All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org,
	OpenEmbedded Devel List
	<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [oe] RFC: meta-oe appends and overlayed recipes
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:53:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1595049.kBrd3spHgv@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKoX7NLK_MYKEFXVCrk-FDg5RKnfZCxpOxXhP52et2jgjg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday 12 February 2013 14:44:58 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 12 February 2013 at 10:24, Burton, Ross wrote:
> >> > * meta-oe/recipes-extended/polkit/polkit_0.104.bbappend
> >> > Another bbappend apparently for systemd support. Again, this should
> >> > have been moved to meta-systemd; do we now need to merge it into
> >> > OE-Core?
> >> 
> >> Yes, half of it has been merged to master already. The rest should be
> >> in Radu's branch, we can sort that today.
> > 
> > I take that back - polkit in oe-core supports systemd if enabled, so this
> > append can be removed.
>
> In fact we cannot drop the bbappend or we break the upgrade path
> (except if we bump PR in OE-Core to keep it).

These do need to be dropped; if bumping PR in OE-Core is what has to happen to 
achieve that then so be it.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org,
	OpenEmbedded Devel List
	<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] RFC: meta-oe appends and overlayed recipes
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:53:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1595049.kBrd3spHgv@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKoX7NLK_MYKEFXVCrk-FDg5RKnfZCxpOxXhP52et2jgjg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday 12 February 2013 14:44:58 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 12 February 2013 at 10:24, Burton, Ross wrote:
> >> > * meta-oe/recipes-extended/polkit/polkit_0.104.bbappend
> >> > Another bbappend apparently for systemd support. Again, this should
> >> > have been moved to meta-systemd; do we now need to merge it into
> >> > OE-Core?
> >> 
> >> Yes, half of it has been merged to master already. The rest should be
> >> in Radu's branch, we can sort that today.
> > 
> > I take that back - polkit in oe-core supports systemd if enabled, so this
> > append can be removed.
>
> In fact we cannot drop the bbappend or we break the upgrade path
> (except if we bump PR in OE-Core to keep it).

These do need to be dropped; if bumping PR in OE-Core is what has to happen to 
achieve that then so be it.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre



  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-12 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-11 17:09 RFC: meta-oe appends and overlayed recipes Paul Eggleton
2013-02-11 17:50 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-02-11 17:50   ` [OE-core] " Otavio Salvador
2013-02-12  8:38   ` Anders Darander
2013-02-12  8:38     ` [OE-core] " Anders Darander
2013-02-11 22:35 ` Richard Purdie
2013-02-11 22:35   ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2013-02-12  9:24   ` Paul Eggleton
2013-02-12  9:24     ` [OE-core] " Paul Eggleton
2013-02-12 13:10     ` Richard Purdie
2013-02-12 13:10       ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2013-02-12 13:38       ` Paul Eggleton
2013-02-12 13:38         ` [OE-core] " Paul Eggleton
2013-02-12 10:24 ` [oe] " Burton, Ross
2013-02-12 10:24   ` Burton, Ross
2013-02-12 10:38   ` [oe] " Paul Eggleton
2013-02-12 10:38     ` [OE-core] " Paul Eggleton
2013-02-12 16:43     ` [oe] " Otavio Salvador
2013-02-12 16:43       ` [OE-core] " Otavio Salvador
2013-02-12 20:51       ` [oe] " Burton, Ross
2013-02-12 20:51         ` [OE-core] " Burton, Ross
2013-02-12 21:22         ` [oe] " Martin Jansa
2013-02-12 21:22           ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2013-02-12 21:36           ` [oe] " Burton, Ross
2013-02-12 21:36             ` [OE-core] " Burton, Ross
2013-02-12 21:40             ` [oe] " Otavio Salvador
2013-02-12 21:40               ` [OE-core] " Otavio Salvador
2013-02-12 21:53             ` [oe] " Eric Bénard
2013-02-12 21:53               ` [OE-core] " Eric Bénard
2013-02-12 22:02               ` [oe] " Burton, Ross
2013-02-12 22:02                 ` [OE-core] " Burton, Ross
2013-02-12 15:50   ` [oe] " Ross Burton
2013-02-12 15:50     ` Ross Burton
2013-02-12 16:44     ` [oe] " Otavio Salvador
2013-02-12 16:44       ` [OE-core] " Otavio Salvador
2013-02-12 16:53       ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2013-02-12 16:53         ` Paul Eggleton
2013-02-12 19:19 ` Martin Jansa
2013-02-12 19:19   ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2013-02-12 19:31   ` [oe] " Otavio Salvador
2013-02-12 19:31     ` [OE-core] " Otavio Salvador
2013-02-12 19:32   ` Paul Eggleton
2013-02-12 19:32     ` [OE-core] " Paul Eggleton
2013-02-12 19:51     ` Martin Jansa
2013-02-12 19:51       ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2013-02-12 20:40       ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2013-02-12 19:32   ` [oe] " Chris Larson
2013-02-12 19:32     ` [OE-core] " Chris Larson
2013-02-12 19:59     ` [oe] " Mark Hatle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1595049.kBrd3spHgv@helios \
    --to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.