All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, ardb@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, frowand.list@gmail.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, guohanjun@huawei.com, guro@fb.com,
	jingxiangfeng@huawei.com, lenb@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	nsaenzjulienne@suse.de, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	paul.walmsley@sifive.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	robh@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	will@kernel.org
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 16:25:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <161513074613785@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210303073319.2215839-5-jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()

to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     of-unittest-add-test-for-of_dma_get_max_cpu_address.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


From foo@baz Sun Mar  7 04:22:37 PM CET 2021
From: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:33:16 +0800
Subject: of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()
To: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>, <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>, <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <rppt@kernel.org>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <guohanjun@huawei.com>, <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <lenb@kernel.org>, <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>, <ardb@kernel.org>, <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>, <guro@fb.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <frowand.list@gmail.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>, <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Message-ID: <20210303073319.2215839-5-jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>

From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>

commit 07d13a1d6120d453c3c1f020578693d072deded5 upstream

Introduce a test for of_dma_get_max_cup_address(), it uses the same DT
data as the rest of dma-ranges unit tests.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119175400.9995-5-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/of/unittest.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -869,6 +869,23 @@ static void __init of_unittest_changeset
 #endif
 }
 
+static void __init of_unittest_dma_get_max_cpu_address(void)
+{
+	struct device_node *np;
+	phys_addr_t cpu_addr;
+
+	np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/address-tests");
+	if (!np) {
+		pr_err("missing testcase data\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	cpu_addr = of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(np);
+	unittest(cpu_addr == 0x4fffffff,
+		 "of_dma_get_max_cpu_address: wrong CPU addr %pad (expecting %x)\n",
+		 &cpu_addr, 0x4fffffff);
+}
+
 static void __init of_unittest_dma_ranges_one(const char *path,
 		u64 expect_dma_addr, u64 expect_paddr)
 {
@@ -3266,6 +3283,7 @@ static int __init of_unittest(void)
 	of_unittest_changeset();
 	of_unittest_parse_interrupts();
 	of_unittest_parse_interrupts_extended();
+	of_unittest_dma_get_max_cpu_address();
 	of_unittest_parse_dma_ranges();
 	of_unittest_pci_dma_ranges();
 	of_unittest_match_node();


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jingxiangfeng@huawei.com are

queue-5.10/of-unittest-add-test-for-of_dma_get_max_cpu_address.patch
queue-5.10/mm-remove-examples-from-enum-zone_type-comment.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-set-zone_dma-size-based-on-devicetree-s-dma-ranges.patch
queue-5.10/of-address-introduce-of_dma_get_max_cpu_address.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-move-zone_dma_bits-initialization-into-zone_sizes_init.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-set-zone_dma-size-based-on-early-iort-scan.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-move-reserve_crashkernel-into-mem_init.patch

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, ardb@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, frowand.list@gmail.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, guohanjun@huawei.com, guro@fb.com,
	jingxiangfeng@huawei.com, lenb@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	nsaenzjulienne@suse.de, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	paul.walmsley@sifive.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	robh@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	will@kernel.org
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 16:25:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <161513074613785@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210303073319.2215839-5-jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()

to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     of-unittest-add-test-for-of_dma_get_max_cpu_address.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


From foo@baz Sun Mar  7 04:22:37 PM CET 2021
From: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:33:16 +0800
Subject: of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()
To: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>, <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>, <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <rppt@kernel.org>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <guohanjun@huawei.com>, <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <lenb@kernel.org>, <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>, <ardb@kernel.org>, <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>, <guro@fb.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <frowand.list@gmail.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>, <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Message-ID: <20210303073319.2215839-5-jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>

From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>

commit 07d13a1d6120d453c3c1f020578693d072deded5 upstream

Introduce a test for of_dma_get_max_cup_address(), it uses the same DT
data as the rest of dma-ranges unit tests.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119175400.9995-5-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/of/unittest.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -869,6 +869,23 @@ static void __init of_unittest_changeset
 #endif
 }
 
