From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
heiko@sntech.de, linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
yifeng zhao <yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mtd: rawnand: rockchip-nand-controller: add skipbbt option
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:17:15 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1618382560.2326931.1689261435022.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230712154142.3c49d782@xps-13>
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>
>> > For the boot I think I proposed a DT property. I don't remember how far
>> > the discussion went.
>>
>> Is there a web link of that discussion?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20230609104426.3901df54@xps-13/
>
> Maybe the term "DT property" did not appear but that's what I had in
> mind :-) I don't know if it must be a chip or a partition property.
>
> Richard, here is where I would like your feedback, I am kind of opposed
> to a "skip_bbt" module parameter. It's not a strong opinion, if you
> think it's fine I'm open.
>
> I would rather prefer a DT property which says "do not use the
> standard pattern".
Yes, please no new module parameters. A module parameter should only affect
the behavior of the driver itself (e.g. debug mode) but not be device specific.
We made this mistake in the past too often. :-(
A single driver can serve more devices. Therefore IMHO controlling this via DT
makes perfectly sense.
Thanks,
//richard
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
heiko@sntech.de, linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
yifeng zhao <yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mtd: rawnand: rockchip-nand-controller: add skipbbt option
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:17:15 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1618382560.2326931.1689261435022.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230712154142.3c49d782@xps-13>
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>
>> > For the boot I think I proposed a DT property. I don't remember how far
>> > the discussion went.
>>
>> Is there a web link of that discussion?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20230609104426.3901df54@xps-13/
>
> Maybe the term "DT property" did not appear but that's what I had in
> mind :-) I don't know if it must be a chip or a partition property.
>
> Richard, here is where I would like your feedback, I am kind of opposed
> to a "skip_bbt" module parameter. It's not a strong opinion, if you
> think it's fine I'm open.
>
> I would rather prefer a DT property which says "do not use the
> standard pattern".
Yes, please no new module parameters. A module parameter should only affect
the behavior of the driver itself (e.g. debug mode) but not be device specific.
We made this mistake in the past too often. :-(
A single driver can serve more devices. Therefore IMHO controlling this via DT
makes perfectly sense.
Thanks,
//richard
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
heiko@sntech.de, linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
yifeng zhao <yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mtd: rawnand: rockchip-nand-controller: add skipbbt option
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:17:15 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1618382560.2326931.1689261435022.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230712154142.3c49d782@xps-13>
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>
>> > For the boot I think I proposed a DT property. I don't remember how far
>> > the discussion went.
>>
>> Is there a web link of that discussion?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20230609104426.3901df54@xps-13/
>
> Maybe the term "DT property" did not appear but that's what I had in
> mind :-) I don't know if it must be a chip or a partition property.
>
> Richard, here is where I would like your feedback, I am kind of opposed
> to a "skip_bbt" module parameter. It's not a strong opinion, if you
> think it's fine I'm open.
>
> I would rather prefer a DT property which says "do not use the
> standard pattern".
Yes, please no new module parameters. A module parameter should only affect
the behavior of the driver itself (e.g. debug mode) but not be device specific.
We made this mistake in the past too often. :-(
A single driver can serve more devices. Therefore IMHO controlling this via DT
makes perfectly sense.
Thanks,
//richard
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
heiko@sntech.de, linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
yifeng zhao <yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mtd: rawnand: rockchip-nand-controller: add skipbbt option
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:17:15 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1618382560.2326931.1689261435022.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230712154142.3c49d782@xps-13>
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>
>> > For the boot I think I proposed a DT property. I don't remember how far
>> > the discussion went.
>>
>> Is there a web link of that discussion?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20230609104426.3901df54@xps-13/
>
> Maybe the term "DT property" did not appear but that's what I had in
> mind :-) I don't know if it must be a chip or a partition property.
>
> Richard, here is where I would like your feedback, I am kind of opposed
> to a "skip_bbt" module parameter. It's not a strong opinion, if you
> think it's fine I'm open.
>
> I would rather prefer a DT property which says "do not use the
> standard pattern".
Yes, please no new module parameters. A module parameter should only affect
the behavior of the driver itself (e.g. debug mode) but not be device specific.
We made this mistake in the past too often. :-(
A single driver can serve more devices. Therefore IMHO controlling this via DT
makes perfectly sense.
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-13 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-15 17:32 [PATCH v3 0/3] Fixes for Rockchip NAND controller driver Johan Jonker
2023-06-15 17:32 ` Johan Jonker
2023-06-15 17:32 ` Johan Jonker
2023-06-15 17:32 ` Johan Jonker
2023-06-15 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mtd: rawnand: rockchip-nand-controller: fix oobfree offset and description Johan Jonker
2023-06-15 17:34 ` Johan Jonker
2023-06-15 17:34 ` Johan Jonker
2023-06-15 17:34 ` Johan Jonker
2023-07-04 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-04 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-04 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-04 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-06-15 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mtd: rawnand: rockchip-nand-controller: copy hwecc PA data to oob_poi buffer Johan Jonker
2023-06-15 17:34 ` Johan Jonker
2023-06-15 17:34 ` Johan Jonker
2023-06-15 17:34 ` Johan Jonker
2023-07-04 15:08 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-04 15:08 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-04 15:08 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-04 15:08 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-05 18:20 ` Johan Jonker
2023-07-05 18:20 ` Johan Jonker
2023-07-05 18:20 ` Johan Jonker
2023-07-05 18:20 ` Johan Jonker
2023-06-15 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mtd: rawnand: rockchip-nand-controller: add skipbbt option Johan Jonker
2023-06-15 17:34 ` Johan Jonker
2023-06-15 17:34 ` Johan Jonker
2023-06-15 17:34 ` Johan Jonker
2023-07-04 15:13 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-04 15:13 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-04 15:13 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-04 15:13 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-07 15:27 ` Johan Jonker
2023-07-07 15:27 ` Johan Jonker
2023-07-07 15:27 ` Johan Jonker
2023-07-07 15:27 ` Johan Jonker
2023-07-12 13:57 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-12 13:57 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-12 13:57 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-12 13:57 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-07-13 15:17 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2023-07-13 15:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2023-07-13 15:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2023-07-13 15:17 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1618382560.2326931.1689261435022.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jbx6244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.