From: guoren@kernel.org
To: guoren@kernel.org
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: [PATCH v6 4/9] csky: locks: Optimize coding convention
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:30:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1617201040-83905-5-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617201040-83905-1-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org>
From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
- Using smp_cond_load_acquire in arch_spin_lock by Peter's
advice.
- Using __smp_acquire_fence in arch_spin_trylock
- Using smp_store_release in arch_spin_unlock
All above are just coding conventions and won't affect the
function.
TODO in smp_cond_load_acquire for architecture:
- current csky only has:
lr.w val, <p0>
sc.w <p0>. val2
(Any other stores to p0 will let sc.w failed)
- But smp_cond_load_acquire need:
lr.w val, <p0>
wfe
(Any stores to p0 will send the event to let wfe retired)
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAAhSdy1JHLUFwu7RuCaQ+RUWRBks2KsDva7EpRt8--4ZfofSUQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#m13adac285b7f51f4f879a5d6b65753ecb1a7524e
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
index 69f5aa249c5f..69677167977a 100644
--- a/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -26,10 +26,8 @@ static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
: "r"(p), "r"(ticket_next)
: "cc");
- while (lockval.tickets.next != lockval.tickets.owner)
- lockval.tickets.owner = READ_ONCE(lock->tickets.owner);
-
- smp_mb();
+ smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->tickets.owner,
+ VAL == lockval.tickets.next);
}
static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
@@ -55,15 +53,14 @@ static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
} while (!res);
if (!contended)
- smp_mb();
+ __smp_acquire_fence();
return !contended;
}
static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
- smp_mb();
- WRITE_ONCE(lock->tickets.owner, lock->tickets.owner + 1);
+ smp_store_release(&lock->tickets.owner, lock->tickets.owner + 1);
}
static inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
--
2.17.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: guoren@kernel.org
To: guoren@kernel.org
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: [PATCH v6 4/9] csky: locks: Optimize coding convention
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:30:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1617201040-83905-5-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617201040-83905-1-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org>
From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
- Using smp_cond_load_acquire in arch_spin_lock by Peter's
advice.
- Using __smp_acquire_fence in arch_spin_trylock
- Using smp_store_release in arch_spin_unlock
All above are just coding conventions and won't affect the
function.
TODO in smp_cond_load_acquire for architecture:
- current csky only has:
lr.w val, <p0>
sc.w <p0>. val2
(Any other stores to p0 will let sc.w failed)
- But smp_cond_load_acquire need:
lr.w val, <p0>
wfe
(Any stores to p0 will send the event to let wfe retired)
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAAhSdy1JHLUFwu7RuCaQ+RUWRBks2KsDva7EpRt8--4ZfofSUQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#m13adac285b7f51f4f879a5d6b65753ecb1a7524e
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
index 69f5aa249c5f..69677167977a 100644
--- a/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -26,10 +26,8 @@ static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
: "r"(p), "r"(ticket_next)
: "cc");
- while (lockval.tickets.next != lockval.tickets.owner)
- lockval.tickets.owner = READ_ONCE(lock->tickets.owner);
-
- smp_mb();
+ smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->tickets.owner,
+ VAL == lockval.tickets.next);
}
static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
@@ -55,15 +53,14 @@ static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
} while (!res);
if (!contended)
- smp_mb();
+ __smp_acquire_fence();
return !contended;
}
static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
- smp_mb();
- WRITE_ONCE(lock->tickets.owner, lock->tickets.owner + 1);
+ smp_store_release(&lock->tickets.owner, lock->tickets.owner + 1);
}
static inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: guoren@kernel.org <guoren@kernel.org>
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH v6 4/9] csky: locks: Optimize coding convention
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:30:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1617201040-83905-5-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617201040-83905-1-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org>
From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
- Using smp_cond_load_acquire in arch_spin_lock by Peter's
advice.
- Using __smp_acquire_fence in arch_spin_trylock
- Using smp_store_release in arch_spin_unlock
All above are just coding conventions and won't affect the
function.
TODO in smp_cond_load_acquire for architecture:
- current csky only has:
lr.w val, <p0>
sc.w <p0>. val2
(Any other stores to p0 will let sc.w failed)
- But smp_cond_load_acquire need:
lr.w val, <p0>
wfe
(Any stores to p0 will send the event to let wfe retired)
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAAhSdy1JHLUFwu7RuCaQ+RUWRBks2KsDva7EpRt8--4ZfofSUQ at mail.gmail.com/T/#m13adac285b7f51f4f879a5d6b65753ecb1a7524e
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
index 69f5aa249c5f..69677167977a 100644
--- a/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -26,10 +26,8 @@ static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
: "r"(p), "r"(ticket_next)
: "cc");
- while (lockval.tickets.next != lockval.tickets.owner)
- lockval.tickets.owner = READ_ONCE(lock->tickets.owner);
-
- smp_mb();
+ smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->tickets.owner,
+ VAL == lockval.tickets.next);
}
static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
@@ -55,15 +53,14 @@ static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
} while (!res);
if (!contended)
- smp_mb();
+ __smp_acquire_fence();
return !contended;
}
static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
- smp_mb();
- WRITE_ONCE(lock->tickets.owner, lock->tickets.owner + 1);
+ smp_store_release(&lock->tickets.owner, lock->tickets.owner + 1);
}
static inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
--
2.17.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: guoren@kernel.org
To: guoren@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 4/9] csky: locks: Optimize coding convention
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:30:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1617201040-83905-5-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617201040-83905-1-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org>
From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
- Using smp_cond_load_acquire in arch_spin_lock by Peter's
advice.
