From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
sdf@fomichev.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 17:30:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174292383401.660431.1912162765020068057.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250324224537.248800-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:45:26 -0700 you wrote:
> Skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET ops on devices which opt
> into running all ops under the instance lock.
>
> This fixes and completes Stan's ops-locking work, so I think
> for sanity / ease of backporting fixes we should merge it for
> v6.15.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v2,01/11] net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ba6f418fbf64
- [net-next,v2,02/11] net: remove netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() helper for when SYSFS=n
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/bae2da826196
- [net-next,v2,03/11] net: constify dev pointer in misc instance lock helpers
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e2f81e8f4d0c
- [net-next,v2,04/11] net: explain "protection types" for the instance lock
(no matching commit)
- [net-next,v2,05/11] net: designate queue counts as "double ops protected" by instance lock
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/0a65dcf6249b
- [net-next,v2,06/11] net: designate queue -> napi linking as "ops protected"
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/310ae9eb2617
- [net-next,v2,07/11] net: protect rxq->mp_params with the instance lock
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b52458652eca
- [net-next,v2,08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent
(no matching commit)
- [net-next,v2,09/11] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected"
(no matching commit)
- [net-next,v2,10/11] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers
(no matching commit)
- [net-next,v2,11/11] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible
(no matching commit)
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 22:45 [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf() Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 5:19 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: remove netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() helper for when SYSFS=n Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] net: constify dev pointer in misc instance lock helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/11] net: explain "protection types" for the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/11] net: designate queue counts as "double ops protected" by " Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/11] net: designate queue -> napi linking as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: protect rxq->mp_params with the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 5:34 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-25 9:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 12:17 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-25 17:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/11] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/11] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/11] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-25 17:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174292383401.660431.1912162765020068057.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.