From: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org
To: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, bhe@redhat.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
andreyknvl@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
zhangqing@loongson.cn, chenhuacai@loongson.cn,
davidgow@google.com, glider@google.com, dvyukov@google.com,
alexghiti@rivosinc.com, alex@ghiti.fr, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, elver@google.com,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] kasan: unify kasan_enabled() and remove arch-specific implementations
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 01:07:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <175997202628.3661959.104646439887808862.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250810125746.1105476-1-snovitoll@gmail.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2025 17:57:44 +0500 you wrote:
> This patch series addresses the fragmentation in KASAN initialization
> across architectures by introducing a unified approach that eliminates
> duplicate static keys and arch-specific kasan_arch_is_ready()
> implementations.
>
> The core issue is that different architectures have inconsistent approaches
> to KASAN readiness tracking:
> - PowerPC, LoongArch, and UML arch, each implement own kasan_arch_is_ready()
> - Only HW_TAGS mode had a unified static key (kasan_flag_enabled)
> - Generic and SW_TAGS modes relied on arch-specific solutions
> or always-on behavior
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v6,1/2] kasan: introduce ARCH_DEFER_KASAN and unify static key across modes
https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/1e338f4d99e6
- [v6,2/2] kasan: call kasan_init_generic in kasan_init
https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/e45085f2673b
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org
To: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, bhe@redhat.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
andreyknvl@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
zhangqing@loongson.cn, chenhuacai@loongson.cn,
davidgow@google.com, glider@google.com, dvyukov@google.com,
alexghiti@rivosinc.com, alex@ghiti.fr, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, elver@google.com,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] kasan: unify kasan_enabled() and remove arch-specific implementations
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 01:07:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <175997202628.3661959.104646439887808862.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250810125746.1105476-1-snovitoll@gmail.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2025 17:57:44 +0500 you wrote:
> This patch series addresses the fragmentation in KASAN initialization
> across architectures by introducing a unified approach that eliminates
> duplicate static keys and arch-specific kasan_arch_is_ready()
> implementations.
>
> The core issue is that different architectures have inconsistent approaches
> to KASAN readiness tracking:
> - PowerPC, LoongArch, and UML arch, each implement own kasan_arch_is_ready()
> - Only HW_TAGS mode had a unified static key (kasan_flag_enabled)
> - Generic and SW_TAGS modes relied on arch-specific solutions
> or always-on behavior
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v6,1/2] kasan: introduce ARCH_DEFER_KASAN and unify static key across modes
https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/1e338f4d99e6
- [v6,2/2] kasan: call kasan_init_generic in kasan_init
https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/e45085f2673b
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-09 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-10 12:57 [PATCH v6 0/2] kasan: unify kasan_enabled() and remove arch-specific implementations Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2025-08-10 12:57 ` Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2025-08-10 12:57 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] kasan: introduce ARCH_DEFER_KASAN and unify static key across modes Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2025-08-10 12:57 ` Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2025-08-11 5:38 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-11 5:38 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-03 13:00 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-09-03 13:00 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-09-03 13:01 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-09-03 13:01 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-09-15 4:30 ` Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2025-09-15 4:30 ` Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2025-09-16 3:36 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-16 3:36 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-23 17:49 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-09-23 17:49 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-09-04 0:24 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-09-04 0:24 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-10-09 15:59 ` Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2025-10-09 15:59 ` Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2025-08-10 12:57 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] kasan: call kasan_init_generic in kasan_init Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2025-08-10 12:57 ` Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2025-08-11 5:39 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-11 5:39 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-10-09 1:07 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv [this message]
2025-10-09 1:07 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] kasan: unify kasan_enabled() and remove arch-specific implementations patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=175997202628.3661959.104646439887808862.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@loongson.cn \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=snovitoll@gmail.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=zhangqing@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.