From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com,
thomas.abraham@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] pinctrl: samsung: Include pinctrl-exynos driver data conditionally
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 22:38:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1733680.zsxXgkCci5@flatron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363642315-10331-3-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
On Monday 18 of March 2013 22:31:51 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Since pinctrl-samsung is a common part of the pin control support for
> several Samsung SoCs, it can be compiled without Exynos support enabled.
>
> This patch surrounds Exynos-specific driver data with ifdefs to include
> them only when support for Exynos is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c index b1d4ac8..f1fb562 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
> @@ -968,10 +968,12 @@ static int samsung_pinctrl_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev) }
>
> static const struct of_device_id samsung_pinctrl_dt_match[] = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL_EXYNOS4
Oops... This should be CONFIG_PINCTRL_EXYNOS. It used to be EXYNOS4 in
Kgene's tree (on which I usually base my patches) for some time, but it no
longer is, but I forgot to change this during rebae.
Linus, if remaining patches turned out to be OK, would you fix this when
applying?
Best regards,
Tomasz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] pinctrl: samsung: Include pinctrl-exynos driver data conditionally
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 22:38:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1733680.zsxXgkCci5@flatron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363642315-10331-3-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
On Monday 18 of March 2013 22:31:51 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Since pinctrl-samsung is a common part of the pin control support for
> several Samsung SoCs, it can be compiled without Exynos support enabled.
>
> This patch surrounds Exynos-specific driver data with ifdefs to include
> them only when support for Exynos is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c index b1d4ac8..f1fb562 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
> @@ -968,10 +968,12 @@ static int samsung_pinctrl_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev) }
>
> static const struct of_device_id samsung_pinctrl_dt_match[] = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL_EXYNOS4
Oops... This should be CONFIG_PINCTRL_EXYNOS. It used to be EXYNOS4 in
Kgene's tree (on which I usually base my patches) for some time, but it no
longer is, but I forgot to change this during rebae.
Linus, if remaining patches turned out to be OK, would you fix this when
applying?
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-18 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-18 21:31 [PATCH 0/6] pinctrl: Add support for pin control on S3C64xx Tomasz Figa
2013-03-18 21:31 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-03-18 21:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] pinctrl: samsung: Protect bank registers with a spinlock Tomasz Figa
2013-03-18 21:31 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-09 7:37 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-09 7:37 ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-18 21:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] pinctrl: samsung: Include pinctrl-exynos driver data conditionally Tomasz Figa
2013-03-18 21:31 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-03-18 21:38 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2013-03-18 21:38 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-09 7:40 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-09 7:40 ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-18 21:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] pinctrl: samsung: Split pin bank description into two structures Tomasz Figa
2013-03-18 21:31 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-03 21:05 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-03 21:05 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-09 7:41 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-09 7:41 ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-18 21:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] pinctrl: samsung: Remove hardcoded register offsets Tomasz Figa
2013-03-18 21:31 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-09 7:43 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-09 7:43 ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-18 21:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] pinctrl: samsung: Handle banks with two configuration registers Tomasz Figa
2013-03-18 21:31 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-09 7:44 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-09 7:44 ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-18 21:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] pinctrl: Add pinctrl-s3c64xx driver Tomasz Figa
2013-03-18 21:31 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-04-09 7:47 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-09 7:47 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-02 8:00 ` [PATCH 0/6] pinctrl: Add support for pin control on S3C64xx Tomasz Figa
2013-04-02 8:00 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1733680.zsxXgkCci5@flatron \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.