[PATCH -next V3 0/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup & Optimization

[PATCH -next V3 0/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup & Optimization

[guoren]

From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>

Patch 1 is the fixup patch should be merged into stable-tree.
Patch 2 is a continuous optimization for jump_label patch_text
atomicity.

Changes in V3:
 - Correct the typo C.JAL -> C.J (Thx Jessica)
 - Fixup compile error when CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C=n
 - Rebase on riscv for-next (20230127)

Changes in V2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221210100927.835145-3-guoren@kernel.org/

Changes in V1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220913094252.3555240-6-andy.chiu@sifive.com/

Andy Chiu (1):
  riscv: jump_label: Fixup unaligned arch_static_branch function

Guo Ren (1):
  riscv: jump_label: Optimize the code size with compressed instruction

 arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h | 14 ++++++++++++--
 arch/riscv/kernel/jump_label.c      | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.36.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

[PATCH -next V3 0/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup & Optimization

[guoren]

From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>

Patch 1 is the fixup patch should be merged into stable-tree.
Patch 2 is a continuous optimization for jump_label patch_text
atomicity.

Changes in V3:
 - Correct the typo C.JAL -> C.J (Thx Jessica)
 - Fixup compile error when CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C=n
 - Rebase on riscv for-next (20230127)

Changes in V2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221210100927.835145-3-guoren@kernel.org/

Changes in V1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220913094252.3555240-6-andy.chiu@sifive.com/

Andy Chiu (1):
  riscv: jump_label: Fixup unaligned arch_static_branch function

Guo Ren (1):
  riscv: jump_label: Optimize the code size with compressed instruction

 arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h | 14 ++++++++++++--
 arch/riscv/kernel/jump_label.c      | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.36.1

[PATCH -next V3 1/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup unaligned arch_static_branch function

[guoren]

From: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com>

Runtime code patching must be done at a naturally aligned address, or we
may execute on a partial instruction.

We have encountered problems traced back to static jump functions during
the test. We switched the tracer randomly for every 1~5 seconds on a
dual-core QEMU setup and found the kernel sucking at a static branch
where it jumps to itself.

The reason is that the static branch was 2-byte but not 4-byte aligned.
Then, the kernel would patch the instruction, either J or NOP, with two
half-word stores if the machine does not have efficient unaligned
accesses. Thus, moments exist where half of the NOP mixes with the other
half of the J when transitioning the branch. In our particular case, on
a little-endian machine, the upper half of the NOP was mixed with the
lower part of the J when enabling the branch, resulting in a jump that
jumped to itself. Conversely, it would result in a HINT instruction when
disabling the branch, but it might not be observable.

ARM64 does not have this problem since all instructions must be 4-byte
aligned.

Fixes: ebc00dde8a97 ("riscv: Add jump-label implementation")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220913094252.3555240-6-andy.chiu@sifive.com/
Signed-off-by: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
index 6d58bbb5da46..14a5ea8d8ef0 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch(struct static_key * const key,
 					       const bool branch)
 {
 	asm_volatile_goto(
+		"	.align		2			\n\t"
 		"	.option push				\n\t"
 		"	.option norelax				\n\t"
 		"	.option norvc				\n\t"
@@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key * const ke
 						    const bool branch)
 {
 	asm_volatile_goto(
+		"	.align		2			\n\t"
 		"	.option push				\n\t"
 		"	.option norelax				\n\t"
 		"	.option norvc				\n\t"
-- 
2.36.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

[PATCH -next V3 1/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup unaligned arch_static_branch function

[guoren]

From: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com>

Runtime code patching must be done at a naturally aligned address, or we
may execute on a partial instruction.

We have encountered problems traced back to static jump functions during
the test. We switched the tracer randomly for every 1~5 seconds on a
dual-core QEMU setup and found the kernel sucking at a static branch
where it jumps to itself.

The reason is that the static branch was 2-byte but not 4-byte aligned.
Then, the kernel would patch the instruction, either J or NOP, with two
half-word stores if the machine does not have efficient unaligned
accesses. Thus, moments exist where half of the NOP mixes with the other
half of the J when transitioning the branch. In our particular case, on
a little-endian machine, the upper half of the NOP was mixed with the
lower part of the J when enabling the branch, resulting in a jump that
jumped to itself. Conversely, it would result in a HINT instruction when
disabling the branch, but it might not be observable.

ARM64 does not have this problem since all instructions must be 4-byte
aligned.

