From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Cc: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v11 0/4] Microchip soft ip corePWM driver
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 21:52:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <166803072013.1609016.4163434263140050032.b4-ty@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221007113512.91501-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com>
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
On Fri, 7 Oct 2022 12:35:09 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Hey Uwe, all,
>
> ~6.0-rc1 has rolled around so here is the promised v8v9~.
> v11 is based on 6.0 stuff still & there will be a change to the dts
> patch in v6.1, but I did a test merge and there was nothing to resolve.
> I'll take the dts change myself just to be on the safe side.
>
> [...]
Applied to dt-for-next, thanks!
[1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: fix microchip corePWM's pwm-cells
https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/a62d196e8988
[2/4] riscv: dts: fix the icicle's #pwm-cells
https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/ac2bcd194cc5
Thanks,
Conor.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Cc: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v11 0/4] Microchip soft ip corePWM driver
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 21:52:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <166803072013.1609016.4163434263140050032.b4-ty@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221007113512.91501-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com>
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
On Fri, 7 Oct 2022 12:35:09 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Hey Uwe, all,
>
> ~6.0-rc1 has rolled around so here is the promised v8v9~.
> v11 is based on 6.0 stuff still & there will be a change to the dts
> patch in v6.1, but I did a test merge and there was nothing to resolve.
> I'll take the dts change myself just to be on the safe side.
>
> [...]
Applied to dt-for-next, thanks!
[1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: fix microchip corePWM's pwm-cells
https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/a62d196e8988
[2/4] riscv: dts: fix the icicle's #pwm-cells
https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/ac2bcd194cc5
Thanks,
Conor.
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-09 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-07 11:35 [PATCH v11 0/4] Microchip soft ip corePWM driver Conor Dooley
2022-10-07 11:35 ` Conor Dooley
2022-10-07 11:35 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: fix microchip corePWM's pwm-cells Conor Dooley
2022-10-07 11:35 ` Conor Dooley
2022-10-07 11:35 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] riscv: dts: fix the icicle's #pwm-cells Conor Dooley
2022-10-07 11:35 ` Conor Dooley
2022-10-07 11:35 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] pwm: add microchip soft ip corePWM driver Conor Dooley
2022-10-07 11:35 ` Conor Dooley
2022-11-08 15:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-11-08 15:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-11-08 18:32 ` Conor Dooley
2022-11-08 18:32 ` Conor Dooley
2022-10-07 11:35 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] MAINTAINERS: add pwm to PolarFire SoC entry Conor Dooley
2022-10-07 11:35 ` Conor Dooley
2022-11-09 9:35 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-11-09 9:35 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-11-09 10:47 ` Conor Dooley
2022-11-09 10:47 ` Conor Dooley
2022-11-09 21:52 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-11-09 21:52 ` (subset) [PATCH v11 0/4] Microchip soft ip corePWM driver Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=166803072013.1609016.4163434263140050032.b4-ty@microchip.com \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.