From: patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
daehojeong@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to set .discard_granularity correctly
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:30:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174076023474.2198557.14487536579623357304.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250224062007.1324623-1-chao@kernel.org>
Hello:
This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:20:07 +0800 you wrote:
> commit 4f993264fe29 ("f2fs: introduce discard_unit mount option") introduced
> a bug, when we enable discard_unit=section option, it will set
> .discard_granularity to BLKS_PER_SEC(), however discard granularity only
> supports [1, 512], once section size is not equal to segment size, it will
> cause issue_discard_thread() in DPOLICY_BG mode will not select discard entry
> w/ any granularity to issue.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [f2fs-dev] f2fs: fix to set .discard_granularity correctly
https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/1b60b23975d6
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: patchwork-bot+f2fs@kernel.org
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, daehojeong@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to set .discard_granularity correctly
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:30:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174076023474.2198557.14487536579623357304.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250224062007.1324623-1-chao@kernel.org>
Hello:
This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:20:07 +0800 you wrote:
> commit 4f993264fe29 ("f2fs: introduce discard_unit mount option") introduced
> a bug, when we enable discard_unit=section option, it will set
> .discard_granularity to BLKS_PER_SEC(), however discard granularity only
> supports [1, 512], once section size is not equal to segment size, it will
> cause issue_discard_thread() in DPOLICY_BG mode will not select discard entry
> w/ any granularity to issue.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [f2fs-dev] f2fs: fix to set .discard_granularity correctly
https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/1b60b23975d6
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-28 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-24 6:20 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to set .discard_granularity correctly Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-02-24 6:20 ` Chao Yu
2025-02-28 16:30 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2025-02-28 16:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174076023474.2198557.14487536579623357304.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=daehojeong@google.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patchwork-bot+f2fs@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.