Fixes: ebc00dde8a97 ("riscv: Add jump-label implementation")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220913094252.3555240-6-andy.chiu@sifive.com/
Signed-off-by: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
index 6d58bbb5da46..14a5ea8d8ef0 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch(struct static_key * const key,
 					       const bool branch)
 {
 	asm_volatile_goto(
+		"	.align		2			\n\t"
 		"	.option push				\n\t"
 		"	.option norelax				\n\t"
 		"	.option norvc				\n\t"
@@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key * const ke
 						    const bool branch)
 {
 	asm_volatile_goto(
+		"	.align		2			\n\t"
 		"	.option push				\n\t"
 		"	.option norelax				\n\t"
 		"	.option norvc				\n\t"
-- 
2.36.1

Re: [PATCH -next V3 1/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup unaligned arch_static_branch function

[Björn Töpel]

guoren@kernel.org writes:

> From: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com>
>
> Runtime code patching must be done at a naturally aligned address, or we
> may execute on a partial instruction.
>
> We have encountered problems traced back to static jump functions during
> the test. We switched the tracer randomly for every 1~5 seconds on a
> dual-core QEMU setup and found the kernel sucking at a static branch
> where it jumps to itself.
>
> The reason is that the static branch was 2-byte but not 4-byte aligned.
> Then, the kernel would patch the instruction, either J or NOP, with two
> half-word stores if the machine does not have efficient unaligned
> accesses. Thus, moments exist where half of the NOP mixes with the other
> half of the J when transitioning the branch. In our particular case, on
> a little-endian machine, the upper half of the NOP was mixed with the
> lower part of the J when enabling the branch, resulting in a jump that
> jumped to itself. Conversely, it would result in a HINT instruction when
> disabling the branch, but it might not be observable.
>
> ARM64 does not have this problem since all instructions must be 4-byte
> aligned.

Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>

Nice catch! And I guess this is an issue for kprobes as well, no?
I.e. in general replacing 32b insns with an ebreak. This is only valid
for natural aligned 32b insns?

@Guo I don't see the point of doing a series for this, and asking the
maintainers to "pick this patch to stable, and the other for
next". Isn't that just more work for the maintainers/reviewers?


Björn

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH -next V3 1/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup unaligned arch_static_branch function

[Björn Töpel]

guoren@kernel.org writes:

> From: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com>
>
> Runtime code patching must be done at a naturally aligned address, or we
> may execute on a partial instruction.
>
> We have encountered problems traced back to static jump functions during
> the test. We switched the tracer randomly for every 1~5 seconds on a
> dual-core QEMU setup and found the kernel sucking at a static branch
> where it jumps to itself.
>
> The reason is that the static branch was 2-byte but not 4-byte aligned.
> Then, the kernel would patch the instruction, either J or NOP, with two
> half-word stores if the machine does not have efficient unaligned
> accesses. Thus, moments exist where half of the NOP mixes with the other
> half of the J when transitioning the branch. In our particular case, on
> a little-endian machine, the upper half of the NOP was mixed with the
> lower part of the J when enabling the branch, resulting in a jump that
> jumped to itself. Conversely, it would result in a HINT instruction when
> disabling the branch, but it might not be observable.
>
> ARM64 does not have this problem since all instructions must be 4-byte
> aligned.

Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>

Nice catch! And I guess this is an issue for kprobes as well, no?
I.e. in general replacing 32b insns with an ebreak. This is only valid
for natural aligned 32b insns?

@Guo I don't see the point of doing a series for this, and asking the
maintainers to "pick this patch to stable, and the other for
next". Isn't that just more work for the maintainers/reviewers?


Björn

Re: [PATCH -next V3 1/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup unaligned arch_static_branch function

[Guo Ren]

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 7:57 PM Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> guoren@kernel.org writes:
>
> > From: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com>
> >
> > Runtime code patching must be done at a naturally aligned address, or we
> > may execute on a partial instruction.
> >
> > We have encountered problems traced back to static jump functions during
> > the test. We switched the tracer randomly for every 1~5 seconds on a
> > dual-core QEMU setup and found the kernel sucking at a static branch
> > where it jumps to itself.
> >
> > The reason is that the static branch was 2-byte but not 4-byte aligned.
> > Then, the kernel would patch the instruction, either J or NOP, with two
> > half-word stores if the machine does not have efficient unaligned
> > accesses. Thus, moments exist where half of the NOP mixes with the other
> > half of the J when transitioning the branch. In our particular case, on
> > a little-endian machine, the upper half of the NOP was mixed with the
> > lower part of the J when enabling the branch, resulting in a jump that
> > jumped to itself. Conversely, it would result in a HINT instruction when
> > disabling the branch, but it might not be observable.
> >
> > ARM64 does not have this problem since all instructions must be 4-byte
> > aligned.
>
> Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
>
> Nice catch! And I guess this is an issue for kprobes as well, no?
> I.e. in general replacing 32b insns with an ebreak. This is only valid
> for natural aligned 32b insns?
>
> @Guo I don't see the point of doing a series for this, and asking the
> maintainers to "pick this patch to stable, and the other for
> next". Isn't that just more work for the maintainers/reviewers?
If these two patches are separated, they are all fixup that issue and
competed with each other. Making my patch an optimization patch must
depend on it. That's why I put them in one series.

