* is "fakeroot" still used as a variable "flag"?
@ 2012-03-31 23:12 Robert P. J. Day
2012-03-31 23:46 ` Paul Eggleton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2012-03-31 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OE Core mailing list
the bitbake manual lists "fakeroot" as a possible variable flag,
along with things like "nostamp", "noexec" and so on. but i don't see
fakeroot being used as a flag anywhere in the source tree. has that
changed?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: is "fakeroot" still used as a variable "flag"?
2012-03-31 23:12 is "fakeroot" still used as a variable "flag"? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2012-03-31 23:46 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-03-31 23:52 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2012-03-31 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: openembedded-core
On Saturday 31 March 2012 19:12:12 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> the bitbake manual lists "fakeroot" as a possible variable flag,
> along with things like "nostamp", "noexec" and so on. but i don't see
> fakeroot being used as a flag anywhere in the source tree. has that
> changed?
No, fakeroot is still used - it is a flag for functions indicating fakeroot
(these days pseudo) should be enabled when the function is executed.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: is "fakeroot" still used as a variable "flag"?
2012-03-31 23:46 ` Paul Eggleton
@ 2012-03-31 23:52 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2012-03-31 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Eggleton; +Cc: openembedded-core
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Saturday 31 March 2012 19:12:12 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > the bitbake manual lists "fakeroot" as a possible variable flag,
> > along with things like "nostamp", "noexec" and so on. but i don't see
> > fakeroot being used as a flag anywhere in the source tree. has that
> > changed?
>
> No, fakeroot is still used - it is a flag for functions indicating fakeroot
> (these days pseudo) should be enabled when the function is executed.
whoops, never mind, i misread that section in the manual.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-01 0:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-31 23:12 is "fakeroot" still used as a variable "flag"? Robert P. J. Day
2012-03-31 23:46 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-03-31 23:52 ` Robert P. J. Day
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.