Re: [PATCH] doc: document the new devargs syntax

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>]

18/01/2018 08:35, Yuanhan Liu:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:34:08PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > So does it make sense to separate them logically? Perhaps as "device identifier"
> > and "device args".
> 
> Then I think it returns back to the old issue: how could we identify a
> port when the bus id (say BDF for PCI bus) is not enough for identifying
> a port? Such case could happen when a single NIC has 2 ports sharing
> the same BDF. It could also happen with the VF representors that will
> be introduced shortly.

Yes, the device matching syntax must include bus category, class category
and driver category. So any device can be identified in future.

But I think Ferruh is talking about separating device matching
(which is described in this proposal) and device settings
(which are usually mixed in -w and --vdev options).
I agree there are different things and may be separate.
They could share the same syntax (bus/class/driver) but be separate
with a semicolon:
	matching;settings