* [PATCH] tracing: fprobe events: Fix possible UAF on modules
@ 2025-03-31 14:05 Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) @ 2025-03-31 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Commit ac91052f0ae5 ("tracing: tprobe-events: Fix leakage of module
refcount") moved try_module_get() from __find_tracepoint_module_cb()
to find_tracepoint() caller, but that introduced a possible UAF
because the module can be unloaded before try_module_get(). In this
case, the module object should be freed too. Thus, try_module_get()
does not only fail but may access to the freed object.
To avoid that, try_module_get() in __find_tracepoint_module_cb()
again.
Fixes: ac91052f0ae5 ("tracing: tprobe-events: Fix leakage of module refcount")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
index 985ff98272da..2cd9ff1049f1 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
@@ -919,9 +919,15 @@ static void __find_tracepoint_module_cb(struct tracepoint *tp, struct module *mo
struct __find_tracepoint_cb_data *data = priv;
if (!data->tpoint && !strcmp(data->tp_name, tp->name)) {
- data->tpoint = tp;
- if (!data->mod)
+ /* If module is not specified, try getting module refcount. */
+ if (!data->mod && mod) {
+ /* If failed to get refcount, ignore this tracepoint. */
+ if (!try_module_get(mod))
+ return;
+
data->mod = mod;
+ }
+ data->tpoint = tp;
}
}
@@ -933,7 +939,11 @@ static void __find_tracepoint_cb(struct tracepoint *tp, void *priv)
data->tpoint = tp;
}
-/* Find a tracepoint from kernel and module. */
+/*
+ * Find a tracepoint from kernel and module. If the tracepoint is on the module,
+ * the module's refcount is incremented and returned as *@tp_mod. Thus, if it is
+ * not NULL, caller must call module_put(*tp_mod) after used the tracepoint.
+ */
static struct tracepoint *find_tracepoint(const char *tp_name,
struct module **tp_mod)
{
@@ -962,7 +972,10 @@ static void reenable_trace_fprobe(struct trace_fprobe *tf)
}
}
-/* Find a tracepoint from specified module. */
+/*
+ * Find a tracepoint from specified module. In this case, this does not get the
+ * module's refcount. The caller must ensure the module is not freed.
+ */
static struct tracepoint *find_tracepoint_in_module(struct module *mod,
const char *tp_name)
{
@@ -1169,11 +1182,6 @@ static int trace_fprobe_create_internal(int argc, const char *argv[],
if (is_tracepoint) {
ctx->flags |= TPARG_FL_TPOINT;
tpoint = find_tracepoint(symbol, &tp_mod);
- /* lock module until register this tprobe. */
- if (tp_mod && !try_module_get(tp_mod)) {
- tpoint = NULL;
- tp_mod = NULL;
- }
if (tpoint) {
ctx->funcname = kallsyms_lookup(
(unsigned long)tpoint->probestub,
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-03-31 14:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-31 14:05 [PATCH] tracing: fprobe events: Fix possible UAF on modules Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.