doorbell_global_ipi':
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h:114:12: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_hard_smp_processor_id'; did you mean 'raw_smp_processor_id'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>      114 |  u32 tag = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu);
>>          |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>          |            raw_smp_processor_id
>>    arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h: In function 'doorbell_try_core_ipi':
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h:146:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_sibling_mask'; did you mean 'cpu_online_mask'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>      146 |  if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(this_cpu))) {
>>          |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>          |                            cpu_online_mask
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h:146:28: warning: passing argument 2 of 'cpumask_test_cpu' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
>>      146 |  if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(this_cpu))) {
>>          |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Seems like CONFIG_SMP=n is probably the root cause.
> 
> You could try including asm/smp.h, but good chance that will lead to
> header soup.

Possibly. dbell.h shouldn't be included by much, but maybe it gets
dragged in.

> 
> Other option would be to wrap the whole lot in #ifdef CONFIG_SMP?

Yeah that might be a better idea.

I'll fix it up and repost if there's no strong objections to
the KVM detection bit.

Thanks,
Nick

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, "Anton Blanchard" <anton@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	"David Gibson" <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: inline doorbell sending functions
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:58:30 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1593482195.vpy5eylip3.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zh8l7318.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>

Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of June 30, 2020 11:31 am:
> kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> writes:
>> Hi Nicholas,
>>
>> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
>> [also build test ERROR on scottwood/next v5.8-rc2 next-20200626]
>> [cannot apply to kvm-ppc/kvm-ppc-next]
>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use  as documented in
>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>>
>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nicholas-Piggin/powerpc-pseries-IPI-doorbell-improvements/20200627-230544
>> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
>> config: powerpc-randconfig-c003-20200628 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
> 
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>
>> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>    In file included from arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:38:
>>    arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h: In function 'doorbell_global_ipi':
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h:114:12: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_hard_smp_processor_id'; did you mean 'raw_smp_processor_id'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>      114 |  u32 tag = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu);
>>          |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>          |            raw_smp_processor_id
>>    arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h: In function 'doorbell_try_core_ipi':
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h:146:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_sibling_mask'; did you mean 'cpu_online_mask'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>      146 |  if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(this_cpu))) {
>>          |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>          |                            cpu_online_mask
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h:146:28: warning: passing argument 2 of 'cpumask_test_cpu' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
>>      146 |  if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(this_cpu))) {
>>          |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Seems like CONFIG_SMP=n is probably the root cause.
> 
> You could try including asm/smp.h, but good chance that will lead to
> header soup.

Possibly. dbell.h shouldn't be included by much, but maybe it gets
dragged in.

> 
> Other option would be to wrap the whole lot in #ifdef CONFIG_SMP?

Yeah that might be a better idea.

I'll fix it up and repost if there's no strong objections to
the KVM detection bit.

Thanks,
Nick

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-30  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-27 15:04 [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/pseries: IPI doorbell improvements Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-27 15:04 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-27 15:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: inline doorbell sending functions Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-27 15:04   ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-27 19:46   ` kernel test robot
2020-06-27 19:46     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-27 19:46     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-30  1:31     ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-30  1:31       ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-30  1:31       ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-30  1:58       ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2020-06-30  1:58         ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-27 15:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/pseries: Use doorbells even if XIVE is available Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-27 15:04   ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-27 15:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/pseries: Add KVM guest doorbell restrictions Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-27 15:04   ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-30  2:27   ` Paul Mackerras
2020-06-30  2:27     ` Paul Mackerras
2020-06-30  5:35     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-30  5:35       ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-30  8:26       ` Paul Mackerras
2020-06-30  8:26         ` Paul Mackerras
2020-06-30 11:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-30 11:57           ` Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1593482195.vpy5eylip3.astroid@bobo.none \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=anton@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.