All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next] r8169: improve handling task scheduling
@ 2023-11-27 17:20 Heiner Kallweit
  2023-11-28 11:53 ` Przemek Kitszel
  2023-11-30  3:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2023-11-27 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Realtek linux nic maintainers, Paolo Abeni, David Miller,
	Jakub Kicinski, Eric Dumazet
  Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org

If we know that the task is going to be a no-op, don't even schedule it.
And remove the check for netif_running() in the worker function, the
check for flag RTL_FLAG_TASK_ENABLED is sufficient. Note that we can't
remove the check for flag RTL_FLAG_TASK_ENABLED in the worker function
because we have no guarantee when it will be executed.

Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
index b74d7cc50..91d9dc5a7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
@@ -2228,6 +2228,9 @@ u16 rtl8168h_2_get_adc_bias_ioffset(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
 
 static void rtl_schedule_task(struct rtl8169_private *tp, enum rtl_flag flag)
 {
+	if (!test_bit(RTL_FLAG_TASK_ENABLED, tp->wk.flags))
+		return;
+
 	set_bit(flag, tp->wk.flags);
 	schedule_work(&tp->wk.work);
 }
@@ -4468,8 +4471,7 @@ static void rtl_task(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	rtnl_lock();
 
-	if (!netif_running(tp->dev) ||
-	    !test_bit(RTL_FLAG_TASK_ENABLED, tp->wk.flags))
+	if (!test_bit(RTL_FLAG_TASK_ENABLED, tp->wk.flags))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
 	if (test_and_clear_bit(RTL_FLAG_TASK_TX_TIMEOUT, tp->wk.flags)) {
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] r8169: improve handling task scheduling
  2023-11-27 17:20 [PATCH net-next] r8169: improve handling task scheduling Heiner Kallweit
@ 2023-11-28 11:53 ` Przemek Kitszel
  2023-11-30  3:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Przemek Kitszel @ 2023-11-28 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Heiner Kallweit, Realtek linux nic maintainers, Paolo Abeni,
	David Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Eric Dumazet
  Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org

On 11/27/23 18:20, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> If we know that the task is going to be a no-op, don't even schedule it.
> And remove the check for netif_running() in the worker function, the
> check for flag RTL_FLAG_TASK_ENABLED is sufficient. Note that we can't
> remove the check for flag RTL_FLAG_TASK_ENABLED in the worker function
> because we have no guarantee when it will be executed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 6 ++++--
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> index b74d7cc50..91d9dc5a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> @@ -2228,6 +2228,9 @@ u16 rtl8168h_2_get_adc_bias_ioffset(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>   
>   static void rtl_schedule_task(struct rtl8169_private *tp, enum rtl_flag flag)
>   {
> +	if (!test_bit(RTL_FLAG_TASK_ENABLED, tp->wk.flags))
> +		return;
> +
>   	set_bit(flag, tp->wk.flags);
>   	schedule_work(&tp->wk.work);
>   }
> @@ -4468,8 +4471,7 @@ static void rtl_task(struct work_struct *work)
>   
>   	rtnl_lock();
>   
> -	if (!netif_running(tp->dev) ||
> -	    !test_bit(RTL_FLAG_TASK_ENABLED, tp->wk.flags))
> +	if (!test_bit(RTL_FLAG_TASK_ENABLED, tp->wk.flags))
>   		goto out_unlock;
>   
>   	if (test_and_clear_bit(RTL_FLAG_TASK_TX_TIMEOUT, tp->wk.flags)) {

sounds plausible and likely to run better,

Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] r8169: improve handling task scheduling
  2023-11-27 17:20 [PATCH net-next] r8169: improve handling task scheduling Heiner Kallweit
  2023-11-28 11:53 ` Przemek Kitszel
@ 2023-11-30  3:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2023-11-30  3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Heiner Kallweit; +Cc: nic_swsd, pabeni, davem, kuba, edumazet, netdev

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 18:20:11 +0100 you wrote:
> If we know that the task is going to be a no-op, don't even schedule it.
> And remove the check for netif_running() in the worker function, the
> check for flag RTL_FLAG_TASK_ENABLED is sufficient. Note that we can't
> remove the check for flag RTL_FLAG_TASK_ENABLED in the worker function
> because we have no guarantee when it will be executed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] r8169: improve handling task scheduling
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/127532cd0f06

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-30  3:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-11-27 17:20 [PATCH net-next] r8169: improve handling task scheduling Heiner Kallweit
2023-11-28 11:53 ` Przemek Kitszel
2023-11-30  3:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.