+static void __init of_unittest_dma_get_max_cpu_address(void)
+{
+	struct device_node *np;
+	phys_addr_t cpu_addr;
+
+	np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/address-tests");
+	if (!np) {
+		pr_err("missing testcase data\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	cpu_addr = of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(np);
+	unittest(cpu_addr == 0x4fffffff,
+		 "of_dma_get_max_cpu_address: wrong CPU addr %pad (expecting %x)\n",
+		 &cpu_addr, 0x4fffffff);
+}
+
 static void __init of_unittest_dma_ranges_one(const char *path,
 		u64 expect_dma_addr, u64 expect_paddr)
 {
@@ -3266,6 +3283,7 @@ static int __init of_unittest(void)
 	of_unittest_changeset();
 	of_unittest_parse_interrupts();
 	of_unittest_parse_interrupts_extended();
+	of_unittest_dma_get_max_cpu_address();
 	of_unittest_parse_dma_ranges();
 	of_unittest_pci_dma_ranges();
 	of_unittest_match_node();


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jingxiangfeng@huawei.com are

queue-5.10/of-unittest-add-test-for-of_dma_get_max_cpu_address.patch
queue-5.10/mm-remove-examples-from-enum-zone_type-comment.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-set-zone_dma-size-based-on-devicetree-s-dma-ranges.patch
queue-5.10/of-address-introduce-of_dma_get_max_cpu_address.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-move-zone_dma_bits-initialization-into-zone_sizes_init.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-set-zone_dma-size-based-on-early-iort-scan.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-move-reserve_crashkernel-into-mem_init.patch

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org,anshuman.khandual@arm.com,aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,ardb@kernel.org,bhelgaas@google.com,catalin.marinas@arm.com,frowand.list@gmail.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,guohanjun@huawei.com,guro@fb.com,jingxiangfeng@huawei.com,lenb@kernel.org,linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,linux-mm@kvack.org,linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,nsaenzjulienne@suse.de,palmer@dabbelt.com,paul.walmsley@sifive.com,rjw@rjwysocki.net,robh+dt@kernel.org,robh@kernel.org,rppt@kernel.org,song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com,sudeep.holla@arm.com,wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,will@kernel.org
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 16:25:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <161513074613785@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210303073319.2215839-5-jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()

to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     of-unittest-add-test-for-of_dma_get_max_cpu_address.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


From foo@baz Sun Mar  7 04:22:37 PM CET 2021
From: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:33:16 +0800
Subject: of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()
To: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>, <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>, <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <rppt@kernel.org>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <guohanjun@huawei.com>, <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <lenb@kernel.org>, <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>, <ardb@kernel.org>, <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>, <guro@fb.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <frowand.list@gmail.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>, <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Message-ID: <20210303073319.2215839-5-jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>

From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>

commit 07d13a1d6120d453c3c1f020578693d072deded5 upstream

Introduce a test for of_dma_get_max_cup_address(), it uses the same DT
data as the rest of dma-ranges unit tests.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119175400.9995-5-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/of/unittest.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -869,6 +869,23 @@ static void __init of_unittest_changeset
 #endif
 }
 
+static void __init of_unittest_dma_get_max_cpu_address(void)
+{
+	struct device_node *np;
+	phys_addr_t cpu_addr;
+
+	np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/address-tests");
+	if (!np) {
+		pr_err("missing testcase data\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	cpu_addr = of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(np);
+	unittest(cpu_addr == 0x4fffffff,
+		 "of_dma_get_max_cpu_address: wrong CPU addr %pad (expecting %x)\n",
+		 &cpu_addr, 0x4fffffff);
+}
+
 static void __init of_unittest_dma_ranges_one(const char *path,
 		u64 expect_dma_addr, u64 expect_paddr)
 {
@@ -3266,6 +3283,7 @@ static int __init of_unittest(void)
 	of_unittest_changeset();
 	of_unittest_parse_interrupts();
 	of_unittest_parse_interrupts_extended();
+	of_unittest_dma_get_max_cpu_address();
 	of_unittest_parse_dma_ranges();
 	of_unittest_pci_dma_ranges();
 	of_unittest_match_node();


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jingxiangfeng@huawei.com are

queue-5.10/of-unittest-add-test-for-of_dma_get_max_cpu_address.patch
queue-5.10/mm-remove-examples-from-enum-zone_type-comment.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-set-zone_dma-size-based-on-devicetree-s-dma-ranges.patch
queue-5.10/of-address-introduce-of_dma_get_max_cpu_address.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-move-zone_dma_bits-initialization-into-zone_sizes_init.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-set-zone_dma-size-based-on-early-iort-scan.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-mm-move-reserve_crashkernel-into-mem_init.patch