>
>
> Björn



-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH -next V3 1/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup unaligned arch_static_branch function

[Guo Ren]

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 7:57 PM Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> guoren@kernel.org writes:
>
> > From: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com>
> >
> > Runtime code patching must be done at a naturally aligned address, or we
> > may execute on a partial instruction.
> >
> > We have encountered problems traced back to static jump functions during
> > the test. We switched the tracer randomly for every 1~5 seconds on a
> > dual-core QEMU setup and found the kernel sucking at a static branch
> > where it jumps to itself.
> >
> > The reason is that the static branch was 2-byte but not 4-byte aligned.
> > Then, the kernel would patch the instruction, either J or NOP, with two
> > half-word stores if the machine does not have efficient unaligned
> > accesses. Thus, moments exist where half of the NOP mixes with the other
> > half of the J when transitioning the branch. In our particular case, on
> > a little-endian machine, the upper half of the NOP was mixed with the
> > lower part of the J when enabling the branch, resulting in a jump that
> > jumped to itself. Conversely, it would result in a HINT instruction when
> > disabling the branch, but it might not be observable.
> >
> > ARM64 does not have this problem since all instructions must be 4-byte
> > aligned.
>
> Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
>
> Nice catch! And I guess this is an issue for kprobes as well, no?
> I.e. in general replacing 32b insns with an ebreak. This is only valid
> for natural aligned 32b insns?
>
> @Guo I don't see the point of doing a series for this, and asking the
> maintainers to "pick this patch to stable, and the other for
> next". Isn't that just more work for the maintainers/reviewers?
If these two patches are separated, they are all fixup that issue and
competed with each other. Making my patch an optimization patch must
depend on it. That's why I put them in one series.

>
>
> Björn



-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

Re: [PATCH -next V3 1/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup unaligned arch_static_branch function

[Björn Töpel]

Trimming Cc.

Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> writes:

>> @Guo I don't see the point of doing a series for this, and asking the
>> maintainers to "pick this patch to stable, and the other for
>> next". Isn't that just more work for the maintainers/reviewers?
> If these two patches are separated, they are all fixup that issue and
> competed with each other. Making my patch an optimization patch must
> depend on it. That's why I put them in one series.

They are not depedent at all, and not "fixup". The first is a fix, and
should go into -fixes ASAP. The other patch is completely stand-alone,
and an optimization (maybe). If that go in, it's for -next.

Having them as separate patches, makes it easier for
reviewers/maintainers. Now, with your approach there's more work
(cognitive, and manual) for others.


Björn

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH -next V3 1/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup unaligned arch_static_branch function

[Guo Ren]

On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 4:09 PM Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Trimming Cc.
>
> Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> writes:
>
> >> @Guo I don't see the point of doing a series for this, and asking the
> >> maintainers to "pick this patch to stable, and the other for
> >> next". Isn't that just more work for the maintainers/reviewers?
> > If these two patches are separated, they are all fixup that issue and
> > competed with each other. Making my patch an optimization patch must
> > depend on it. That's why I put them in one series.
>
> They are not depedent at all, and not "fixup". The first is a fix, and
> should go into -fixes ASAP. The other patch is completely stand-alone,
> and an optimization (maybe). If that go in, it's for -next.
>
> Having them as separate patches, makes it easier for
> reviewers/maintainers. Now, with your approach there's more work
> (cognitive, and manual) for others.
Okay, I would separate them.

>
>
> Björn



-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

[PATCH -next V3 2/2] riscv: jump_label: Optimize the code size with compressed instruction

[guoren]

From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>

Reduce the size of the static branch instruction and prevent atomic
update problems when CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C=y. It also reduces the jump
range from 1MB to 4KB, but 4KB is enough for the current riscv
requirement.

Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h | 16 +++++++++++----
 arch/riscv/kernel/jump_label.c      | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
index 14a5ea8d8ef0..afc58c31d02b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
@@ -12,17 +12,23 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <asm/asm.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
+#define JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE 2
+#else
 #define JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE 4
+#endif
 
 static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch(struct static_key * const key,
 					       const bool branch)
 {
 	asm_volatile_goto(
-		"	.align		2			\n\t"
 		"	.option push				\n\t"
 		"	.option norelax				\n\t"
-		"	.option norvc				\n\t"
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
+		"1:	c.nop					\n\t"
+#else
 		"1:	nop					\n\t"
+#endif
 		"	.option pop				\n\t"
 		"	.pushsection	__jump_table, \"aw\"	\n\t"
 		"	.align		" RISCV_LGPTR "		\n\t"
@@ -40,11 +46,13 @@ static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key * const ke
 						    const bool branch)
 {
 	asm_volatile_goto(
-		"	.align		2			\n\t"
 		"	.option push				\n\t"
 		"	.option norelax				\n\t"
-		"	.option norvc				\n\t"
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
+		"1:	c.j		%l[label]		\n\t"
+#else
 		"1:	jal		zero, %l[label]		\n\t"
+#endif
 		"	.option pop				\n\t"
 		"	.pushsection	__jump_table, \"aw\"	\n\t"
 		"	.align		" RISCV_LGPTR "		\n\t"
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/jump_label.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/jump_label.c
index e6694759dbd0..08f42c49e3a0 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/jump_label.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/jump_label.c
@@ -11,26 +11,52 @@
 #include <asm/bug.h>
 #include <asm/patch.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
+#define RISCV_INSN_NOP 0x0001U
+#define RISCV_INSN_C_J 0xa001U
+#else
 #define RISCV_INSN_NOP 0x00000013U
 #define RISCV_INSN_JAL 0x0000006fU
+#endif
 
 void arch_jump_label_transform(struct jump_entry *entry,
 			       enum jump_label_type type)
 {
 	void *addr = (void *)jump_entry_code(entry);
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
+	u16 insn;
+#else
 	u32 insn;
+#endif
 
 	if (type == JUMP_LABEL_JMP) {
 		long offset = jump_entry_target(entry) - jump_entry_code(entry);
-
-		if (WARN_ON(offset & 1 || offset < -524288 || offset >= 524288))
+		if (WARN_ON(offset & 1 || offset < -2048 || offset >= 2048))
 			return;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
+		/*
+		 * 001 | imm[11|4|9:8|10|6|7|3:1|5] 01 - C.J
+		 */
+		insn = RISCV_INSN_C_J |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(5, 5)) >> (5 - 2)) |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(3, 1)) << (3 - 1)) |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(7, 7)) >> (7 - 6)) |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(6, 6)) << (7 - 6)) |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(10, 10)) >> (10 - 8)) |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(9, 8)) << (9 - 8)) |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(4, 4)) << (11 - 4)) |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(11, 11)) << (12 - 11));
+#else
+		/*
+		 * imm[20|10:1|11|19:12] | rd | 1101111 - JAL
+		 */
 		insn = RISCV_INSN_JAL |
 			(((u32)offset & GENMASK(19, 12)) << (12 - 12)) |
 			(((u32)offset & GENMASK(11, 11)) << (20 - 11)) |
 			(((u32)offset & GENMASK(10,  1)) << (21 -  1)) |
 			(((u32)offset & GENMASK(20, 20)) << (31 - 20));
+#endif
 	} else {
 		insn = RISCV_INSN_NOP;
 	}
-- 
2.36.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

[PATCH -next V3 2/2] riscv: jump_label: Optimize the code size with compressed instruction

[guoren]

From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>

Reduce the size of the static branch instruction and prevent atomic
update problems when CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C=y. It also reduces the jump
range from 1MB to 4KB, but 4KB is enough for the current riscv
requirement.

Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h | 16 +++++++++++----
 arch/riscv/kernel/jump_label.c      | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
index 14a5ea8d8ef0..afc58c31d02b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
@@ -12,17 +12,23 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <asm/asm.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
+#define JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE 2
+#else
 #define JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE 4
+#endif
 
 static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch(struct static_key * const key,
 					       const bool branch)
 {
 	asm_volatile_goto(
-		"	.align		2			\n\t"
 		"	.option push				\n\t"
 		"	.option norelax				\n\t"
-		"	.option norvc				\n\t"
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
+		"1:	c.nop					\n\t"
+#else
 		"1:	nop					\n\t"
+#endif
 		"	.option pop				\n\t"
 		"	.pushsection	__jump_table, \"aw\"	\n\t"
 		"	.align		" RISCV_LGPTR "		\n\t"
@@ -40,11 +46,13 @@ static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key * const ke
 						    const bool branch)
 {
 	asm_volatile_goto(
-		"	.align		2			\n\t"
 		"	.option push				\n\t"
 		"	.option norelax				\n\t"
-		"	.option norvc				\n\t"
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
+		"1:	c.j		%l[label]		\n\t"
+#else
 		"1:	jal		zero, %l[label]		\n\t"
+#endif
 		"	.option pop				\n\t"
 		"	.pushsection	__jump_table, \"aw\"	\n\t"
 		"	.align		" RISCV_LGPTR "		\n\t"
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/jump_label.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/jump_label.c
index e6694759dbd0..08f42c49e3a0 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/jump_label.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/jump_label.c
@@ -11,26 +11,52 @@
 #include <asm/bug.h>
 #include <asm/patch.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
+#define RISCV_INSN_NOP 0x0001U
+#define RISCV_INSN_C_J 0xa001U
+#else
 #define RISCV_INSN_NOP 0x00000013U
 #define RISCV_INSN_JAL 0x0000006fU
+#endif
 
 void arch_jump_label_transform(struct jump_entry *entry,
 			       enum jump_label_type type)
 {
 	void *addr = (void *)jump_entry_code(entry);
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
+	u16 insn;
+#else
 	u32 insn;
+#endif
 
 	if (type == JUMP_LABEL_JMP) {
 		long offset = jump_entry_target(entry) - jump_entry_code(entry);
-
-		if (WARN_ON(offset & 1 || offset < -524288 || offset >= 524288))
+		if (WARN_ON(offset & 1 || offset < -2048 || offset >= 2048))
 			return;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
+		/*
+		 * 001 | imm[11|4|9:8|10|6|7|3:1|5] 01 - C.J
+		 */
+		insn = RISCV_INSN_C_J |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(5, 5)) >> (5 - 2)) |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(3, 1)) << (3 - 1)) |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(7, 7)) >> (7 - 6)) |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(6, 6)) << (7 - 6)) |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(10, 10)) >> (10 - 8)) |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(9, 8)) << (9 - 8)) |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(4, 4)) << (11 - 4)) |
+			(((u16)offset & GENMASK(11, 11)) << (12 - 11));
+#else
+		/*
+		 * imm[20|10:1|11|19:12] | rd | 1101111 - JAL
+		 */
 		insn = RISCV_INSN_JAL |
 			(((u32)offset & GENMASK(19, 12)) << (12 - 12)) |
 			(((u32)offset & GENMASK(11, 11)) << (20 - 11)) |
 			(((u32)offset & GENMASK(10,  1)) << (21 -  1)) |
 			(((u32)offset & GENMASK(20, 20)) << (31 - 20));
+#endif
 	} else {
 		insn = RISCV_INSN_NOP;
 	}
-- 
2.36.1

Re: [PATCH -next V3 0/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup & Optimization

[patchwork-bot+linux-riscv]

Hello:

This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>:

On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 12:06:05 -0500 you wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> Patch 1 is the fixup patch should be merged into stable-tree.
> Patch 2 is a continuous optimization for jump_label patch_text
> atomicity.
> 
> Changes in V3:
>  - Correct the typo C.JAL -> C.J (Thx Jessica)
>  - Fixup compile error when CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C=n
>  - Rebase on riscv for-next (20230127)
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [-next,V3,1/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup unaligned arch_static_branch function
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/9ddfc3cd8060
  - [-next,V3,2/2] riscv: jump_label: Optimize the code size with compressed instruction
    (no matching commit)

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH -next V3 0/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup & Optimization

[patchwork-bot+linux-riscv]

Hello:

This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>:

On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 12:06:05 -0500 you wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> Patch 1 is the fixup patch should be merged into stable-tree.
> Patch 2 is a continuous optimization for jump_label patch_text
> atomicity.
> 
> Changes in V3:
>  - Correct the typo C.JAL -> C.J (Thx Jessica)
>  - Fixup compile error when CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C=n
>  - Rebase on riscv for-next (20230127)
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [-next,V3,1/2] riscv: jump_label: Fixup unaligned arch_static_branch function
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/9ddfc3cd8060
  - [-next,V3,2/2] riscv: jump_label: Optimize the code size with compressed instruction
    (no matching commit)

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html