From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] docs: update trusted-encrypted.rst
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 16:36:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1597595769.8344.7.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf667ea0-dab7-a242-886c-938582c62ff6@linux.ibm.com>
On Sun, 2020-08-16 at 12:06 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
[...]
> A note in this file states this:
>
> Note: When using a TPM 2.0 with a persistent key with handle
> 0x81000001, append 'keyhandle=0x81000001' to statements between
> quotes, such as "new 32 keyhandle=0x81000001".
>
> Now if someone was (still) interested in TPM 1.2 then the below
> changes you are proposing wouldn't work for them. Maybe you should
> adapt the note to state that these keyhandle=... should be removed
> for the TPM 1.2 case.
Actually, I also have a plan to match what userspace does and simply
assume a keyhandle of 40000001 (generate an EC Storage Primary Key on
the fly) if it's not specified, which will make the TPM1.2 and 2.0
versions of this the same. Unfortunately the necessary precursor
patches are taking an age to get upstream.
James
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] docs: update trusted-encrypted.rst
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 09:36:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1597595769.8344.7.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf667ea0-dab7-a242-886c-938582c62ff6@linux.ibm.com>
On Sun, 2020-08-16 at 12:06 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
[...]
> A note in this file states this:
>
> Note: When using a TPM 2.0 with a persistent key with handle
> 0x81000001, append 'keyhandle=0x81000001' to statements between
> quotes, such as "new 32 keyhandle=0x81000001".
>
> Now if someone was (still) interested in TPM 1.2 then the below
> changes you are proposing wouldn't work for them. Maybe you should
> adapt the note to state that these keyhandle=... should be removed
> for the TPM 1.2 case.
Actually, I also have a plan to match what userspace does and simply
assume a keyhandle of 40000001 (generate an EC Storage Primary Key on
the fly) if it's not specified, which will make the TPM1.2 and 2.0
versions of this the same. Unfortunately the necessary precursor
patches are taking an age to get upstream.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-16 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-15 7:51 [PATCH RESEND] docs: update trusted-encrypted.rst Coly Li
2020-08-15 7:51 ` Coly Li
2020-08-15 12:46 ` colyli
2020-08-15 12:46 ` colyli
2020-08-16 16:06 ` Stefan Berger
2020-08-16 16:06 ` Stefan Berger
2020-08-16 16:36 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2020-08-16 16:36 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-16 16:57 ` Coly Li
2020-08-16 16:57 ` Coly Li
2020-08-16 17:12 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-16 17:12 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-16 17:15 ` Coly Li
2020-08-16 17:15 ` Coly Li
2020-08-18 15:44 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-18 15:44 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-18 16:19 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-18 16:19 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-19 21:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-19 21:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-16 17:01 ` Coly Li
2020-08-16 17:01 ` Coly Li
2020-08-16 17:08 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-16 17:08 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-16 17:22 ` Coly Li
2020-08-16 17:22 ` Coly Li
2020-08-16 17:05 ` Coly Li
2020-08-16 17:05 ` Coly Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1597595769.8344.7.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.