- Using __smp_acquire_fence in arch_spin_trylock
- Using smp_store_release in arch_spin_unlock
All above are just coding conventions and won't affect the
function.
TODO in smp_cond_load_acquire for architecture:
- current csky only has:
lr.w val, <p0>
sc.w <p0>. val2
(Any other stores to p0 will let sc.w failed)
- But smp_cond_load_acquire need:
lr.w val, <p0>
wfe
(Any stores to p0 will send the event to let wfe retired)
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAAhSdy1JHLUFwu7RuCaQ+RUWRBks2KsDva7EpRt8--4ZfofSUQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#m13adac285b7f51f4f879a5d6b65753ecb1a7524e
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
index 69f5aa249c5f..69677167977a 100644
--- a/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -26,10 +26,8 @@ static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
: "r"(p), "r"(ticket_next)
: "cc");
- while (lockval.tickets.next != lockval.tickets.owner)
- lockval.tickets.owner = READ_ONCE(lock->tickets.owner);
-
- smp_mb();
+ smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->tickets.owner,
+ VAL == lockval.tickets.next);
}
static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
@@ -55,15 +53,14 @@ static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
} while (!res);
if (!contended)
- smp_mb();
+ __smp_acquire_fence();
return !contended;
}
static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
- smp_mb();
- WRITE_ONCE(lock->tickets.owner, lock->tickets.owner + 1);
+ smp_store_release(&lock->tickets.owner, lock->tickets.owner + 1);
}
static inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-31 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-31 14:30 [PATCH v6 0/9] riscv: Add qspinlock/qrwlock guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [OpenRISC] " guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] locking/qspinlock: Add ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS_XCHG32 guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [OpenRISC] " guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-04-06 16:51 ` Boqun Feng
2021-04-06 16:51 ` Boqun Feng
2021-04-06 16:51 ` [OpenRISC] " Boqun Feng
2021-04-06 16:51 ` Boqun Feng
2021-04-06 23:52 ` [OpenRISC] " Stafford Horne
2021-04-06 23:52 ` Stafford Horne
2021-04-06 23:52 ` Stafford Horne
2021-04-06 23:52 ` Stafford Horne
2021-04-07 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-07 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-07 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-07 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-07 20:12 ` Stafford Horne
2021-04-07 20:12 ` Stafford Horne
2021-04-07 20:12 ` Stafford Horne
2021-04-07 20:12 ` Stafford Horne
2021-04-08 19:00 ` Waiman Long
2021-04-08 19:00 ` Waiman Long
2021-04-08 19:00 ` Waiman Long
2021-04-08 19:00 ` Waiman Long
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] riscv: Convert custom spinlock/rwlock to generic qspinlock/qrwlock guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [OpenRISC] " guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] riscv: locks: Introduce ticket-based spinlock implementation guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [OpenRISC] " guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-04-05 5:54 ` Guo Ren
2021-04-05 5:54 ` Guo Ren
2021-04-05 5:54 ` [OpenRISC] " Guo Ren
2021-04-05 5:54 ` Guo Ren
2021-04-11 16:02 ` Guo Ren
2021-04-11 16:02 ` Guo Ren
2021-04-11 16:02 ` [OpenRISC] " Guo Ren
2021-04-11 16:02 ` Guo Ren
2021-04-11 16:51 ` Guo Ren
2021-04-11 16:51 ` Guo Ren
2021-04-11 16:51 ` [OpenRISC] " Guo Ren
2021-04-11 16:51 ` Guo Ren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren [this message]
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] csky: locks: Optimize coding convention guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [OpenRISC] " guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-04-11 16:01 ` Guo Ren
2021-04-11 16:01 ` Guo Ren
2021-04-11 16:01 ` [OpenRISC] " Guo Ren
2021-04-11 16:01 ` Guo Ren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] csky: Convert custom spinlock/rwlock to generic qspinlock/qrwlock guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [OpenRISC] " guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] openrisc: qspinlock: Add ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS_XCHG32 guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [OpenRISC] " guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-04-06 8:56 ` Stafford Horne
2021-04-06 8:56 ` Stafford Horne
2021-04-06 8:56 ` [OpenRISC] " Stafford Horne
2021-04-06 8:56 ` Stafford Horne
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] sparc: " guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [OpenRISC] " guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] xtensa: " guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [OpenRISC] " guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] powerpc/qspinlock: " guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` [OpenRISC] " guoren
2021-03-31 14:30 ` guoren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1617201040-83905-5-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org \
--to=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.