From: Dominic Sweetman <dom@mips.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: "Kevin D. Kissell" <KevinK@mips.com>,
S C <theansweriz42@hotmail.com>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: Strange, strange occurence
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:35:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16629.24775.778491.754688@arsenal.mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040713003317.GA26715@linux-mips.org>
Ralf Baechle (ralf@linux-mips.org) writes:
> > A truly safe and general I-cache flush routine should itself run
> > uncached...
It depends what you mean by general, and uncached is not the only
option. The spec says:
"The operation of the instruction is UNPREDICTABLE if the cache line
that contains the CACHE instruction is the target of an
invalidate..."
If you use hit-type cache operations in a kernel routine, then you're
safe. I can't envisage any circumstance in which Linux would try to
invalidate kernel mainline code locations from the I-cache (well, you
might be doing something fabulous with debugging the kernel, but
that's not normal and you'd hardly expect to be able to support such
an activity with standard cache management calls).
So this problem can only arise on index-type I-cache invalidation. I
claim that a running kernel on a MIPS CPU should only use index-type
invalidation when it is necessary to invalidate the entire I-cache.
(If you use index-type operations for a range which doesn't resolve to
"the whole cache" then that should be fixed).
That implies that a MIPS32-paranoid "invalidate-whole-I-cache" routine
should:
1. Identify which indexes might alias to cache lines
containing the routines's own 'cache invalidate' instruction(s),
and thus hit the problem. There won't be that many of them.
2. Arrange to skip those indexes when zapping the cache, then do
something weird to invalidate that handful of lines. You could
do that by running uncached, but you could also do it just by using
some auxiliary routine which is known to be more than a cache line
but much less than a whole I-cache span distant, so can't possibly
alias to the same thing...
This is fiddly, but not terribly difficult and should have a
negligible performance impact.
Does that make sense? Am I now, having named the solution,
responsible for figuring out a patch (yeuch, I never wanted to be a
kernel programmer again...).
--
Dominic Sweetman
MIPS Technologies
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-14 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-09 18:50 Strange, strange occurence S C
2004-07-10 7:33 ` Niels Sterrenburg
2004-07-10 10:04 ` Ralf Baechle
2004-07-12 15:16 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2004-07-12 15:16 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2004-07-13 0:33 ` Ralf Baechle
2004-07-13 7:49 ` Help with MOP network boot install on DECstation 5000/240 Collin Baillie
2004-07-13 8:03 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-07-14 6:57 ` Collin Baillie
2004-07-14 9:54 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-14 12:44 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-07-14 12:51 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-14 13:30 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-07-15 11:33 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-14 12:43 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-07-16 14:41 ` Collin Baillie
2004-07-16 15:04 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-07-16 15:13 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-16 15:08 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-16 16:31 ` Thiemo Seufer
2004-07-16 16:51 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-16 18:56 ` Thiemo Seufer
2004-07-13 15:31 ` Strange, strange occurence Kevin D. Kissell
2004-07-13 15:31 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2004-07-14 12:02 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-14 16:35 ` Dominic Sweetman [this message]
2004-07-14 17:45 ` Michael Uhler
2004-07-14 17:45 ` Michael Uhler
2004-07-15 1:34 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2004-07-15 1:53 ` Ralf Baechle
2004-07-16 12:24 ` Ralf Baechle
2004-07-16 16:05 ` Atsushi Nemoto
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-12 20:49 S C
2004-07-12 21:23 S C
2004-07-12 21:48 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2004-07-12 21:48 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2004-07-12 22:25 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2004-07-12 22:25 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2004-07-12 23:13 ` Ralf Baechle
2004-07-12 23:11 ` Ralf Baechle
2004-07-12 23:00 ` Ralf Baechle
2004-07-12 23:10 S C
2004-07-30 21:06 G H
2004-07-31 5:09 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16629.24775.778491.754688@arsenal.mips.com \
--to=dom@mips.com \
--cc=KevinK@mips.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=theansweriz42@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.