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-07 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-03  7:33 [PATCH stable v5.10 0/7] arm64: Default to 32-bit wide ZONE_DMA Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33 ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33 ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33 ` [PATCH stable v5.10 1/7] arm64: mm: Move reserve_crashkernel() into mem_init() Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33   ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33   ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-07 15:25   ` Patch "arm64: mm: Move reserve_crashkernel() into mem_init()" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2021-03-07 15:25     ` gregkh
2021-03-07 15:25     ` gregkh
2021-03-03  7:33 ` [PATCH stable v5.10 2/7] arm64: mm: Move zone_dma_bits initialization into zone_sizes_init() Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33   ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33   ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-07 15:25   ` Patch "arm64: mm: Move zone_dma_bits initialization into zone_sizes_init()" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2021-03-07 15:25     ` gregkh
2021-03-07 15:25     ` gregkh
2021-03-03  7:33 ` [PATCH stable v5.10 3/7] of/address: Introduce of_dma_get_max_cpu_address() Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33   ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33   ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-07 15:25   ` Patch "of/address: Introduce of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2021-03-07 15:25     ` gregkh
2021-03-07 15:25     ` gregkh
2021-03-03  7:33 ` [PATCH stable v5.10 4/7] of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address() Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33   ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33   ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-07 15:25   ` gregkh [this message]
2021-03-07 15:25     ` Patch "of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2021-03-07 15:25     ` gregkh
2021-03-03  7:33 ` [PATCH stable v5.10 5/7] arm64: mm: Set ZONE_DMA size based on devicetree's dma-ranges Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33   ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33   ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-07 15:25   ` Patch "arm64: mm: Set ZONE_DMA size based on devicetree's dma-ranges" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2021-03-07 15:25     ` gregkh
2021-03-07 15:25     ` gregkh
2021-03-03  7:33 ` [PATCH stable v5.10 6/7] arm64: mm: Set ZONE_DMA size based on early IORT scan Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33   ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33   ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-07 15:25   ` Patch "arm64: mm: Set ZONE_DMA size based on early IORT scan" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2021-03-07 15:25     ` gregkh
2021-03-07 15:25     ` gregkh
2021-03-03  7:33 ` [PATCH stable v5.10 7/7] mm: Remove examples from enum zone_type comment Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33   ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-03  7:33   ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-07 15:25   ` Patch "mm: Remove examples from enum zone_type comment" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2021-03-07 15:25     ` gregkh
2021-03-07 15:25     ` gregkh
2021-03-04 13:46 ` [PATCH stable v5.10 0/7] arm64: Default to 32-bit wide ZONE_DMA Greg KH
2021-03-04 13:46   ` Greg KH
2021-03-04 13:46   ` Greg KH
2021-03-04 14:05   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-03-04 14:05     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-03-04 14:05     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-03-04 14:17     ` Greg KH
2021-03-04 14:17       ` Greg KH
2021-03-04 14:17       ` Greg KH
2021-03-04 15:09       ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-03-04 15:09         ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-03-04 15:09         ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-03-07 15:24         ` Greg KH
2021-03-07 15:24           ` Greg KH
2021-03-07 15:24           ` Greg KH
2021-03-08  3:20           ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-08  3:20             ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-08  3:20             ` Jing Xiangfeng
2021-03-08  9:58             ` Greg KH
2021-03-08  9:58               ` Greg KH
2021-03-08  9:58               ` Greg KH
2021-05-11 12:35               ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-11 12:35                 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-11 12:35                 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12 12:06                 ` Greg KH
2021-05-12 12:06                   ` Greg KH
2021-05-12 12:06                   ` Greg KH
2021-06-23  6:59                 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-06-23  6:59                   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-06-23  7:12                   ` Greg KH
2021-06-23  7:12                     ` Greg KH
2021-06-23  7:25                     ` Kefeng Wang
2021-06-23  7:25                       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-06-23  7:34                       ` Greg KH
2021-06-23  7:34                         ` Greg KH
2021-06-23  8:01                         ` Kefeng Wang
2021-06-23  8:01                           ` Kefeng Wang
2021-06-25 10:19                           ` Greg KH
2021-06-25 10:19                             ` Greg KH
2021-06-26  1:19                             ` Kefeng Wang
2021-06-26  1:19                               ` Kefeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=161513074613785@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=jingxiangfeng@huawei.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.