From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org,
openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [yocto] RFC: OE-Core task rework
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:53:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1761512.HqMMdYPPnO@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570865.4gpYqKP9pu@helios>
On Tuesday 21 August 2012 09:49:37 Paul Eggleton wrote:
> The main concern with LSB is that we have something called task-basic,
> which seems to be intended for LSB but does not state as much, and I know
> at least one person has tried to use it and then been a little puzzled as
> to why rpm has been pulled in when ipk packaging has been selected. Just
> naming some of these tasks more appropriately would help avoid such
> situations. In the specific case of task-basic there may be a case for
> creating a similar but not LSB-focused task that pulls in real shell
> utilities in preference to the light versions provided by busybox.
Ugh, sorry. I meant task-core-basic here - not to be confused with task-basic
in meta-oe [1].
Cheers,
Paul
[1] http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Meta-oe_tasks
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org,
openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: OE-Core task rework
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:53:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1761512.HqMMdYPPnO@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570865.4gpYqKP9pu@helios>
On Tuesday 21 August 2012 09:49:37 Paul Eggleton wrote:
> The main concern with LSB is that we have something called task-basic,
> which seems to be intended for LSB but does not state as much, and I know
> at least one person has tried to use it and then been a little puzzled as
> to why rpm has been pulled in when ipk packaging has been selected. Just
> naming some of these tasks more appropriately would help avoid such
> situations. In the specific case of task-basic there may be a case for
> creating a similar but not LSB-focused task that pulls in real shell
> utilities in preference to the light versions provided by busybox.
Ugh, sorry. I meant task-core-basic here - not to be confused with task-basic
in meta-oe [1].
Cheers,
Paul
[1] http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Meta-oe_tasks
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-21 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-15 9:46 RFC: OE-Core task rework Paul Eggleton
2012-08-15 10:54 ` [yocto] " Koen Kooi
2012-08-15 10:54 ` Koen Kooi
2012-08-15 12:57 ` [yocto] " Paul Eggleton
2012-08-15 12:57 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-08-15 11:17 ` Jack Mitchell
2012-08-15 12:59 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-08-15 11:25 ` Phil Blundell
2012-08-15 13:08 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-08-15 18:05 ` Mark Hatle
2012-08-15 19:12 ` Chris Larson
2012-08-15 19:30 ` Mark Hatle
2012-08-15 18:01 ` Mark Hatle
2012-08-15 19:15 ` Chris Larson
2012-08-20 20:45 ` [yocto] " Mark Hatle
2012-08-20 20:45 ` Mark Hatle
2012-08-21 8:49 ` [yocto] " Paul Eggleton
2012-08-21 8:49 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-08-21 8:53 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2012-08-21 8:53 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-08-21 17:34 ` [yocto] " Philip Balister
2012-08-21 17:34 ` [OE-core] " Philip Balister
2012-08-21 17:34 ` [OE-core] [yocto] " Philip Balister
2012-08-28 7:05 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-08-28 7:05 ` [OE-core] " Paul Eggleton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1761512.HqMMdYPPnO@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.