* Adapter teaming
@ 2003-01-06 16:13 Joseph Marshall
2003-01-06 17:04 ` Brian Tinsley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Marshall @ 2003-01-06 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
Has anyone had any success using NFS on a server that is also doing Adapter teaming? For some reason when if I have adapter teaming set-up and an NFS share mounted my entire server will "lock-up". If I turn adpater teaming off, the NFS mount works fine. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Joe
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Adapter teaming
2003-01-06 16:13 Adapter teaming Joseph Marshall
@ 2003-01-06 17:04 ` Brian Tinsley
2003-01-06 17:20 ` Danny Smith
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Tinsley @ 2003-01-06 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph Marshall; +Cc: nfs
Yes, we use both the Intel driver (iANS) and the stock bonding driver on
our NFS servers and have had no problems. More specifics on your
configuration would help.
Joseph Marshall wrote:
>Has anyone had any success using NFS on a server that is also doing Adapter teaming? For some reason when if I have adapter teaming set-up and an NFS share mounted my entire server will "lock-up". If I turn adpater teaming off, the NFS mount works fine. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Joe
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>Welcome to geek heaven.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>_______________________________________________
>NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
>
>
--
-[========================]-
-[ Brian Tinsley ]-
-[ Chief Systems Engineer ]-
-[ Emageon ]-
-[========================]-
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Adapter teaming
2003-01-06 17:04 ` Brian Tinsley
@ 2003-01-06 17:20 ` Danny Smith
2003-01-07 1:31 ` Scott Mcdermott
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Danny Smith @ 2003-01-06 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Tinsley; +Cc: Joseph Marshall, nfs
I've seen similar results when the teaming is misconfigured on the
switch, and hence losing packets (half of them in my case).
A quick ping should show that up fairly quickly.
Generally the bonding code works well for us.
Brian Tinsley wrote:
> Yes, we use both the Intel driver (iANS) and the stock bonding driver
> on our NFS servers and have had no problems. More specifics on your
> configuration would help.
>
>
> Joseph Marshall wrote:
>
>> Has anyone had any success using NFS on a server that is also doing
>> Adapter teaming? For some reason when if I have adapter teaming
>> set-up and an NFS share mounted my entire server will "lock-up". If
>> I turn adpater teaming off, the NFS mount works fine. Any insight
>> would be greatly appreciated.
>> Joe
>
--
Danny Smith
Senior Systems Administrator, Cinesite (Europe) Ltd
020 7973 4000 - x4055 / dannys@cinesite.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Adapter teaming
2003-01-06 17:20 ` Danny Smith
@ 2003-01-07 1:31 ` Scott Mcdermott
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Scott Mcdermott @ 2003-01-07 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
Danny Smith on Mon 6/01 17:20 +0000:
> Generally the bonding code works well for us.
and me too, seems to work fine serving off of bond0 with 3c905C,
trunked to HP4000M
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-07 1:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-06 16:13 Adapter teaming Joseph Marshall
2003-01-06 17:04 ` Brian Tinsley
2003-01-06 17:20 ` Danny Smith
2003-01-07 1:31 ` Scott Mcdermott
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.