[net-next PATCH v3 0/2] octeontx2-pf: Do not detect MACSEC block based on silicon

[net-next PATCH v3 0/2] octeontx2-pf: Do not detect MACSEC block based on silicon

[Subbaraya Sundeep]

Out of various silicon variants of CN10K series some have hardware
MACSEC block for offloading MACSEC operations and some do not.
AF driver already has the information of whether MACSEC is present
or not on running silicon. Hence fetch that information from
AF via mailbox message.

Changes for v3:
 None. Resubmitting as v3 since there is no activity on v2
 for a while.
Changes for v2:
 Changed subject prefix to net-next

Subbaraya Sundeep (2):
  octeontx2-af: Add MACSEC capability flag
  octeontx2-pf: macsec: Get MACSEC capability flag from AF

 drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h   |  2 ++
 drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c    |  3 ++
 .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c   | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.h   |  4 +--
 .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c   |  2 ++
 5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4

Re: [net-next PATCH v3 0/2] octeontx2-pf: Do not detect MACSEC block based on silicon

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:

On Thu, 22 May 2025 11:45:16 +0530 you wrote:
> Out of various silicon variants of CN10K series some have hardware
> MACSEC block for offloading MACSEC operations and some do not.
> AF driver already has the information of whether MACSEC is present
> or not on running silicon. Hence fetch that information from
> AF via mailbox message.
> 
> Changes for v3:
>  None. Resubmitting as v3 since there is no activity on v2
>  for a while.
> Changes for v2:
>  Changed subject prefix to net-next
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,v3,1/2] octeontx2-af: Add MACSEC capability flag
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/732038370e55
  - [net-next,v3,2/2] octeontx2-pf: macsec: Get MACSEC capability flag from AF
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/5fa6f0245960

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html