From: Pavel Herrmann <morpheus.ibis@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3] MAX1111: Fix Race condition causing
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:04:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1628512.b7CSRB10BJ@bloomfield> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110712093606.5db834cb@endymion.delvare>
On Tuesday 12 of July 2011 09:36:06 Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:50:38 +0200, Pavel Herrmann wrote:
> > spi_sync call uses its spi_message parameter to keep completion
> > information, using a drvdata structure is not thread-safe, potentially
> > causing one thread having pointers to memory on or above other threads
> > stack. use mutex to prevent multiple access
>
> Honestly, I have no idea what "causing one thread having pointers to
> memory on or above other threads stack" means (nor why this would be
> bad.)
the long-winded story is that thread A writes a pointer onto its stack into
the drvdata as part of spi_sync call, then thread B comes in and puts a
pointer onto its stack into the drvdata, at the end of spi_sync thread A uses
this pointer (assuming it is unchanged), which is pointing either onto valid
stack of thread B or somewhere above it (if thread B already returned)
> Patch applied nevertheless, as it fixes an actual bug which should be
> fixed ASAP. Thanks for your contribution.
thanks
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: morpheus.ibis@gmail.com (Pavel Herrmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] MAX1111: Fix Race condition causing NULL pointer exception
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:04:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1628512.b7CSRB10BJ@bloomfield> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110712093606.5db834cb@endymion.delvare>
On Tuesday 12 of July 2011 09:36:06 Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:50:38 +0200, Pavel Herrmann wrote:
> > spi_sync call uses its spi_message parameter to keep completion
> > information, using a drvdata structure is not thread-safe, potentially
> > causing one thread having pointers to memory on or above other threads
> > stack. use mutex to prevent multiple access
>
> Honestly, I have no idea what "causing one thread having pointers to
> memory on or above other threads stack" means (nor why this would be
> bad.)
the long-winded story is that thread A writes a pointer onto its stack into
the drvdata as part of spi_sync call, then thread B comes in and puts a
pointer onto its stack into the drvdata, at the end of spi_sync thread A uses
this pointer (assuming it is unchanged), which is pointing either onto valid
stack of thread B or somewhere above it (if thread B already returned)
> Patch applied nevertheless, as it fixes an actual bug which should be
> fixed ASAP. Thanks for your contribution.
thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-12 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-11 21:50 [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3] MAX1111: Fix Race condition causing NULL Pavel Herrmann
2011-07-11 21:50 ` [PATCH v3] MAX1111: Fix Race condition causing NULL pointer exception Pavel Herrmann
2011-07-12 7:36 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3] MAX1111: Fix Race condition causing Jean Delvare
2011-07-12 7:36 ` [PATCH v3] MAX1111: Fix Race condition causing NULL pointer exception Jean Delvare
2011-07-12 8:04 ` Pavel Herrmann [this message]
2011-07-12 8:04 ` Pavel Herrmann
2011-07-12 8:22 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3] MAX1111: Fix Race condition Mark Brown
2011-07-12 8:22 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3] MAX1111: Fix Race condition causing NULL pointer exception Mark Brown
2011-07-12 8:40 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3] MAX1111: Fix Race condition causing Jean Delvare
2011-07-12 8:40 ` [PATCH v3] MAX1111: Fix Race condition causing NULL pointer exception Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1628512.b7CSRB10BJ@bloomfield \
--to=morpheus.ibis@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.