[PATCH] riscv: cpufeature: add validation for zfa, zfh and zfhmin

[PATCH] riscv: cpufeature: add validation for zfa, zfh and zfhmin

[Clément Léger]

These extensions depends on the F one. Add a validation callback
checking for the F extension to be present. Now that extensions are
correctly reported using the F/D presence, we can remove the
has_fpu() check in hwprobe_isa_ext0().

Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c  |  6 +++---
 arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 14 ++++++--------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 2054f6c4b0ae..dc258dbe4dd9 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -457,10 +457,10 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
 	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zacas, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZACAS),
 	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zalrsc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZALRSC),
 	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zawrs, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZAWRS),
-	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zfa, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFA),
+	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_VALIDATE(zfa, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFA, riscv_ext_f_depends),
 	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_VALIDATE(zfbfmin, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFBFMIN, riscv_ext_f_depends),
-	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zfh, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFH),
-	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zfhmin, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFHMIN),
+	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_VALIDATE(zfh, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFH, riscv_ext_f_depends),
+	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_VALIDATE(zfhmin, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFHMIN, riscv_ext_f_depends),
 	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zca, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCA),
 	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_VALIDATE(zcb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCB, riscv_ext_zca_depends),
 	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_VALIDATE(zcd, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCD, riscv_ext_zcd_validate),
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
index 249aec8594a9..a3dd31379262 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
@@ -151,14 +151,12 @@ static void hwprobe_isa_ext0(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
 			EXT_KEY(ZVKT);
 		}
 
-		if (has_fpu()) {
-			EXT_KEY(ZCD);
-			EXT_KEY(ZCF);
-			EXT_KEY(ZFA);
-			EXT_KEY(ZFBFMIN);
-			EXT_KEY(ZFH);
-			EXT_KEY(ZFHMIN);
-		}
+		EXT_KEY(ZCD);
+		EXT_KEY(ZCF);
+		EXT_KEY(ZFA);
+		EXT_KEY(ZFBFMIN);
+		EXT_KEY(ZFH);
+		EXT_KEY(ZFHMIN);
 
 		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM))
 			EXT_KEY(SUPM);
-- 
2.49.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

[PATCH] riscv: cpufeature: add validation for zfa, zfh and zfhmin

[Clément Léger]

These extensions depends on the F one. Add a validation callback
checking for the F extension to be present. Now that extensions are
correctly reported using the F/D presence, we can remove the
has_fpu() check in hwprobe_isa_ext0().

Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c  |  6 +++---
 arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 14 ++++++--------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 2054f6c4b0ae..dc258dbe4dd9 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -457,10 +457,10 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
 	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zacas, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZACAS),
 	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zalrsc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZALRSC),
 	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zawrs, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZAWRS),
-	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zfa, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFA),
+	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_VALIDATE(zfa, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFA, riscv_ext_f_depends),
 	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_VALIDATE(zfbfmin, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFBFMIN, riscv_ext_f_depends),
-	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zfh, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFH),
-	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zfhmin, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFHMIN),
+	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_VALIDATE(zfh, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFH, riscv_ext_f_depends),
+	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_VALIDATE(zfhmin, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFHMIN, riscv_ext_f_depends),
 	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zca, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCA),
 	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_VALIDATE(zcb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCB, riscv_ext_zca_depends),
 	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_VALIDATE(zcd, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCD, riscv_ext_zcd_validate),
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
index 249aec8594a9..a3dd31379262 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
@@ -151,14 +151,12 @@ static void hwprobe_isa_ext0(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
 			EXT_KEY(ZVKT);
 		}
 
-		if (has_fpu()) {
-			EXT_KEY(ZCD);
-			EXT_KEY(ZCF);
-			EXT_KEY(ZFA);
-			EXT_KEY(ZFBFMIN);
-			EXT_KEY(ZFH);
-			EXT_KEY(ZFHMIN);
-		}
+		EXT_KEY(ZCD);
+		EXT_KEY(ZCF);
+		EXT_KEY(ZFA);
+		EXT_KEY(ZFBFMIN);
+		EXT_KEY(ZFH);
+		EXT_KEY(ZFHMIN);
 
 		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM))
 			EXT_KEY(SUPM);
-- 
2.49.0

Re: [PATCH] riscv: cpufeature: add validation for zfa, zfh and zfhmin

[Conor Dooley]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 425 bytes --]

On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 12:00:00PM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> These extensions depends on the F one. Add a validation callback
> checking for the F extension to be present. Now that extensions are
> correctly reported using the F/D presence, we can remove the
> has_fpu() check in hwprobe_isa_ext0().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>

Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: cpufeature: add validation for zfa, zfh and zfhmin

[Conor Dooley]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 425 bytes --]

On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 12:00:00PM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> These extensions depends on the F one. Add a validation callback
> checking for the F extension to be present. Now that extensions are
> correctly reported using the F/D presence, we can remove the
> has_fpu() check in hwprobe_isa_ext0().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>

Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] riscv: cpufeature: add validation for zfa, zfh and zfhmin

[patchwork-bot+linux-riscv]

Hello:

This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>:

On Tue, 27 May 2025 12:00:00 +0200 you wrote:
> These extensions depends on the F one. Add a validation callback
> checking for the F extension to be present. Now that extensions are
> correctly reported using the F/D presence, we can remove the
> has_fpu() check in hwprobe_isa_ext0().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - riscv: cpufeature: add validation for zfa, zfh and zfhmin
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/3de29352aaeb

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: cpufeature: add validation for zfa, zfh and zfhmin

[patchwork-bot+linux-riscv]

Hello:

This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>:

On Tue, 27 May 2025 12:00:00 +0200 you wrote:
> These extensions depends on the F one. Add a validation callback
> checking for the F extension to be present. Now that extensions are
> correctly reported using the F/D presence, we can remove the
> has_fpu() check in hwprobe_isa_ext0().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - riscv: cpufeature: add validation for zfa, zfh and zfhmin
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/3de29352aaeb

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html