* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review
2025-01-30 14:41 [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-01-30 17:58 ` Mark Brown
2025-01-30 21:58 ` Florian Fainelli
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-01-30 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 03:41:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.12 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review
2025-01-30 14:41 [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-30 17:58 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-01-30 21:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-01-31 5:39 ` Jon Hunter
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-01-30 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie
On 1/30/25 06:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.12 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:41:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.12-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review
2025-01-30 14:41 [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-30 17:58 ` Mark Brown
2025-01-30 21:58 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-01-31 5:39 ` Jon Hunter
2025-01-31 10:49 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-01-31 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:41:57 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.12 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:41:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.12-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.12:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.12.12-rc2-g4d14e2486de5
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review
2025-01-30 14:41 [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-31 5:39 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-01-31 10:49 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
2025-01-31 13:46 ` Ron Economos
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Takeshi Ogasawara @ 2025-01-31 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Hi Greg
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:42 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.12 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:41:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.12-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
6.12.12-rc2 tested.
Build successfully completed.
Boot successfully completed.
No dmesg regressions.
Video output normal.
Sound output normal.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen10(Intel i7-1260P(x86_64) arch linux)
[ 0.000000] Linux version 6.12.12-rc2rv
(takeshi@ThinkPadX1Gen10J0764) (gcc (GCC) 14.2.1 20240910, GNU ld (GNU
Binutils) 2.43.1) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Jan 31 19:24:31 JST 2025
Thanks
Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review
2025-01-30 14:41 [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-31 10:49 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
@ 2025-01-31 13:46 ` Ron Economos
2025-01-31 14:47 ` Justin Forbes
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2025-01-31 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 1/30/25 06:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.12 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:41:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.12-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review
2025-01-30 14:41 [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-31 13:46 ` Ron Economos
@ 2025-01-31 14:47 ` Justin Forbes
2025-01-31 15:26 ` Markus Reichelt
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Justin Forbes @ 2025-01-31 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 03:41:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.12 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:41:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.12-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested rc2 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, ppc64le, s390x,
x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review
2025-01-30 14:41 [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-31 14:47 ` Justin Forbes
@ 2025-01-31 15:26 ` Markus Reichelt
2025-01-31 15:34 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Markus Reichelt @ 2025-01-31 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable, linux-kernel
* Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.12 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:41:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg
6.12.12-rc2 compiles, boots and runs here for on x86_64 (AMD Ryzen 5 7520U,
Slackware64-current) for 1h, no regressions observed.
Tested-by: Markus Reichelt <lkt+2023@mareichelt.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review
2025-01-30 14:41 [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-31 15:26 ` Markus Reichelt
@ 2025-01-31 15:34 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-01-31 16:35 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-01-31 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 at 20:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.12 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:41:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.12-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.12.12-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 4d14e2486de5514e8267e9061685a372056a2b94
* git describe: v6.12.11-42-g4d14e2486de5
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.12.y/build/v6.12.11-42-g4d14e2486de5
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.12.10-122-g0bde21f27343)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.12.10-122-g0bde21f27343)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.12.10-122-g0bde21f27343)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.12.10-122-g0bde21f27343)
## Test result summary
total: 137811, pass: 91565, fail: 28303, skip: 17859, xfail: 84
## Build Summary
* arc: 6 total, 5 passed, 1 failed
* arm: 143 total, 137 passed, 6 failed
* arm64: 58 total, 56 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 22 total, 19 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 38 total, 33 passed, 5 failed
* parisc: 5 total, 3 passed, 2 failed
* powerpc: 44 total, 40 passed, 4 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 24 passed, 3 failed
* s390: 26 total, 22 passed, 4 failed
* sh: 6 total, 5 passed, 1 failed
* sparc: 5 total, 3 passed, 2 failed
* x86_64: 50 total, 49 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-rust
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review
2025-01-30 14:41 [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-31 15:34 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-01-31 16:35 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2025-02-01 8:16 ` [PATCH 6.12] " Hardik Garg
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2025-01-31 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: Usama.Anjum, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 1/30/25 7:41 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.12 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:41:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.12-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
OVERVIEW
Builds: 29 passed, 0 failed
Boot tests: 667 passed, 2 failed
CI systems: maestro
REVISION
Commit
name: v6.12.11-42-g4d14e2486de5
hash: 4d14e2486de5514e8267e9061685a372056a2b94
Checked out from
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
BUILDS
No build failures found
BOOT TESTS
Failures
arm64:(defconfig)
-mt8195-cherry-tomato-r2
https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/test/test?var-datasource=edquppk2ghfcwc&var-origin=$__all&var-build_architecture=$__all&var-build_config_name=$__all&var-id=maestro:679ba54865fae3351e318fd9&from=now-100y&to=now&timezone=browser&var-test_path=&var-issue_presence=$__all
https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/test/test?var-datasource=edquppk2ghfcwc&var-origin=$__all&var-build_architecture=$__all&var-build_config_name=$__all&var-id=maestro:679baad565fae3351e31b376&from=now-100y&to=now&timezone=browser&var-test_path=&var-issue_presence=$__all
CI system: maestro
See complete and up-to-date report at:
https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/revision/revision?orgId=1&var-git_commit_hash=4d14e2486de5514e8267e9061685a372056a2b94&var-patchset_hash=
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
KernelCI team
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12] 6.12.12-rc2 review
2025-01-30 14:41 [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-31 16:35 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
@ 2025-02-01 8:16 ` Hardik Garg
2025-02-01 13:19 ` [PATCH 6.12 00/41] " Kexy Biscuit
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Hardik Garg @ 2025-02-01 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh, linux-kernel,
linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw,
stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds
The kernel, bpf tool, perf tool, and kselftest builds fine for v6.12.12-rc2 on x86 and arm64 Azure VM.
Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks,
Hardik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review
2025-01-30 14:41 [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2025-02-01 8:16 ` [PATCH 6.12] " Hardik Garg
@ 2025-02-01 13:19 ` Kexy Biscuit
2025-02-01 13:29 ` Peter Schneider
2025-02-02 13:29 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Kexy Biscuit @ 2025-02-01 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 1/30/2025 10:41 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.12 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:41:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.12-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Building passed on amd64, arm64, loongarch64, mips64el, ppc64el, and
riscv64. Smoke testing passed on 3 amd64, 2 arm64, and 2 loongarch64
test systems.
Tested-by: Kexy Biscuit <kexybiscuit@aosc.io>
https://github.com/AOSC-Dev/aosc-os-abbs/pull/9524
--
Best Regards,
Kexy Biscuit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review
2025-01-30 14:41 [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2025-02-01 13:19 ` [PATCH 6.12 00/41] " Kexy Biscuit
@ 2025-02-01 13:29 ` Peter Schneider
2025-02-02 13:29 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2025-02-01 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Am 30.01.2025 um 15:41 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.12 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg
oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review
2025-01-30 14:41 [PATCH 6.12 00/41] 6.12.12-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2025-02-01 13:29 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2025-02-02 13:29 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2025-02-02 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Darren Kenny, Vegard Nossum
Hi Greg,
On 30/01/25 20:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.12 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:41:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Sorry for the delayed response, I thought it would be good to let you know:
No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread