From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>, Kamil Debski <kamil@wypas.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: pwm-fan: switch to new atomic PWM API
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:25:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1767160.ko02kahecW@amdc3058> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c741041-faf4-6951-5f2d-9f7b9c54c9ca@roeck-us.net>
Hi,
On Monday, April 24, 2017 06:26:12 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 04/24/2017 06:13 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Switch pwm-fan driver to new atomic PWM API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > Depends on "[PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support"
> > patchset (https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2495209.html).
> >
>
> Why would this driver, which does not depend on any Samsung code,
> depend on a Samsung specific fix ?
The above patchset contains pwm-fan specific patch:
"[PATCH v2 3/3] hwmon: pwm-fan: remove no longer needed suspend/resume code"
(https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2495210.html).
It seems that the patchset name itself could be better,
sorry for this.
> Was this tested with hardware ?
Yes, on Exynos5422 based Odroid-XU3 board.
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-24 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20170424131342epcas5p4cb2f53f6c780119557ff3da56fb8f0a8@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2017-04-24 13:13 ` [PATCH] hwmon: pwm-fan: switch to new atomic PWM API Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-04-24 13:13 ` [PATCH] pwm: pwm-samsung: " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-08-21 8:29 ` Thierry Reding
2017-04-24 13:26 ` [PATCH] hwmon: pwm-fan: " Guenter Roeck
2017-04-24 14:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2017-06-02 13:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-06-07 13:38 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-06-07 21:07 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1767160.ko02kahecW@amdc3058 \
--to=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=kamil@wypas.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.