From: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
To: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
Cc: Zhanyong Wang <zhanyong.wang@mediatek.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tianping Fang <tianping.fang@mediatek.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] usb: xhci-mtk: fix unreleased bandwidth data
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:29:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1610612988.30053.15.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAATdQgD2OAmf7_NWSVwzyJE7mF0vngzE=QeE79PS7MJsgPhbtA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ikjoon,
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 13:48 +0800, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:44 PM Mathias Nyman
> <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 8.1.2021 8.11, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 13:09 +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> > >> On 29.12.2020 8.24, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
> > >>> xhci-mtk has hooks on add_endpoint() and drop_endpoint() from xhci
> > >>> to handle its own sw bandwidth managements and stores bandwidth data
> > >>> into internal table every time add_endpoint() is called,
> > >>> so when bandwidth allocation fails at one endpoint, all earlier
> > >>> allocation from the same interface could still remain at the table.
> > >>>
> > >>> This patch adds two more hooks from check_bandwidth() and
> > >>> reset_bandwidth(), and make mtk-xhci to releases all failed endpoints
> > >>> from reset_bandwidth().
> > >>>
> > >>> Fixes: 08e469de87a2 ("usb: xhci-mtk: supports bandwidth scheduling with multi-TT")
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> ...
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> > >>> index d4a8d0efbbc4..e1fcd3cf723f 100644
> > >>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> > >>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> > >>> @@ -2882,6 +2882,12 @@ static int xhci_check_bandwidth(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev)
> > >>> xhci_dbg(xhci, "%s called for udev %p\n", __func__, udev);
> > >>> virt_dev = xhci->devs[udev->slot_id];
> > >>>
> > >>> + if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_MTK_HOST) {
> > >>> + ret = xhci_mtk_check_bandwidth(hcd, udev);
> > >>> + if (ret < 0)
> > >>> + return ret;
> > >>> + }
> > >>> +
> > >>
> > >> Just noticed that XHCI_MTK_HOST quirk is only set in xhci-mtk.c.
> > >> xhci-mtk.c calls xhci_init_driver(..., xhci_mtk_overrides) with a .reset override function.
> > >>
> > >> why not add override functions for .check_bandwidth and .reset_bandwidth to xhci_mtk_overrides instead?
> > >>
> > >> Another patch to add similar overrides for .add_endpoint and .drop_endpoint should probably be
> > >> done so that we can get rid of the xhci_mtk_add/drop_ep_quirk() calls in xhci.c as well
> > > You mean, we can export xhci_add/drop_endpoint()?
> >
> > I think so, unless you have a better idea.
> > I prefer exporting the generic add/drop_endpoint functions rather than the vendor specific quirk functions.
> >
>
> When moving out all MTK_HOST quirks and unlink xhci-mtk-sch from xhci,
> xhci-mtk-sch still needs to touch the xhci internals, at least struct
> xhci_ep_ctx.
>
> My naive idea is just let xhci export one more function to expose xhci_ep_ctx.
> But I'm not sure whether this is acceptable:
I find that xhci_add_endpoint() ignores some errors with return 0, for
these cases we needn't call xhci_mtk_add_ep-quirk(), so may be not a
good way to just export xhci_add_endpoint().
>
> +struct xhci_ep_ctx* xhci_get_ep_contex(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct
> usb_host_endpoint *ep)
> +{ ... }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xhci_get_ep_context);
>
> But for v6, I'm going to submit a patch with {check|reset}_bandwidth()
> quirk function
> switched into xhci_driver_overrides first. (and preserve existing
> MTK_HOST quirk functions).
>
> Thanks!
>
> > -Mathias
> >
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
To: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Tianping Fang <tianping.fang@mediatek.com>,
Zhanyong Wang <zhanyong.wang@mediatek.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] usb: xhci-mtk: fix unreleased bandwidth data
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:29:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1610612988.30053.15.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAATdQgD2OAmf7_NWSVwzyJE7mF0vngzE=QeE79PS7MJsgPhbtA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ikjoon,
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 13:48 +0800, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:44 PM Mathias Nyman
> <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 8.1.2021 8.11, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 13:09 +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> > >> On 29.12.2020 8.24, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
> > >>> xhci-mtk has hooks on add_endpoint() and drop_endpoint() from xhci
> > >>> to handle its own sw bandwidth managements and stores bandwidth data
> > >>> into internal table every time add_endpoint() is called,
> > >>> so when bandwidth allocation fails at one endpoint, all earlier
> > >>> allocation from the same interface could still remain at the table.
