All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Romain Perier <romain.perier@collabora.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>, Liang Chen <cl@rock-chips.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>,
	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Huibin Hong <huibin.hong@rock-chips.com>,
	David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>,
	Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com>,
	Jacob Chen <jacob-chen@iotwrt.com>,
	William Wu <william.wu@rock-chips.com>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Use SPDX-License-Identifier for rockchip devicetree files
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 12:19:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1700848.99AcjQORKy@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171215114427.32059-1-klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>

Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 12:44:25 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
> This patch series replaces all the license text in rockchip devicetree
> files text with a proper SPDX-License-Identifier.
> It follows the guidelines submitted[1] by Thomas Gleixner that are not
> yet merged.
> 
> These series also fixes the issue with contradicting statements in most
> licenses. The introduction text claims to be GPL or X11[2] but the
> following verbatim copy of the license is actually a MIT[3] license.
> The X11 license includes a advertise clause and trademark information
> related to the X Consortium. As these X Consortium specfic points are
> irrelevant for us we stick with the actuall license text.
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10091607/
> [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html
> [3] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html
> 
> 
> Klaus Goger (2):
>   arm64: dts: rockchip: use SPDX-License-Identifier
>   ARM: dts: rockchip: use SPDX-License-Identifier

This had now 6 months for anybody concerned about this change to speak
up - with no NACKs received, so I've applied both patches for 4.19

Heiko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Use SPDX-License-Identifier for rockchip devicetree files
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 12:19:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1700848.99AcjQORKy@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171215114427.32059-1-klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>

Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 12:44:25 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
> This patch series replaces all the license text in rockchip devicetree
> files text with a proper SPDX-License-Identifier.
> It follows the guidelines submitted[1] by Thomas Gleixner that are not
> yet merged.
> 
> These series also fixes the issue with contradicting statements in most
> licenses. The introduction text claims to be GPL or X11[2] but the
> following verbatim copy of the license is actually a MIT[3] license.
> The X11 license includes a advertise clause and trademark information
> related to the X Consortium. As these X Consortium specfic points are
> irrelevant for us we stick with the actuall license text.
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10091607/
> [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html
> [3] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html
> 
> 
> Klaus Goger (2):
>   arm64: dts: rockchip: use SPDX-License-Identifier
>   ARM: dts: rockchip: use SPDX-License-Identifier

This had now 6 months for anybody concerned about this change to speak
up - with no NACKs received, so I've applied both patches for 4.19

Heiko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Romain Perier <romain.perier@collabora.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>, Liang Chen <cl@rock-chips.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>,
	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Huibin Hong <huibin.hong@rock-chips.com>,
	David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>,
	Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com>,
	Jacob Chen <jacob-chen@iotwrt.com>,
	William Wu <william.wu@rock-chips.com>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Rocky Hao <rocky.hao@rock-chips.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Pierre-Hugues Husson <phh@phh.me>,
	Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>,
	Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
	Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
	Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>,
	Joseph Chen <chenjh@rock-chips.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Use SPDX-License-Identifier for rockchip devicetree files
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 12:19:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1700848.99AcjQORKy@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171215114427.32059-1-klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>

Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 12:44:25 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
> This patch series replaces all the license text in rockchip devicetree
> files text with a proper SPDX-License-Identifier.
> It follows the guidelines submitted[1] by Thomas Gleixner that are not
> yet merged.
> 
> These series also fixes the issue with contradicting statements in most
> licenses. The introduction text claims to be GPL or X11[2] but the
> following verbatim copy of the license is actually a MIT[3] license.
> The X11 license includes a advertise clause and trademark information
> related to the X Consortium. As these X Consortium specfic points are
> irrelevant for us we stick with the actuall license text.
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10091607/
> [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html
> [3] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html
> 
> 
> Klaus Goger (2):
>   arm64: dts: rockchip: use SPDX-License-Identifier
>   ARM: dts: rockchip: use SPDX-License-Identifier

This had now 6 months for anybody concerned about this change to speak
up - with no NACKs received, so I've applied both patches for 4.19

Heiko

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-04 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-15 11:44 [PATCH 0/2] Use SPDX-License-Identifier for rockchip devicetree files Klaus Goger
2017-12-15 11:44 ` Klaus Goger
2017-12-15 11:44 ` Klaus Goger
     [not found] ` <20171215114427.32059-1-klaus.goger-SN7IsUiht6C/RdPyistoZJqQE7yCjDx5@public.gmane.org>
2017-12-15 11:44   ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: use SPDX-License-Identifier Klaus Goger
2017-12-15 11:44     ` Klaus Goger
2017-12-15 11:44     ` Klaus Goger
2017-12-15 11:44   ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: " Klaus Goger
2017-12-15 11:44     ` Klaus Goger
2017-12-15 13:45   ` [PATCH 0/2] Use SPDX-License-Identifier for rockchip devicetree files Philippe Ombredanne
2017-12-15 13:45     ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-12-15 13:45     ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-12-15 14:28     ` Heiko Stübner
2017-12-15 14:28       ` Heiko Stübner
2017-12-15 14:42       ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-12-15 14:42         ` Philippe Ombredanne
     [not found]         ` <CAOFm3uHuwmU1nCcU1MQ9qgGZ0A70ycuoo8XpWcDzgPQFzFRnRA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-12-15 15:20           ` Heiko Stübner
2017-12-15 15:20             ` Heiko Stübner
2017-12-15 16:27             ` klaus.goger
2017-12-15 16:27               ` klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com
2017-12-15 19:19               ` Brian Norris
2017-12-15 19:19                 ` Brian Norris
     [not found]               ` <24788EB1-9868-41E9-B97C-7D85D8C3761D-SN7IsUiht6C/RdPyistoZJqQE7yCjDx5@public.gmane.org>
2017-12-18 11:43                 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-12-18 11:43                   ` Matthias Brugger
2017-12-15 17:29   ` Doug Anderson
2017-12-15 17:29     ` Doug Anderson
2017-12-15 17:29     ` Doug Anderson
2018-06-04 10:18     ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-06-04 10:18       ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-06-04 10:18       ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-06-04 10:19 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2018-06-04 10:19   ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-06-04 10:19   ` Heiko Stuebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1700848.99AcjQORKy@phil \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=david.wu@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=finley.xiao@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=huibin.hong@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=icenowy@aosc.io \
    --cc=jacob-chen@iotwrt.com \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=romain.perier@collabora.com \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=william.wu@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=xxm@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.