From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf()
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:45:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250324224537.248800-2-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250324224537.248800-1-kuba@kernel.org>
A recent commit added taking the netdev instance lock
in netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit(), but didn't remove it in
net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf() which it calls from an error path.
Always expect the callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf() to
hold the lock. This is consistent with net_devmem_bind_dmabuf().
(Not so) coincidentally this also protects mp_param with the instance
lock, which the rest of this series needs.
Fixes: 1d22d3060b9b ("net: drop rtnl_lock for queue_mgmt operations")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
v2:
- rebase on a70f891e0fa0 ("net: devmem: do not WARN conditionally after netdev_rx_queue_restart()")
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20250312223507.805719-2-kuba@kernel.org
---
net/core/devmem.c | 2 --
net/core/netdev-genl.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/devmem.c b/net/core/devmem.c
index 6802e82a4d03..ee145a2aa41c 100644
--- a/net/core/devmem.c
+++ b/net/core/devmem.c
@@ -128,12 +128,10 @@ void net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf(struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding)
rxq->mp_params.mp_priv = NULL;
rxq->mp_params.mp_ops = NULL;
- netdev_lock(binding->dev);
rxq_idx = get_netdev_rx_queue_index(rxq);
err = netdev_rx_queue_restart(binding->dev, rxq_idx);
WARN_ON(err && err != -ENETDOWN);
- netdev_unlock(binding->dev);
}
xa_erase(&net_devmem_dmabuf_bindings, binding->id);
diff --git a/net/core/netdev-genl.c b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
index a186fea63c09..9e4882a22407 100644
--- a/net/core/netdev-genl.c
+++ b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
@@ -947,7 +947,9 @@ void netdev_nl_sock_priv_destroy(struct netdev_nl_sock *priv)
mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(binding, temp, &priv->bindings, list) {
+ netdev_lock(binding->dev);
net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf(binding);
+ netdev_unlock(binding->dev);
}
mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
}
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-24 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 22:45 [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf() Mina Almasry
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: remove netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() helper for when SYSFS=n Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] net: constify dev pointer in misc instance lock helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/11] net: explain "protection types" for the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/11] net: designate queue counts as "double ops protected" by " Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/11] net: designate queue -> napi linking as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: protect rxq->mp_params with the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 5:34 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-25 9:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 12:17 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-25 17:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/11] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/11] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/11] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-25 17:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250324224537.248800-2-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.