> > >>>
> > >>> This patch adds two more hooks from check_bandwidth() and
> > >>> reset_bandwidth(), and make mtk-xhci to releases all failed endpoints
> > >>> from reset_bandwidth().
> > >>>
> > >>> Fixes: 08e469de87a2 ("usb: xhci-mtk: supports bandwidth scheduling with multi-TT")
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> ...
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> > >>> index d4a8d0efbbc4..e1fcd3cf723f 100644
> > >>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> > >>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> > >>> @@ -2882,6 +2882,12 @@ static int xhci_check_bandwidth(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev)
> > >>> xhci_dbg(xhci, "%s called for udev %p\n", __func__, udev);
> > >>> virt_dev = xhci->devs[udev->slot_id];
> > >>>
> > >>> + if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_MTK_HOST) {
> > >>> + ret = xhci_mtk_check_bandwidth(hcd, udev);
> > >>> + if (ret < 0)
> > >>> + return ret;
> > >>> + }
> > >>> +
> > >>
> > >> Just noticed that XHCI_MTK_HOST quirk is only set in xhci-mtk.c.
> > >> xhci-mtk.c calls xhci_init_driver(..., xhci_mtk_overrides) with a .reset override function.
> > >>
> > >> why not add override functions for .check_bandwidth and .reset_bandwidth to xhci_mtk_overrides instead?
> > >>
> > >> Another patch to add similar overrides for .add_endpoint and .drop_endpoint should probably be
> > >> done so that we can get rid of the xhci_mtk_add/drop_ep_quirk() calls in xhci.c as well
> > > You mean, we can export xhci_add/drop_endpoint()?
> >
> > I think so, unless you have a better idea.
> > I prefer exporting the generic add/drop_endpoint functions rather than the vendor specific quirk functions.
> >
>
> When moving out all MTK_HOST quirks and unlink xhci-mtk-sch from xhci,
> xhci-mtk-sch still needs to touch the xhci internals, at least struct
> xhci_ep_ctx.
>
> My naive idea is just let xhci export one more function to expose xhci_ep_ctx.
> But I'm not sure whether this is acceptable:
I find that xhci_add_endpoint() ignores some errors with return 0, for
these cases we needn't call xhci_mtk_add_ep-quirk(), so may be not a
good way to just export xhci_add_endpoint().
>
> +struct xhci_ep_ctx* xhci_get_ep_contex(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct
> usb_host_endpoint *ep)
> +{ ... }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xhci_get_ep_context);
>
> But for v6, I'm going to submit a patch with {check|reset}_bandwidth()
> quirk function
> switched into xhci_driver_overrides first. (and preserve existing
> MTK_HOST quirk functions).
>
> Thanks!
>
> > -Mathias
> >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
To: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
Cc: Zhanyong Wang <zhanyong.wang@mediatek.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tianping Fang <tianping.fang@mediatek.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] usb: xhci-mtk: fix unreleased bandwidth data
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:29:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1610612988.30053.15.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAATdQgD2OAmf7_NWSVwzyJE7mF0vngzE=QeE79PS7MJsgPhbtA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ikjoon,
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 13:48 +0800, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:44 PM Mathias Nyman
> <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 8.1.2021 8.11, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 13:09 +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> > >> On 29.12.2020 8.24, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
> > >>> xhci-mtk has hooks on add_endpoint() and drop_endpoint() from xhci
> > >>> to handle its own sw bandwidth managements and stores bandwidth data
> > >>> into internal table every time add_endpoint() is called,
> > >>> so when bandwidth allocation fails at one endpoint, all earlier
> > >>> allocation from the same interface could still remain at the table.
> > >>>
> > >>> This patch adds two more hooks from check_bandwidth() and
> > >>> reset_bandwidth(), and make mtk-xhci to releases all failed endpoints
> > >>> from reset_bandwidth().
> > >>>
> > >>> Fixes: 08e469de87a2 ("usb: xhci-mtk: supports bandwidth scheduling with multi-TT")
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> ...
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> > >>> index d4a8d0efbbc4..e1fcd3cf723f 100644
> > >>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> > >>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> > >>> @@ -2882,6 +2882,12 @@ static int xhci_check_bandwidth(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev)
> > >>> xhci_dbg(xhci, "%s called for udev %p\n", __func__, udev);
> > >>> virt_dev = xhci->devs[udev->slot_id];
> > >>>
> > >>> + if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_MTK_HOST) {
> > >>> + ret = xhci_mtk_check_bandwidth(hcd, udev);
> > >>> + if (ret < 0)
> > >>> + return ret;
> > >>> + }
> > >>> +
> > >>
> > >> Just noticed that XHCI_MTK_HOST quirk is only set in xhci-mtk.c.
> > >> xhci-mtk.c calls xhci_init_driver(..., xhci_mtk_overrides) with a .reset override function.
> > >>
> > >> why not add override functions for .check_bandwidth and .reset_bandwidth to xhci_mtk_overrides instead?
> > >>
> > >> Another patch to add similar overrides for .add_endpoint and .drop_endpoint should probably be
> > >> done so that we can get rid of the xhci_mtk_add/drop_ep_quirk() calls in xhci.c as well
> > > You mean, we can export xhci_add/drop_endpoint()?
> >
> > I think so, unless you have a better idea.
> > I prefer exporting the generic add/drop_endpoint functions rather than the vendor specific quirk functions.
> >
>
> When moving out all MTK_HOST quirks and unlink xhci-mtk-sch from xhci,
> xhci-mtk-sch still needs to touch the xhci internals, at least struct
> xhci_ep_ctx.
>
> My naive idea is just let xhci export one more function to expose xhci_ep_ctx.
> But I'm not sure whether this is acceptable:
I find that xhci_add_endpoint() ignores some errors with return 0, for
these cases we needn't call xhci_mtk_add_ep-quirk(), so may be not a
good way to just export xhci_add_endpoint().
>
> +struct xhci_ep_ctx* xhci_get_ep_contex(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct
> usb_host_endpoint *ep)
> +{ ... }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xhci_get_ep_context);
>
> But for v6, I'm going to submit a patch with {check|reset}_bandwidth()
> quirk function
> switched into xhci_driver_overrides first. (and preserve existing
> MTK_HOST quirk functions).
>
> Thanks!
>
> > -Mathias
> >
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-29 6:24 [PATCH v5] usb: xhci-mtk: fix unreleased bandwidth data Ikjoon Jang
2020-12-29 6:24 ` Ikjoon Jang
2020-12-29 6:24 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-01-07 11:09 ` Mathias Nyman
2021-01-07 11:09 ` Mathias Nyman
2021-01-07 11:09 ` Mathias Nyman
2021-01-08 2:56 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-01-08 2:56 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-01-08 2:56 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-01-08 6:11 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-08 6:11 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-08 6:11 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-08 14:46 ` Mathias Nyman
2021-01-08 14:46 ` Mathias Nyman
2021-01-08 14:46 ` Mathias Nyman
2021-01-12 5:48 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-01-12 5:48 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-01-12 5:48 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-01-14 2:23 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-14 2:23 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-14 2:23 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-14 8:29 ` Chunfeng Yun [this message]
2021-01-14 8:29 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-14 8:29 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-15 2:51 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-01-15 2:51 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-01-15 2:51 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-01-19 2:33 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-19 2:33 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-19 2:33 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-08 6:34 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-08 6:34 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-08 6:34 ` Chunfeng Yun
2021-01-08 10:50 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-01-08 10:50 ` Ikjoon Jang
2021-01-08 10:50 ` Ikjoon Jang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1610612988.30053.15.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
--to=chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ikjn@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=tianping.fang@mediatek.com \
--cc=zhanyong.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.